Verified Document

Descartes Fourth Meditation Essay

Descartes' Fourth Meditation, he begins with the assumption that God exists, is infallible, and is not a deceiver. While those assumptions may be subject to debate, for the purposes of the analyzing his argument, they will be taken as the truth. From those truths, Descartes takes several steps to arrive at the conclusion that human error is not the result of a failure of either the will or of intellect, but due to the fact that the will's scope is so much greater than the scope of the intellect, that the two are essentially incompatible. However, while this conclusion may seem satisfactory, when one examines the various steps in Descartes' argument, it becomes clear that he does not always use sound reasoning to come to that conclusion. The first mini-conclusion that Descartes reaches in his argument is to conclude that, because man has been created in God's image, mankind's judgment, if used correctly, is infallible. Even within the bounds of the idea of an all-knowing, omnipotent, all-loving God, the idea that a man created in God's image must be infallible seems unlikely. After all, even if man has been created in God's image, a man clearly lacks some of the attributes of God. Mankind is mortal, which differs from God's image. Even the differences in intellect, appearance, and physical attributes between men suggest that while mankind, as a whole, may have been created in God's image, there is obviously room for variation in a number of different attributes. Descartes fails to address those differences. Certainly, God's perfection means that He is perfectly wise, perfectly beautiful, and...

The fact that humans naturally vary from him in those characteristics suggests that they might also naturally vary from him in infallibility.
Descartes next goes on to conclude that, despite being created in the image of an infallible God, human beings are fallible. However, Descartes notes that humans have a lack of absolute knowledge. That leads ones to question whether humans are actually fallible? Do human beings make mistakes in judgment and reasoning, or, given the information that they can obtain, are those mistakes actually examples of infallible logic and reasoning, but faulty knowledge. If human beings are coming to the correct conclusions given the knowledge that they have, does a mistake in judgment really indicate fallibility in logical reasoning? Therefore, the next assumption that Descartes makes, which is that humans must not be using their judgment correctly, seems unsupported by the evidence. After all, if one makes the best possible, most logical conclusion that one can make based upon the evidence one has in one's possession, that is not evidence that judgment has been used incorrectly, but could simply be evidence that one has received incorrect information.

Whether or not one buys into the Descartes' descriptions of human fallibility or that humans are not using their judgment correctly, one is forced to agree with his conclusion that humans do make errors. Some of these errors are mistakes that come from a simple lack of knowledge. The idea that the sun revolved around the earth was certainly a simple, logical conclusion for…

Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Descartes' Method of Doubt Right,
Words: 1422 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

Some of the reason for error, therefore, is not related to indifference or for not having enough time to fully consider some matter. Some of it is due to man's propensity to flaw, and to his limited ability (which is related to his limited mental and physical power). In addition to misinterpreting the nature of the relationship between intellect and free will, Descartes has incorrectly interpreted some of the most

Descartes' Method of Doubt and
Words: 1840 Length: 6 Document Type: Term Paper

Then, by beginning with the idea that there may or may not be a chair present at all, one can begin building on those truths that remain to establish more truths and eventually establish the presence of the chair. Descartes uses such reasoning not only to establish the presence of those things that can be verified by the use of the senses, but also to establish the existence of God

Descartes, Meditations the Strategy the
Words: 721 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

In other words, yes he has found doubt in everything, but he now sees that his finding doubt in everything is something. Because he doubts, he must exist! He could doubt everything his senses told him. He could even doubt he had a body. But he could not doubt he had a mind because if he did not have a mind, how could he doubt? The steps Descartes takes to

Descartes "Meditations..." Meditations on First
Words: 637 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

" With that statement, Descartes proves his five-step theory that proves he exists because he is, in his words, "a thinking thing." Third Meditation have explained at sufficient length the principal argument of which I make use in order to prove the existence of God," Descartes claims. He claims that the idea of God is placed in us by God and that, if he (Descartes) exists there must have been a

Descartes' Major Tenets Descartes Major Tenets Descartes
Words: 1302 Length: 4 Document Type: Research Paper

Descartes' Major Tenets Descartes Major Tenets Descartes was one of the most well-respected thinkers of his time, and he applied his special brand of logic to a wide-variety of disciplines, most notably mathematics and philosophy. The Cartesian approach to philosophy, like many approaches to philosophy, looked at the interaction of the mind and the brain. Were the mind and the brain one united organism, did they interact with one another, was one

Descartes Spinoza Descartes Vs. Spinoza
Words: 669 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

Spinoza defines "substance" as "what is in itself and is conceived through itself, i.e. that whose concept doesn't have to be formed out of the concept of something else." He defines "attribute" as "what the intellect perceives of a substance as constituting its essence." Spinoza sets up his argument for the nondivisibility of God by establishing that substances are exclusive. In Proposition 2, he establishes that "Two substances having different

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now