What is interesting to be noticed is that even in the beginning of the book, when presenting the racial segregation at the high school in Little Rock, Allen does not turn to religion to explain or condemn the practice, but to the social principles of the Greek philosopher (Morris, 2006).
Some of these principles promoted by Aristotle and used by Danielle Allen could be succinctly presented as follows:
fluidity of our conceptual universe the power / or lack of power of persuasion the art of generating trust the difference between means and intentions friendship and justice - "if men are friends, there is no need for justice between them whereas merely to be just is not enough - it is also necessary to be friends" (Allen 2004 quoting Aristotle) - friendship is hereby presented in terms of politics, not just social virtues the interchangeability of friendship and successful citizenship liberality, magnanimity, courage interaction, speech, living together with strangers and acquaintances" (Allen, 2004)
The author of Talking to Strangers looks at the works of Aristotle through the lens of the Plato's writings and compares the two. Aristotle for instance argues the existence of an art to generate trust, whereas Plato does not believe in it. Their opinions also vary relative to the power of persuasion.
Another relevant source is Martin Luther King's Letter from a Birmingham Jail, from which Allen adopts the concepts of social equality, based on a chain of mutual responsibilities and obligations. Given this chain, the members of society would be better able to interact and trust one another, taking one more step towards the society of civil democracy. The same idea was used by Martin Luther King, but instead of chain of mutual obligations, he refers to the social connectivity as an "inescapable network of mutuality," bringing Americans together at all times. Allen embraces this vision and further states that achieving it requires the individual sacrifice of all society members.
The historic views of Martin Luther King are also revealed by the mentioning of the "I Have a Dream" speech. In this, King spoke about the equal rights of blacks and whites, and the hope that one day the black men and women would enjoy the same rights as the white men and women. He believed that a stable society could not be reached unless this day comes. "There will be neither rest nor tranquillity in America until the Negro is granted his citizenship rights. The whirlwinds of revolt will continue to shake the foundations of our nation until the bright day of justice emerges" (Allen 2004 quoting Martin Luther King).
Aside Plato, Aristotle and Martin Luther King, the UPS Founding Professor also uses the historical approach to the writing of Jurgen Habermas and Thomas Hobbes, coming to disagree with both authors. Habermas militates for a "disinterested communication" and Hobbes states that life is "nasty, brutish and short." "She (Danielle Allen) quickly but persuasively concludes that such "disinterested communication" is of no real assistance in the resolution of conflict. For Allen, Thomas Hobbes and his view that life is "nasty, brutish, and short" in societies without strong government fares far better than Habermas's perspectives as intellectual building blocks. In the end, however, she insists that Habermas's preoccupation with institutional strictures misses the importance of expressive and persuasive communication" (Morris, 2006).
The conclusions of the numerous observations made point out to a need to renounce the old habits and replace them with new ones. These old habits refer to behavioural patterns, actions or reactions within social interactions. The need to adopt new techniques is explained by the fact that newer approaches to the civil society would:
increase the trust among society members ensure the equality and equal rights of all members of the civil society social prosperity and understanding can only be accomplished through sacrifice (Agamemnon's sacrifice of his daughter for the benefit of the community) ultimately, we would be able to achieve the model of a democratic...
Friendship in Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring The Lord of the Rings embodies friendship and its importance through the many relations among its stimulating characters. Tolkien truly lives vicariously through his creations by emphasizing on companionship throughout the course of the epic fantasy. Relations such as those between Sam and Frodo, Gandalf and Aragorn and Legolas and Gimli, prove time and time again how friendship indeed was
This is what the friendship between Gilgamesh and Enkidu represents. Thus, during the friendship of Gilgamesh and Enkidu, the two engage in numerous adventures, often dangerous in nature. For example, Enkidu assists Gilgamesh in his fight against Humbaba, the guardian monster of the Cedar Forest. Even though Enkidu does not agree with the actions, he nonetheless cooperates with Gilgamesh in successfully defeating and killing Humbaba. He later assists Gilgamesh with
Aristotle's Friendships Elena Irrera interprets Aristotle's Nichomachean Ethics on friendship as having three distinct, but possibly overlapping purposes. In addition to friendships based on love, there are also friendships based on "ethical excellence" and "utility" (p. 7). Friendships based on love can be rooted in a mutual sense of understanding and trust, and are typically rooted in a long history of companionship. Friendships based on ethical excellence are more difficult to
The mentor guides and counsels and takes an interest in the younger person, and is inspired by seeing the trainee succeed. This may occur in the workforce, in the classroom between teacher and pupil, and even in cross-generational friendships. This mentoring relationship may have some overlap with friends who are also family members. One of the proudest things any parent can boast is that his or her child is a
Plato, Augustine and Montaigne all define friendship in different ways, though they share many similarities. Augustine, for instance, defined it in terms of the ultimate aim of man as a Christian, which is to be united to God: a friend was thus one who assisted or supported the development of that holy union. Plato viewed friendship in a more philosophical (and less theological vein) but nonetheless defined it as one
Huck Finn The Friendship of Huck and Jim As Huck and Jim drift on to Cairo, Huck begins to feel that Jim is displaying more hubris than a runaway slave should. His "civilized" self begins to come to the surface and he contemplates turning Jim in as it would be the "right" thing to do -- after all, Jim does belong to Miss Watson and not to himself. The struggle in Huck
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now