Verified Document

Deception By Law Enforcement Officers Term Paper

Deception has been utilized as one of the most valuable tools in investigative processes by law enforcement officers. This tool has been utilized in the criminal justice field for more than a century because of the view that its useful in helping investigative officers in uncovering the truth. As a result, investigative officers commonly utilize deception to conduct investigations, interrogations and in the testimonial process to help uncover the truth relating to the case/issue being investigated. However, the use of deception by investigating officers during investigation, interrogation and in the testimonial process has generated significant ethical concerns. Actually, this practice has generated two juxtaposing ethical behaviors that are characterized with significant ethical concerns in the criminal justice field. Investigative officers are encouraged and allowed to use deception and lie when carrying out investigations and interrogations in order to uncover the truth and eventually seek justice. This paper examines the ethics of deception by investigating officers with respect to the difference between deontological and ontological ethics. Ethics of Lying

The use of deception by investigative officers during investigations, interrogations, and testimonial processes is an age-old practice in the criminal justice field. These officers are permitted and encouraged to use deception and lie in order to uncover the truth that will help in delivery of justice by the criminal justice system. This practice obtained significant relevance in the United States in 1969 in the Supreme court’s ruling in Frazier v. Cupp, a case that involved the interrogation of a homicide suspect. During the interrogation, the investigative officer lied to the homicide suspect that an accomplice has already implicated him in the murder. Due to the lie, the suspect was convinced to confess to the homicide (John E. Reid & Associates, n.d.). In its ruling in the case, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the use of deceit and trickery by investigative officers during investigations and interrogations...

Moreover, the Court ruled that such trickery and deceit is allowed based on the totality of the surrounding circumstances and events. In the modern criminal justice system, investigative officers are not permitted by courts to use deception and lie, but are also trained to do that. Modern investigative officers can engage in deception to obtain the truth through using various techniques like undercover agents, wiretaps, and informants.
Even though the use of deception and lying remains an age-old practice in the criminal justice system, it has raised numerous ethical concerns. The major ethical issue/concern surrounding this practice is whether it’s ethical to lie or use deception to obtain the truth and whether the end justifies the means in that case. The ethical approach adopted by many people in the society is absolute moral rules in which lying is considered as unethical and unacceptable. However, absolute moral rules are not applicable in all situations because such rules could be utilized to harm others. For instance, if telling the truth would cause severe injury or death of another, lying could be considered acceptable because it would help save a life. Absolute moral rules are based on deontological ethics, which is based on the belief that why and how you do something is more important than its results (Bayley, 2010). In this regard, it would be unethical to lie to obtain the truth since lying is morally wrong and unacceptable.

However, ontological ethics provides a different perspective since its based on unity between the real and the ideal. In this regard, ethical decisions are made based on reason and to unite the real and ideal. In this scenario, the ideal thing would be for investigative officers not to lie or use deception. However, the real scenario is that the use of deception or lie by these officers help in obtaining the truth and ensuring justice is delivered. Therefore, it is ethical for investigation officers to use deception or lie in order to…

Sources used in this document:

References

Alpert, G.P. & Noble, J.J. (2008, November 17). Lies, True Lies, and Conscious Deception. Police Quarterly, 1-18. Retrieved from https://www.nlg-npap.org/sites/default/files/AlpertandNobleLies.pdf

Bayley, B. (2010, February 12). Noble Cause Corruption: Do the Ends Justify the Means? Retrieved November 10, 2017, from https://www.policeone.com/chiefs-sheriffs/articles/2003646-Noble-cause-corruption-Do-the-ends-justify-the-means/

Ciske, M. (2009, June 27). The Ethics of Police Deception. Retrieved from The Institute of Applied & Professional Ethics – Ohio University website: https://www.ohio.edu/ethics/1999-conferences/the-ethics-of-police-deception/index.html

John E. Reid & Associates. (n.d.). Lying to a Suspect: How Far Can an Investigator Go? Retrieved November 10, 2017, from http://policelink.monster.com/training/articles/1911-lying-to-a-suspect-how-far-can-an-investigator-go

 


Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Ethics in Law Enforcement "Sometimes Police Officers
Words: 1373 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

Ethics in Law Enforcement "Sometimes [police officers] may, and sometimes may not, lie when conducting custodial interrogations. Investigative and interrogatory lying are each justified on utilitarian crime control grounds. Police are never supposed to lie as witnesses in the courtroom, although they may lie for utilitarian reasons similar to those permitting deception & #8230;" (Skolnick, et al., 1992) Is it ethical for law enforcement officers to use deception during the interrogation process?

Developing Ethical Leaders in Law Enforcement
Words: 1297 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

Developing Ethical Leaders in Law Enforcement At any point in time but especially during periods of social and political unrest, American citizens look to law enforcement authorities to provide them with the informed guidance and support they need to navigate their ways through these challenging times successfully. It is therefore incumbent upon law enforcement agencies at every level to create an organizational culture that places a high priority of ethical policing

Vagueness of Law Enforcement Ethics Code
Words: 669 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Law Enforcement Code of Ethics" is deliberately written to be vague. The reason for this is obvious. There are plenty of practices employed by law enforcement on a daily basis that are widespread and are not actually illegal, but that would not be considered ethical even under the most sloppily-enunciated and lax ethical code. Everyone in law enforcement knows this fact, as does every defense attorney; pretty much everyone

Ethics in Law Enforcement
Words: 2406 Length: 8 Document Type: Essay

Ethics in Law Enforcement Ethics are what almost anyone would define as a person's determination between what is good or bad, or more accurately what is right or wrong. Although many of these attitudes can be a product of parenting or other factors in one's maturing environment, ethical decisions could also be a product of environmental factors that are outside of the control of individuals. It is difficult to determine where

Law Enforcement and Police
Words: 718 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Police Use 'Fake News' in Sting Aimed at California Gang," ABC news reporter Melley (2016) describes a recent and unusual tactic used by Santa Monica Police Chief Ralph Martin. The story details how Police Chief Martin issued a press release that was picked up by the Santa Monica Sun. The press release said that two gang members had been arrested. It later turned out the press release was false,

Deception in Police Investigation Deception
Words: 1796 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

He quotes the claims that they customarily begin with the demand "If you know what's good for you, you'll confess," and cites various experts in criminal law enforcement who state that police "con" and "bull*****" their suspects, that they use coercion, deception and are not willing to change. He counters this last assertion by claiming that historically, American police have made radical changes in their tactics and must certainly

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now