This is a widely debated issue in the social and legal debate regarding sexuality. The more legalized an issue, such as in the case of heterosexual marriage the more accepted it is, and this is the underlying fear behind the legal challenges that have been waged both for and against homosexual unions in the present day. Marriage is a legal state, and has been for most of written history, it is therefore difficult for many to allow the legal definition of homosexuality to become one that is an accepted alternative to the broader world, through legislation. Legally homosexuality, is as socially defined by the act of choosing to establish a sexual partnership with a person of the same gender as one's self rather than with the opposite gender. Historically, the legal aspects of homosexuality must be addressed in order to come to an even partial understanding of the similarities and differences between the social and legal definitions of homosexuality. The similarities, between the two are striking, as the legal definition is once again engrained in the acts of sexuality performed that stress the deviance, see sodomy laws, most of which are rarely enforced unless a crime such as rape has been committed, yet are still there, potentially even to be enforced upon heterosexual couples in consensual relations, and for many an even more frightening concept to be...
Even when they believe the behavior deviant, and yet are willing to respond vehemently to legal issues that attempt to allow them civil rights as a minority or otherwise. Though most people in the U.S. are agreeable to civil unions (a legal distinction) possibly as a result of personal social acceptance of homosexuals they are often quick to point out the need to make such unions un-equal to marriage between a man and a woman. The reason for this is as convoluted as the definitions themselves.
This sort of solitary behavior in and of itself is not necessarily anti-social. but, what is anti-social is the fact that this individuals fails to interact with people around him. One time I came in and asked him where my friend was and he stated loudly and harshly (without looking up from his computer) that he did not know. This sort of response has successfully negated any further attempts
Chapter 12 talks about drinking and alcoholism. This disease is more widely accepted by U.S. society, but it still holds some level of deviance, especially considering the fact that many alcohol abusers are underage. Thio talks about the probable causes of alcoholism and the effects of this disease on people in both the micro and macro forms. Controlling alcoholism has proven very difficult and Thio gives the reader some hope
Furthermore, the label of deviance does not encourage society to question its supposed normalcy, although not so long ago, homosexuality or using birth control was labeled a criminal, deviant act. Finally, not all criminal acts are deviant per se, as speeding or drinking before the age of 21 and other actions that are technically violations of the law are often tolerated by the majority rather than the minority of
Child Observation (Deviant Behavior) Labeling Theory and Deviant Behavior In his book "Studies in the Sociology of Deviance," Howard Becker takes an unconventional approach to the concept of social deviance. Becker discusses the labeling theory in detail, giving examples of people whose behavior is deviant simply because it is labeled as deviant, such as marijuana users that are only deviant because of the label given to them. Becker discusses that once the
Homosexuality, Parenthood, And Social Deviance The article "Lesbian and gay parenting: babes in arms or babes in the woods?" (Mccann, & Delmonte, 2005) examines the nature of parenting in connection with openly homosexual couples and the manner in which the sexual preference of parents affects their children. According to the authors, most of the objections to parenting by gay couples are entirely unfounded. Specifically, males within same-sex couples are actually more
Further arguments that gay marriages do not contribute to the greater good are debatable, based largely on faith-based belief rather than empirical research. In the 1930s, sociologist Edwin Schur wrote extensively about the idea of victimless crimes. For Schur, victimless crimes involve an exchange of commodities or services that are socially-disapproved. These exchanges are voluntary and do not cause anyone harm (Schur, 3). Schur himself cited consensual homosexual unions as an example
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now