Introduction
Video games have become a major form of leisure activity played by all persons starting from teenage. While for some, they are harmless activities used as pastimes, they are considered a precursor for violent behavior for others. This has grown to be a major policy issue, especially in the US, where acts of violence, e.g., mass shootings, are a common social problem. In real-world settings, some have attached violent behavior with playing violent video games; however, it is also true that many play the same violent video games, and they still can't harm a fly.
This controversy is also evident in research findings where some argue violent video games cause violent behavior (Gentile, Bender & Anderson, 2017) while other research findings argue to the contrary (Cunningham, Engelstätter & Ward, 2016). Therefore, this paper takes a critical analysis of these two (Cunningham et al., 2016; Gentile et al., 2017) research findings that have divergent findings on the effect of violent video games on human behavior.
Analysis and comparison of the two papers
Cunningham et al. (2016) sought to determine the relationship between violent video games and violent behavior by conducting research that relied on real-world data. Using data on sales of video games considered violent and using crime as a form of violent behavior, the research tried to make the research reflective of real-world settings. The study involved comparing video game sales to report crime from official databases for the same period - 2005 to 2011.
The design and methodology adopted in this research were mainly done to avoid the settings dilemma in laboratory experiments where they do not reflect the real-world settings. From a methodological standpoint, it is obvious that this study method is limited. There was no way the researchers could control the other factors that affect criminal behavior in real-world settings. The study findings showed that an increase in video game sales didn't reflect an increase in crime; in any case, the analyzed data showed decreased reported crime.
The research by Gentile et al. (2017) similarly sought to determine the effect of playing violent video games on violent behavior. The research investigated the effects of violent video games on two physiological indicators of the fight-or-flight response (cardiovascular and cortisol changes) and the accessibility of aggressive thoughts among children.
The study utilized an explorative quantitative research design. Children participants were recruited randomly, and data was taken before and after playing a 25-minute video game that was either violent or non-violent. While this method allows for controlling some of the external factors that might affect the relationship between violent content in video games and human behavior, it completely does away with the real-world element.
Moreover, these findings are mainly short-term and might not be a true representation of what happens in the medium or long term, often when the relationship might manifest in real-world settings. The findings showed that violent video games increased cortisol and cardiovascular arousal more than other equally exciting but non-violent video games. Increased cortisol might elicit a fight-or-flight response in children, and thus, based on these findings, the researchers concluded that violent video games influence violent behavior.
Background and role of theories
The increase of violent video games...…researchers assumed that the rise in crime must have been caused by the increased sale of violent video games.
This assumption of obviously misplaced because the data doesn't indicate that the violent games played were played. Secondly, there is no indication that the perpetrators of these crimes were active players of violent video games. In the research by Gentile et al. (2017), the researchers assumed that the rise in cortisol directly results from playing violent games.
Secondly, they assumed that the rise of cortisol was a direct indication of violent behavior. From a biological perspective, while it is true that cortisol is the fight-or-flight hormone, it is obvious that participation/perpetuation of violent behavior is a conscious decision that has to be made by an individual, and not just a biological response triggered by a hormone (Matthen, 2015). Moreover, violent behavior perpetuation is an attack and cannot be categorized as either fight and not flight.
Applicability and significance
The relation between violent video games and violent behavior is significant because it allows researchers to develop scientific explanations on mainstream media's popular narrative. The proliferation of violent video games affects promoting violent behavior among teenagers and youth (American Psychological Association, 2015). The findings put forward by researchers are important as they are applied by, among others, policymakers to craft and institute policies that are favorable in governing the production and distribution of violent video games. Also, as the nature of violent video games evolves, and the types of games available become more violent and role-play, the existing findings are significant and applicable in setting knowledge and psychological foundation for operations.…
References
American Psychological Association. (2015). Resolution on Violent Video Games. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/about/policy/violent-video-games.aspx
Anderson, C. A. (2003). Violent video games: Myths, facts, and unanswered questions. Psychological Science Agenda, 16(5).
Cunningham, S., Engelstätter, B., & Ward, M. R. (2016). Violent video games and violent crime. Southern Economic Journal, 82(4), 1247-1265.
Farrelly, P. (2013). Issues of trustworthiness, validity, and reliability. British Journal of School Nursing, 8(3), 149-151.
Gentile, D. A., Bender, P. K., & Anderson, C. A. (2017). Violent video game effects on salivary cortisol, arousal, and aggressive thoughts in children. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 39–43.
Markey, P. M., Markey, C. N., & French, J. E. (2015). Violent video games and real-world violence: Rhetoric versus data. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 4(4), 277–295.
Matthen, M. (Ed.). (2015). The Oxford handbook of philosophy of perception. Oxford Handbooks.
Methodology The methodology that will be employed in this study will be a desk survey of existing studies. The data complied by the studies will be analyzed, as will be the processes and methodology used in those studies. The data compilation and yield will be discussed in comparison between studies, and an attempt will be made to take the information and use it in an overall presentation that shows that the
It would seem that on the basis of the causation rationale that age restrictions on violent video game content is no more logically justified than other types of overly broad restrictions (Olson, 2004). In the 1950s, several instances occurred where young children watching the original Superman television series fell to their deaths after trying to emulate the star character's leaping takeoff from high-rise building windows. The series was not cancelled
Video Games, Violence and Aggression The Effect of Video Games on Violence and Aggression Numerous arguments over video games primarily center on topics such as sexism, nudity, racial profiling, sex and criminal behavior as well as other provocative material. Many conflicting results have been brought out of research and study of the relation between video games and its assumed effects of violence and aggressive behavior. Here, aggression is defined as behavior intended
Video Game Violence Literature Review In January of 2012, psychologist Christian Montag and a team of German researchers sought to explore the link between habitual video game play and reduced emotional or cognitive capability, and the findings of their study were published in an article entitled Does Excessive Play of Violent First-Person-Shooter-Video-Games Dampen Brain Activity in Response to Emotional Stimuli? Montag and his colleagues expanded on the preponderance of empirical evidence
, 2000). Specifically, the fact that video games portray extremely violent actions without a human cost can lessen a person's natural response (including empathy) in addition to promoting reckless conduct in real life. It is not necessarily that teenagers consciously believe they can "do" what they see in the games the way children sometimes come to believe that they can fly. But they may absorb unconscious images that inhibit their ability
There is plenty of anecdotal evidence to support this theory -- several prominent school shootings have been ostensibly linked to video game playing -- but real scientific evidence is also emerging that suggests a more subtle but similar effect. In one study, college-age participants who had spent time playing Wolfenstein 3D, a first person shooter computer game, "punished" their opponents by subjecting them to loud noises of high intensity more
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now