Verified Document

Deontological Ethics And Utilitarianism Term Paper

Utilitarianism is a consequentialist ethical framework. The consequences of an action are more important than the motivations behind the action or the action itself. An action has "utility" if it serves the greatest good. The basic principle of utilitarianism is creating the greatest good for the greatest number of people, or the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. The ethics of utilitarianism differ from ethical egoism in that the individual may make a sacrifice for the common good because it is the aggregate of happiness/goodness that matters, not maximizing individual happiness. Central to utilitarianism is the belief that all people are inherently equal and of equal consideration when making ethical decisions (p. 55). John Stuart Mill outlined the core tenets of utilitarianism, which became a fundamental component of Enlightenment political philosophy. Another utilitarian philosopher, Jeremy Bentham, proposed a happiness calculus that can be used to more rigorously apply utilitarian philosophy to decision-making. Using a happiness calculus presumably quantifies the amount of happiness that might result from performing or not performing a certain action. The happiness calculus also shows that the theory of utilitarianism can be applied conversely: an act is ethical if it minimizes pain for the maximum number of people, or causes the least pain for the least number of people. Pleasure and pain can theoretically be quantified in terms of intensity, duration, likeliness of the desired results, and also fruitfulness or meaningfulness (p. 59). The latter concept, fruitfulness, implies...

The fleeting happiness that comes from eating ice cream is less fruitful than the longer lasting happiness of being healthy.
Bentham, Mill, and other proponents of utilitarianism also distinguish between the quality of pleasure and the quantity of pleasure. All aspects of happiness can potentially be quantified or measured, including fruitfulness. Thus, happiness can be quantified in terms of its duration, how many people are happy, or how likely the outcome is to occur. The quality of happiness is far more subjective; but from Mill's point-of-view, intellectual pleasures are superior to the pleasures of the flesh. The pleasure of solving a problem is qualitatively better than the pleasure gained from watching a sitcom.

Utilitarianism can be loosely divided into rule-based utilitarianism and act utilitarianism. Rule utilitarianism allows for broader ethical codes based on certain rules of behavior. Act utilitarianism uses situational constraints to show that individual acts should be judged on their own merits, and that each situation needs to be judged individually.

Reflection

While the happiness calculus is certainly not scientific, utilitarianism itself remains one of the most relevant and effective tools for ethical decision-making. Utilitarianism coincides with libertarianism and the empowerment of the individual to make decisions without ascribing to some absolute moral code of behavior. Utilitarianism also liberates the individual from the senselessness of total selfishness, as acting in self-interest rarely produces a net positive outcome given the social nature of human existence. There are some problems with utilitarianism with regard to how happiness can be measured, and also with regard to the fact that the greatest good for the greatest number of people tends to neglect that small minority of those who will not benefit from the action. In the real world, though, no act can please every person a hundred percent of the time. Moreover, utilitarianism can be misused. As a consequentialist theory, utilitarianism can suggest for example that the "ends justifies the means," (p. 61). If misused, utilitarianism could justify heinous acts committed against a minority of people in order to serve the best interests of a majority. Nevertheless, utilitarianism provides a meaningful and effective framework for good judgment.

2.…

Sources used in this document:
Works Cited

MacKinnon, Barbara and Fiala, Andrew. Ethics. 8th edition. Cengage.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Deontological Ethics in Vocational Dilemmas
Words: 558 Length: 2 Document Type: Case Study

This exposes another weakness of the deontological approach: it provides no guidance for determining which of two contradictory rules must be respected. If the supervisor respects the company rule prohibiting disclosing the information to the employee, he must violate the general moral rule prohibiting lying. Conversely, if the supervisor respects the general moral rule about lying, he must violate the company policy about non-disclosure. In this particular scenario, the supervisor

Ethics Utilitarianism Is One of the Most
Words: 650 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Ethics Utilitarianism is one of the most useful ethical theories. It can frame decisions made in almost every aspect of daily life, and also large-scale decisions made by organizations, enterprises, and governments. The basic principles of utilitarianism, as they were developed first by Jeremy Bentham and later by John Stuart Mill, are all based in the essential notion of utility. Utility means usefulness, but it is also related to net benefit. Utility

Deontological Ethics and Law
Words: 1637 Length: 5 Document Type: Essay

Ethics and morality feature strongly in Twain's Huckleberry Finn. Set against a backdrop of antebellum social stratification, the novel shows how individuals like the title character make their moral choices. Moreover, Huckleberry Finn is a coming-of-age story showing how the title character discovers his own moral voice. His deepening friendship with Jim, and the conflicts that friendship cause him due to race relations in the antebellum south, help Huckleberry Finn

Deontological Ethics
Words: 760 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

I have two thoughts regarding your narrative about duty. The first is that I see your point with respect to people having different ideas about what their duty might be towards others. Holly and yourself are described as having different ideas about what her duty towards Chelsea should be. That's a valid point – if we are to use a deontological framework then that assumes that we all have roughly

Difference Between Teleological and Deontological Ethics
Words: 732 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

ethics, teleology refers to consequentialist ethics, in which the morality of an action is based on its consequences rather than on the nature of the act itself. Utilitarianism is a type of teleological ethics, because utilitarianism is based on creating the maximum amount of happiness (or some other predetermined desirable outcome such as prosperity or health) for the most people possible. Ethical egoism, the view that benefitting the self

Utilitarianism, Deontology, Virtue Ethics Essay: The Similarities
Words: 710 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Utilitarianism, Deontology, Virtue Ethics Ethics essay: The similarities and differences between utilitarianism, deontological ethics, and virtue ethics Utilitarianism is the philosophy that all ethical decisions must strive to do 'the greatest good for the greatest number of people.' In this ethical system, the ethical actor functions as a moral observer, dispassionately making decisions without regard to him or herself or his or her personal investment in the decision. Utilitarianism is a system

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now