Interfering with the courts, jailing someone without legal justification, detaining people without due process, manipulating the constitution for partisan advantage -- all these actions are seen as abuses of the Rule of Law.
In other words, the rule of law provides the normative structure that gives stability to the society. Therefore, deviations from the norms of the rule of law threaten the structure of a democratic society. Consequently, such deviations are only appropriate in the most exceptional of circumstances.
As the author of the above article states,
The Rule of Law is violated...when the norms that are applied by officials do not correspond to the norms that have been made public to the citizens, or when officials act on the basis of their own discretion rather than rules laid down in advance.
This also relates to the classical defence of the rule of law. This refers to the liberal, egalitarian and rational tendencies in political philosophy. More specifically it refers to the trend in Western thought towards a rationalistic ethos of thought and action, which stresses a reasoned and rational rather than an emotional or passionate approach to the law and society. We see this in Plato's ideal republic which was "... A construction of reason...one of the major concerns of the Republic was the development of leadership that would not corrupt and would remain subservient to its rational law."
This is also linked in Western thought to egalitarianism and the balance of power and class. In other words, "...the rule of law is a necessary & #8230;condition for most forms of liberalism that have dominated political thought since the enlightenment."
In the light of this trend in thought in the Western world the importance of the rule of law becomes clear as well as the inappropriateness of any deviation from this rule of law.
However while there is in principle are no theoretically conceivable situation where the rule of law would be appropriate, it can be argued that there are situations that place the rule of law into question and even doubt. It must be remembered that the rule of allow does not refer to specific laws but rather to an ethos and underlying principle of legal equality and fairness in society in general. An abrogation of the rule of law in principle therefore means that, "Such a society will quickly relapse into a state of arbitrary tyranny."
The essence of the rule of law is to ensure fair and egalitarian legal treatment, yet there may be situations where the rule of law is open to questioning on certain grounds; for example, where the rule of law appears to contradict essential human rights or prohibit individual freedom unnecessarily.
An example from the human rights arena may serve to illustrate this point. While a central aspect and function of the rule of law is to enable the ordinary citizen to enforce their rights, yet in some countries this has not been a characteristic feature of the rule of law. A good example in this regards is South Africa. As de Vos (2009) states,
... In South Africa most people -- let alone poor people -- do not have the money needed to pay for lawyers that would enforce their rights and entitlements in court. A poor person who enters into a verbal contract with someone who fails to honour his or her word, will not be assisted by the law if the powerful contractee just ignores his or her obligations. Neither will such a person have much chance to challenge an unjust, unfair or unconstitutional decision by a state official to stop her pension, evict her from her shack or confiscate her goats -- simply because such a person will not be able to pay lawyers to represent him or her.
As referred to, there are some extreme situations when the rule of law may be deviated from. These include extreme events such as disasters and terrorist attacks; for example, the terrorist attacks of September, 2001, and Hurricane Katrina. These events "... imposed tremendous pressure on the rule of law and, in the case of Hurricane Katrina, the justice system literally collapsed."
However, it is asserted that even in times of disaster the rule of law must be preserved.
The issue of terrorism and the rule of law have raised some controversial issues. One of these is that "The tragic events in New York and Washington on 11 September 2001 may have made liberal democratic societies, such as Australia, realise the importance of protection through government as well as protection from government."
This has resulted in proposed legislation which allows for the holding of suspected terrorists for 48 hours without any legal justification. This is a deviation from the rule of law but it is considered necessary due to the radically changing political situation in the world. This refers to the point made above that the rule of law also has to flexible and adaptable to changing circumstances. The rationale from this deviation from the rule of law is as follows:
The protection of Australian lives from the very real threat of terrorism is now, possibly more than ever, considered a top priority. Protection from such a realistic threat is a higher priority than the protection of one person's freedom...
The definition for "subversives" is a bit vague, but Fagen explains that in Argentina and elsewhere in Latin American dictatorships the victims of violent repression tended to be union leaders, liberal political leaders, artistic people in cultural circles, student protest leaders and media personalities (p. 41). The whole point of these horrendous repressive policies was to inspire fear, confusion and "distrust" among the general population. For those who believe the
Death Penalty Is Fair The Death Penalty Is a Fair Punishment for Murder Arguements have been raised concerning death penalty for a long time now. A lot of people consider death penalty as an immoral, or an unreasonable punishment. (Messerli, 2007) Despite the fact that the death sentences were a constant element of society in the past, which actually initiated from lynching and ended in the modern capital punishment and is still
For example, the Parliament passed the "Year and a Day Rule" Act in 1996 that changed the previous murder and manslaughter law that specified that a person could be charged with murder or manslaughter if the victim died within a year and a day of receiving his injuries. The change was made to reflect modern development in medical science, which enabled injured people to remain alive for longer periods. Changes
Psychology Daycare centers are lifesavers for many families, and are especially helpful for working single mothers. The bonding between parent and child during infancy and toddler years is of the utmost importance; however, children who spend some time in daycare centers are not necessarily deprived of this love and affection. Rather, mothers who work will feel even more willing to care for and nurture their children after returning home from work,
Even thenm once in a while the heads of the more powerful families would meet to work out differences (Meltzer, 1990, pp. 40-41). Still, striking at the mob could not be effected easily by the use of normal investigative methods alone. Indeed, the failure of the FBI to use even those methods in a concerted manner is noted by Kessler (2002), who reports that Hoover usually claimed that the FBI
In managing a multinational company in the food products industry, it is essential to implement a solid knowledge management system to ensure that as much relevant information as possible is handled in the most effective manner. Issues that must be addressed to ensure the safety of the product and that optimum delivery to consumers is possible include: sanitation, where workers may eat and drink, conflict resolution, how in-house teams will
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now