Good Comparison?
The comparison between the Reichstag building in Berlin and the town of Grindelwald in Switzerland is intriguing, but it requires much more consideration to understand the cultural symbolism of these two different contexts.
First off, the Reichstag building is a symbol of German history and brings to mind a range of historical events and ideological movements, from the rise of the Third Reich to the rebuilding of a democratic Germany. However, associating the Reichstag's symbolism with that of Grindelwald in Switzerland oversimplifies the nature of historical representation. The Reichstag is a symbol of political meaning full of social symbols (Taylor, 2000).
In contrast, Grindelwald represents natural beauty and tranquility, a symbol of the Swiss commitment to preserving their natural environment and a testament to values like peace and stability. Duncan (1988) rightly points out that landscapes are often interpreted through cultural lenses, but equating Grindelwalds symbolism with the Reichstag's is too simplistic. Grindelwald's symbolism is rooted more in geographical and environmental contexts, whereas the Reichstag's is rooted more in political history.
Plus, the idea that landscapes or buildings can be universally interpreted or compared is problematic. As Duncan and Duncan (1988) suggest, landscapes are read through...
…viewer's cultural background and historical knowledge. This subjectivity in interpretation means that one can certainly draw parallels between different symbols, but that these are not universally applicable or necessarily truly similar at all.Finally, the comparison with the history of slavery in the United States and its recognition and condemnation is another misstep. Germany's handling of its political past and the United States' struggle with its history of slavery touch on some chapters of history that make some uncomfortable, but the nature of these histories and how they are remembered and taught differ for a lot of people. The mechanisms of remembrance…
References
Barkan, E. (2000). The Guilt of Nations: Restitution and Negotiating Historical Injustices. W.W.
Norton & Company.
Duncan, J., & Duncan, N. (1988). (Re)Reading the Landscape. Environment and Planning D:
Society and Space, 6(2), 117-126. https://doi-org.ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/10.1068/d060117Links to an external site.
Historic Buildings The British Museum and the Reichstag in Berlin have many similarities. Both of these historic buildings have undergone facelifts recently, and Lord Norman Foster and Partners Architects created both of these facelifts. Both of the buildings feature domes or cupolas, and both have modern elements Foster created to blend naturally with their historic natures. Both of the buildings have features that draw the viewers' eye to the top
After the initial frustration of the reparations crisis subsided in 1923, cooler heads prevailed for a time and the Weimar Republic started to address its immediate economic problems. The Weimar solved the fiscal crisis by replacing the devalued and disreputable rentenmark with a new currency, the reischmark. (146) The Dawes Plan eased reparations anxiety by bringing in American bankers to loan Germany hard currency to support the reischmark while overseeing
Termination of the Republican Government in Germany in 1933 The last years of the Weimar republic were marked by even more political instability than in the previous years. On March 29, 1930, finance expert Heinrich Bruning had been appointed the successor of Chancellor Muller by Paul von Hindenburg after months of political lobbying by General Kurt von Schleicher on behalf of the military. The new government was expected to lead a
Nervous Conditions After World War I, the German nation and its people were devastated. The public was led to believe that Germany was going to win the war, and it looked forward to a much- improved socio-economic climate. Instead, the war was lost and the country was facing a very dreary future. As a result, the government established the Weimar Republic under the leadership of Friedrich Ebert, a past leader of
Heinrich F. Albert and publicly praised by the propaganda office of the Reich Ministry of Economics, approved an enlargement of the Cologne plant as well as the construction of an assembly factory in Berlin-Johannisthal for trucks and passenger cars (Baldwin, 2001). Thereafter, in June 1938, as a direct signal of approval that Ford cars sold in Germany were finally being made entirely in Germany, the Nazi government placed an
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now