Cuban Embargo
The Failure of the Cuban Embargo
Despite a longstanding history of economic and political ties, the United States and Cuba fell into a period of adversity, largely due to the rise to power of Fidel Castro's communist government in 1958. In an effort to catalyze a regime change, the United States levied economic sanctions against Cuba in the form of a partial embargo, the scope of which was widened on January 3, 1961, after Cuba aligned itself with the Soviet Union. The embargo was imposed on Cuba in an effort to destabilize Castro's authoritarian government, which was seen as politically dangerous, given its proximity to the United States, as well as its close ties to the Soviet Union during the Cold War.
Unsurprisingly, widespread economic sanctions have failed to transition Castro's communist government toward democracy, which is a result that is consistent with similar measures enacted against other governments around the globe. As a policy tool, it seems as though financial sanctions are largely ineffective, since it essentially grants Castro the ability to blame the impotence of his own harmful government on United States foreign policy. In fact, the effects of the trade embargo are felt only at the lowest levels of Cuban society, as it deprives them of goods that could be purchased from the United States at lower costs. This result is ironic since the embargo was enacted ostensibly to free the Cuban people from an oppressive regime.
Many people view the Cuban embargo as a complete failure, as it has not accomplished its goals, and arguably has done nothing else than to bolster Castro's position and thrust the Cuban population into a deeper state of poverty. Despite this, the United States has yet to lift the embargo, due largely to strong opposition from key political leaders.
References
Griswold, Daniel. Four Decades of Failure: The U.S. Embargo against Cuba Rice University: October 12, 2005, accessed http://www.freetrade.org/node/433.
Soviet missiles were only powerful enough to be launched against Europe but U.S. missiles were capable of striking the entire Soviet Union. In late April 1962, Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev conceived the idea of placing intermediate-range missiles in Cuba. A deployment in Cuba would double the Soviet strategic arsenal and provide a real deterrent to a potential U.S. attack against the Soviet Union." (ThinkQuest Team, 1) This provides us
Cuban Embargo American-Cuban Sanctions Implications for the Future The United States has a long and complicated history with Cuba that dates back over 100 years (Ciment 1115). The United States assumed occupancy over Cuba after defeating the Spanish at the end of the 1898 Spanish-American War. Cuba became an independent country in 1902, although the United States continued to delegate power and control over Cuba's affairs through the Piatt Amendment. Supervised elections began
CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS The Cuban Missile Crisis (CMC) presented a different type of military intelligence than Pearl Harbor did. In the case of CMC, military intelligence provided tremendous amounts of valuable and incontrovertible evidence. However, that information has to be viewed in the larger context of the times to understand why the United States government viewed the situation as seriously as they did. The United States had been actively but covertly working
S., become attracted to the U.S. And flee the country. Cuba certainly needs to prevent a brain drain at all costs. It could do so by encouraging the U.S. To invest in its infrastructure and for U.S. doctors to train and learn at Cuban facilities, which, by all accounts, have some of the highest standards of excellence in the world (Schoultz, 2010, 8). By helping to build up the Cuban
Liberal Position in the U.S. Senate Why Lift U.S. Embargo on Cuba It is time for the United States to lift the embargo imposed on the island fifty years ago. The embargo is a bad policy that helps neither the United States nor Cuba, and does not achieve its goals of ousting Cuba's Communist dictators. If anything, the embargo prolongs the rule of the Castro regime since better relations between the United
Those officials who did look at the question of Japanese intentions decided that Japan would never attack, because to do so would be irrational. Yet what might seem irrational to one country may seem perfectly logical to another country that has different goals, values, and traditions. (Kessler 98) The failures apparent in the onset of World War II and during the course of the war led indirectly to the creation
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now