But there is ample evidence, as documented in our recent report that unfettered access to registries can and does lead to extensive harassment and sometimes violence against former offenders (Fellner, 2007).
Highly publicized cases that deal with the abduction, rape, abuse, and murder of young children have led federal and state governments to introduce new laws that require stricter punishments, requirements, and prohibitions for sex offenders. Increasingly rigorous and over-inclusive necessities for sex offenders are almost unanimously accepted and easy for legislators and politicians to support because they are popular among the general public. As Congress passes law after law cracking down on sex offenders, experts and officials question whether the requirements of those acts even work to achieve the goals of legislators (Farley, 2008).
The most recent act, the Adam Walsh Act (AWA), raises many questions as Congress again expands punishments and requirements of sex offenders. The AWA contains over-inclusive sex offender registration requirements and punishment. The AWA is an unfunded order that overly burdens the state governments and places severe and unfair requirements and punishments on sex offenders. In addition, the AWA does not differentiate between violent and non-violent crimes when determining whether an offender must register as a sex offender. This ends up stigmatizing many non-violent offenders who are unlikely to recidivate but are required to register (Farley, 2008).
Children deserve laws that protect them. And former offenders need laws that allow them to rebuild their lives. The goal should be to help these people succeed in safely rejoining their...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now