It also could have been much more innovative in direction and cinematography. The scenes were rich and full, and the director did use some camera angles (such as above in the church/courtroom), and above again in a scene where Abigail "sees" a spirit above her and collapses in the court. However, for the most part, this film lacked real innovation or unconventional techniques, and I think that was a weakness in the film, and part of the reason it became boring by the end. Since it was based on a stage play, most of the film is dialogue, and without some other kind of action or direction, that can stagnate in a film, and it did that here. Sadly, I think this film could have had much more impact if it had been handled differently. Abigail is not played as a sympathetic character at all, and if there was anything truly evil in this village, it seemed to be her, and the way the people blindly followed her without question. This is a powerful story about religious believes, mob behavior, and lack of questioning, but somehow, some of that message seemed lost in the background of this film, and I think that is a shame. I think Miller's work brought these themes home to the audience, but this work lost them somewhere in the beginning after it established the girls and the court drama that would follow. I believe that is because of direction, and certainly not script or acting. The direction cannot live up to the...
The film is certainly artistic, and some of the cinematography is just lovely, such as the scenes of the town with the shimmering bay in the background, and most of the outdoor scenes. However, that cannot make up for direction that lacks real drama and movement throughout the storyline.Crucible The film version of Arthur Miller's hit Broadway play of 1953 "The Crucible" was released in 1996. Miller himself wrote the screen play of the film which starred Daniel Day-Lewis and Winona Ryder in lead roles and was directed by Nicholas Hytner. The Crucible is a fictional retelling of events in American history surrounding the Salem witch trials in the year 1692. The film, as well as the play on which
QUESTION #2: Was John Proctor essentially a good man? Yes, Proctor was a good man in his heart; he made a mistake by getting involved with Abigail, but when she came back to him hoping to rekindle the flame between them, he turned down the chance for another sexual liaison with a woman much younger than his wife. When the community began to turn hysterical, Proctor was a voice of
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now