Verified Document

Daimler-Chrysler- Case Study Corporate Marriages Have Become Case Study

Daimler-Chrysler- Case Study Corporate marriages have become so problematic in recent times that it no longer generates a shocking response from the analysts at Wall Street if a merger fails. We witnessed some of the classic merger downfalls in 1990s when many large companies decided to merge their businesses mainly because of poor economic conditions. Because of these failures and the many stories surrounding rapid collapse of corporate marriages, the public along with Wall Street analysts more or less has stopped reacting to such news. Still, the news that Daimler-Chrysler merger was facing deep problems generated a massive response from Wall Street observers who were keenly anticipating some positive news. Everyone had believed that it was a 'merger of the equals' since both companies ranked very high in their respective areas of expertise.

Things should have worked out well because there were apparent no clash of interests. Daimler Benz was basically a well-known producer of luxury cars and Chrysler was a truck company that excelled in minivans and sport utilities. On the surface everything looked smooth. The $40 billion merger was to create the third largest automobile company in the world after GM and Ford. This was in itself a huge achievement for the two firms that couldn't hope to beat the market leaders on their own. CEOs of the two companies Jurgen Schrempp of Daimler-Benz and Eaton of Chrysler knew their firms had much to gain from the merger. The conditions in the industry had not been encouraging in the past few years and demand was sluggish. Secondly with the merger, both companies could easily gain access to both European and Americans markets.

In short, "prospects for the merger looked good. Because of the two companies' complementary product ranges, regional concentrations, and capabilities, its logic was acclaimed by both investors and auto industry analysts. The extent of the companies' pre-merger and post-merger planning...

Under the vision of "one company, one vision, one chairman, two cultures," the merged company established an elaborate structure of joint Chrysler-Daimler integration teams which began work on reconciling and integrating almost every aspect of the two companies development, technology, operations, and marketing with a view to achieving the $3 billion in cost savings that the merger anticipated."
The great Daimler-Chrysler however ran into problems within the very first year of their merger when many senior executives of Chrysler left the firm and there were widespread rumors of internal clashes. And the fact that Chrysler was hit the hardest left many analysts wondering if it was actually a merger of equals. Within a year, Chrysler profits and Daimler-Chrysler's share prices dropped significantly and problems arising from the merger became obvious. Not only the senior executives of Chrysler had left, every other aspect of the post-merger period proved that Chrysler was literally being ruled by Daimler and it was not a merger but rather an acquisition. It is important therefore to analyze the problems in order to reach the root cause of post merger troubles at Daimler-Chrysler.

The biggest problem that arises when two large corporations marry is the clash of cultures. With distinctive internal cultures, the two firms are bound to run into management related problems, as management and employees are usually unfamiliar with the way the other firm conducts business. Management strategies differ significantly and this causes a wide gap to emerge between objectives, goals and vision of the two firms. These problems compounded at Daimler-Chrysler because of general differences in German and American approach to various strategic problems.

While Germans are obsessed with planning, Americans are risk-takers. When they saw an opportunity, management at Chrysler would take the plunge without going…

Sources used in this document:
For people like Rudiger Grube, it wasn't important whether the company had foreseen the new opportunities or seized them in time, rather it was more critical to meet the schedule and ensure deadlines were strictly followed. His main responsibility was to plan, oversee and evaluate the integration process. While there was nothing wrong with Grube's approach and his strategy for post merger integration, people at Chrysler resisted since they had not been accustomed to this European management model. The problems that we noticed in the profits of Chrysler and in the overall post-merger integration process were grounded in Chrysler's inability to understand European style of management and in Daimler's refusal to accept the cultural differences that existed between the two firms.

These management problems however were not the only factor affecting Chrysler's dwindling profits. The general conditions in the automobile industry had a bearing on Chrysler's performance. The major problem with the world automobile industry is grounded in production and capacity issues. The industry, which is highly competitive with key players struggling to increase their market share, is suffering due to over production. Over supply of vehicles has seriously affected growth of the automobile industry as demand has more or less remained static. In the coming years, however the demand is expected to decrease further as ever expanding capacity of major automobile firms. Table 4.12 shows how automobile firms in the U.S., Asia and Western Europe are increasing their production capacity. Without considering the sluggish demand, these firms have continued to expand the utilization percentage of their production capacity. For example the firms in the U.S. were utilizing 81.2% of their capacity in 200, up from 76.8% in 1998. similarly, automobile companies in Western Europe had increased utilization to 71.8% from 71.5% within two years. Asia had followed suit with utilization rate going up to 64.55% in 200 from 61.2% in 1998.

Problems have continued to mount at Daimler-Chrysler and it is therefore important for the strategic planners to recognize the key factors influencing the firm's performance. Apart from internal cultural clash, there are other forces, which are negatively affecting Daimler-Chrysler merger. These include general issues faced by the automobile industry such as low demand and increased supply, convergence of design and technologies, rapid disappearance of small automobile producers and a general trend towards globalization and investment.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Daimler a Long and Tangled History the
Words: 3933 Length: 13 Document Type: Essay

Daimler A Long and Tangled History The Daimler car company, under various different names and throughout various configurations, has been around almost as long as the history of the automobile itself. It has seen good times -- including some very good times -- as well as some very troubled times. While Daimler, like any other company, has been to some extent purely at the mercy of chance and external forces, it has

Challenge of Managing All Stakeholders in the Context of a Merger...
Words: 23212 Length: 80 Document Type: Term Paper

Managing All Stakeholders in the Context of a Merger Process Review of the Relevant Literature Types of Mergers Identifying All Stakeholders in a Given Business Strategic Market Factors Driving Merger Activity Selection Process for Merger Candidates Summary, Conclusion, and Recommendations The Challenge of Managing All Stakeholders in the Context of a Merger Process Mergers and acquisitions became central features of organizational life in the last part of the 20th century, particularly as organizations seek to establish and

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now