Democracy
In a fair and free election, the resultant outcome comes from the majority ruling of votes. In an ideal democratic environment, such votes are the consequence of all participant voters -- the legitimate populace as allowed for such voting -- and thus officials are elected in service of the majority of the peoples. However, this utopic democracy is limited in that not all participant voters are knowledgeable in decisions affecting themselves and affecting the government. The other branch of democracy -- one of polyarchy -- calls for the distribution of power within a selective few branches, with which to run government. This is only a minimal progression out of the term "monarchy." Why not, then, a view of democracy that encompass both types of governance -- one in which the population is allowed election of those numerous knowledgeable representatives with the proper background into voting for the electoral democracy? That is, make minimalist, slightly liberal democracy the perfect democracy.
There are three types of democracies to be discussed in this paper: the polyarchal democracy conceptualized by Robert Dahl, pluralism as described by Nicholas Miller, and the minimalist and extended liberal democracy as argued and defended by Adam Przeworski, James S. Fishkin, and Larry Diamond. Each type of democracy contains many basic human rights as pertaining to the subject of liberty and freedom. The manner of election and governance between the three ultimately differ, however. There are downsides to all three, with major setbacks in the outcomes of the former two democracies mentioned. Thus, the lesser evil to be obtained would be to take the liberal, minimalistic view of said democracies.
Polyarchal Democracy
Robert Dahl's polyarchy is a "state of affairs constituting a limit, and all actions approaching the limit will be maximizing actions." In his definition of the best democracy, the populace is allowed its voting rights, though the voting results in the investiture of power within more than one person -- though not succinctly similar to "of the people." The voting process has its limits,...
Democracy in Tunisia Democratization is a process that involves a transition advocated by either people, or political leaders who eliminate authoritarian systems and created democratic systems of government. However, in most cases, the people initiated the change, which the political leaders had no, option, but join the people (Huntington 109). Owing to the many forms of democratic regimes, variations are inevitable. Some of the regimes include parliamentary and presidential regimes. Some
The fall of the Berlin Wall would show the genuine commitment to that goal as those recently liberated coalesced to the democratic orientation of the larger nation. For Russia, by contrast, a public's absence of exposure to the systems and conditions of democracy has rendered a people today deeply susceptible to exploitation, with the current Russian leader, former chief of the Soviet KGB, Vladamir Putin, imposing suppression of political opposition, journalistic freedom and social liberties. Here,
If the context, nation, or order centers on a group of people who have either lost interest in political ideology, or desire to share in the common decision process, then they are not truly represented. This could result in the lack of an appeal of voting, to be involved in litigation, or the lack of proper representation. "In societies where some form of elitism is institutionalized, there democracy cannot
P). Regarding freedom of association, the same concerns itself with permitting people in a given society to collectively defend, pursue as well as express those interests they regard or consider common. This freedom by virtue of inclusion into various human rights instruments as well as constitutions is considered one of the basic freedoms. Sometimes used synonymously with freedom of assembly, freedom of expression could also entail the freedom to gather for
The Prime Minister of the country was for example under extreme pressure to prove that the elections could be run in a perfectly democratic manner. However, when democracy was not in his favor, violent measures were taken and a reelection demanded to manipulate the results. The reaction of all involved parties to all the actions taken by the Prime Minister and his ruling party were negative and heavily oppositional. This
Africa - Politics Africa and democracy haven't always been two words that go together well, because following the colonization of much of Africa, democracies were established but they struggled (and sometimes failed) to become stable -- and many continue to struggle today. This paper reviews the democratic movements in Africa, some of which failed, and some have succeeded. This paper also projects the success or failure of future democracies in Africa. What
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now