Derrida
Jacques Derrida deconstructs Jean-Jacques Rousseau to make two main points. First, language is at the most a representative reality. Language is, in Rousseau's terms, supplemental. It can only approximate reality and mediate the truth to which the writing points. Language is "the mirage of the thing...an intermediary...a middle term," (87). Immediate experience can never be fully communicated in any language, as language is by definition symbolic and therefore supplemental.
Second, writing cannot be separated from the subjective state of either the author or the reader. A writer and a reader are both constrained by their psychological background and their historical context. The way the author uses language will also alter the content of the text. A reader's interpretation of the same piece of writing will thus be many times removed from the ultimate reality. The act of literary criticism is what Derrida refers to as the "moment of doubling commentary," (89). Reading a text can never be "content with doubling the text" but is always commingled with subjective supplements (89).
Although Derrida's style of writing obfuscates the crux of his argument, it is precisely his muddled use of language that substantiates the author's central point: that language is inherently imprecise. Language renders reality in a mediated way. Writers do not offer an objective truth; they can only supplement reality with words. Likewise, the reader interprets the supplementary material and objectivity is impossible. I wholeheartedly agree with Derrida's analysis and his critique of Rousseau. I also appreciate Derrida's deconstruction of language as being representative of postmodern theory. The sort of pessimistic hyper-analysis that characterizes postmodernism is exemplified in Derrida's essay.
A also concur with Derrida's assessment that the reader cannot separate the writer from the writing. The historical context of the text always includes the psychoanalysis of the author. A writer is unconsciously bound by his or her background, values, culture, and psychological makeup. Derrida points this out convincingly in the essay, referring to Rousseau. Ultimately, Derrida deconstructs Rousseau stunningly, showing how reading cannot "double" a text any more than a text can double reality. Any critical assessment including my own reading of Derrida, signifies being removed many times from the original, absolute reality.
Works Cited
Derrida, Jacques. "The Play of Substitution."
This work provided an intensive discussion historical forces that were to lead to modern humanism but also succeeds in placing these aspects into the context of the larger social, historical and political milieu. . Online sources and databases proved to be a valid and often insightful recourse area for this topic. Of particular note is a concise and well-written article by Stephen Weldon entitled Secular Humanism in the United States.
Postmodernism, either with or without the hyphen, has become a one of the most talked about concepts in the last decades. Postmodern is one of the most utilized terms these days, so defining it could prove useful: In a literal sense it means that which comes after the modern, and this is how the term is generally used. One of the most important issues is to correctly evaluate the diversity
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now