Deficit and Economy
Today, economists generally agree that high budget deficits reduce the ability of the economy to grow in the future. So, the general question is, why do high budget deficits matter? In order to understand this, we need to understand the concepts of economic growth and decline. What is economic growth: "Economic growth occurs primarily with the increase in value of goods and services produced by an economy" (Case et. al, 2009) while growth measurement" happens through the computation of the percentage increase in inflation adjusted, real growth in Gross Domestic Product" (Case et. al, 2009). Furthermore, the GDP is "the total market value of all final goods and services produced in a country in a given year, equal to total consumer, investment and government spending, plus the value of exports, minus the value of imports" (Case et. al, 2009). Therefore, we can define an economic slowdown in opposite terms, meaning, goods and services produced decline, inflation becomes a product, and the GDP thus slows down. So, how do high budget deficits interact with the economic downturn? Periods of economic growth and prosperity are generally defined by the amount of money present and available in a given economy. Therefore, when the deficit is high, less money is available to the public, and this can create real problems. If there is less money circulating in individual industries, the economic situation can take a downward spiral, because the money simply isn't there for individuals to spend on goods and services to stimulate the economy further. This concept is illustrated in President Obama's initial plan to increase economic growth, which actually increased the deficit, but provided more money to the economy through circulation and various government programs. While the effort to place more money in circulation is certainly commendable, the fact that the program also increased the deficit means that in the long run, it cannot and will not solve the problem of less money in circulation. Therefore, this concept helps to demonstrate that the federal government's high national deficit does much to decrease money available in the economy, thus causing economic downturn and affecting various aspects like employment, credit, and the stock market.
The problem of the massive deficit spirals downwards onto individuals in all aspects and classes of society. With less money available, there are generally then less jobs available, since managers lack the funds and abilities to pay employees. This factor then creates a further downward spiral, because without jobs fewer people are able to afford different goods and services, and then even less money winds up in circulation. The more money we burrow as a nation, the less money we are actually able to implement into circulation and this only further devastates the economy.
However, one question remains; if we are burrowing more money, why is it not thus present in our economy? Where is it going? Shouldn't it be circulating somewhere in our country? The answer is no; it is not circulating in our country. If we take a close look at George Bush's 2008 and 2009 budget plans, we can see why. An enormous amount of spending went to fund the Iraq War, and the continuous presence of troops in Afghanistan is also a huge war time expense. As most wars generally are to state budgets (a clear example that comes to mind is Loius XVI's participation in the American Revolution which eventually destroyed the French Budget and the monarchy), the Iraqi War has been a huge cause of the high deficit, and thus former President Bush has received increasing amounts of criticism for his spending due to the economic downturn (much like Louis XVI did).
While we are not currently seeing the political instability and economic crisis in an angry, bloodthirsty way as it was presented during the French Revolution, the general panic and decay of society in both circumstances is an important factor of comparison. For instance, Louis XVI's large national deficit meant that he did not have the ability to provide funds for work programs, to charities, and to other causes that may otherwise have helped to alleviate the situation. It also meant that individuals continued to lose work and starve, because less and less money was in circulation. France had borrowed the money only to invest it in the American War, not to invest it in its own country's economy. Basically, America, with the Iraqi War, has done the same thing, and therefore done much to create its own financial problems. This burrowed money is gone now; it is not...
Macroeconomics Budget deficits today will tend to lower the rate of growth in the economy in the future. Budget deficits result in higher rates of public debt. While the U.S. borrows at very low rates, it nevertheless must pay interest on its debt, and it is that interest that represents a burden on future growth. What happens is that future tax receipts must be used to pay interest and principle on
"Opening up the financial system to foreign capital flows can lead, and has led, to disastrous financial crises, which have resulted in great pain, suffering and even violence" (Mishkin, 2006, p.9). Directly linked to the previous disadvantage and the basic definition of globalization, is the fact that the interdependence of sectors and institutions increases in a global market. In this instance then, a financial crisis within one country or within
China and the World Trade Organization On December 11, 2001, China officially became a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO), opening the country's doors to change and a new economy. One year after china's entry into the WTO, the country reported great success, showing better-than-expected economic growth and fulfillment of its WTO commitments, despite the shaky world economy. The excellent performance of the Chinese economy was clearly demonstrated by its 8% growth
While it was generally agreed that the increase in prices was due mainly to an insufficient offer as the stock house was limited, opinions have also been forwarded according to which the buy-to-let purchases have contributed to the inflation of the house prices (Property Mark). The debate concerning the reasons for the massive price increases for residential properties (materialized mostly between 1996 and 2005) is however still ongoing. On the
ECB can be successful at emulating the strategic model set forth by the German Bundesbank. The discussion will focus on the fact that the ECB is facing different problems as it is still in the developmental phases. The investigation will seek to determine whether the tools of the Bundesbank can provide support for the ECB in achieving economic stability in the European Monetary Union. Research about this particular topic is
presidential election of 1992 was a tight race, compared to others in history. The struggle between the Clinton camp, which focused on a platform involving the economy, the Bush camp, who focused on a platform whose basis was trust and taxes, and the Perot camp, who relied on a business-style economic platform, all combined to form one of the most interesting and changing races in recent years. This paper
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now