Verified Document

Criminal Justice Policy Practice Determine Morality Higher Essay

¶ … Criminal Justice Policy Practice Determine Morality Higher Than Utilitarianism

The passing and reformation of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act, also known as the so-called "crack law," is one of the most controversial pieces of legislation to be considered within the criminal justice system and its policy during the past two years. There are several aspects of this legal mandate that present a plethora of interesting situations and questions in regards to the morality of this particular issue, which has been at the forefront of mass media outlets ever since there were significant amendments passed to it in 2010. Interestingly enough, a fair amount of those changes may be attributed to the notion of morality revolving around this legal code, which was largely responsible for the rapid and prolonged imprisonment of minorities -- particularly African-Americans and Latino offenders. One of the most efficacious means of determining whether such a law may be deemed moral or ethical would be to measure it against the classical theory of morality known as utilitarianism, which was propagated by a number of noted philosophers such as John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham, and David Hume. Careful examination of the legal, social, and ethical repercussions of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act may be considered within the framework of utilitarianism thought to properly gauge whether this particular piece of legislation is actually one that can rightfully be considered moral.

However, it should be noted that the dubious nature of the morality of the crack law may be questioned due to the fact that it was significantly altered in 2010 to mitigate the sentences of the numerous inmates and criminal offenders who have been regularly incarcerated due to its enactment and enforcement. A brief historical observation of the origin of this legislation traces back to its 1986 origin, a time in which crack cocaine -- which is made from heating up the powdered form of the narcotic and which solidifies through the addition of bacon soda into a sallow, yellowish looking crystal -- was highly prevalent within urban areas, and was alleged to be the cause of numerous malfeasances in society such as theft, violence, and the engendering of cocaine addicted infants. Therefore, criminal justice policy makers decided to target the rapid use and trafficking of this narcotic by implementing legislation that widely pertained to the issue of sentencing for the illicit possession of this drug. Legislators passed a law that ordained that the sentencing for crack cocaine would be disseminated at a rate that was excessively more severe than that for the powdered form of cocaine, and which translated to a ratio of 100 to 1.

For the numerous amounts of African-American and Latino citizens who may have trafficked, used, or sold the substance, the effect of the crack law would be nothing short of disastrous for their livelihoods -- and a considerable boon for the prison system. As little as five grams of crack would earn an offender a minimum of five years in prison. Meanwhile, it would take 500 grams of powdered cocaine to earn an offender that same five years in prison. Most devastating of all was the fact that an offender with two prior drug-related felony convictions would be sentenced to life in prison if he was found in possession of a minimum of 50 grams of crack. Frequently, those incarcerated for crack cocaine would be given few opportunities for substance assistance departures (Hartley et al. 382). A number of sources considered such legislation, which claimed to be prompted by the fact that crack was conducive to violence and widely prone to be more addictive than the powdered form of cocaine, largely discriminatory in nature since it imprisoned several minority offenders for considerably longer sentences than for those who were apprehended with significantly more powdered cocaine.

Yet in 2010, the Fair Sentencing Act was passed to widely reduce the disparity in the sentencing between traditional cocaine and that of crack. The ratio of the sentences was mitigated from 100 to 1 to 18 to 1, while certain aspects of the previous legislature were discontinued -- such as the mandatory life imprisonment for those convicted of a third felony in which they were is possession of more than 50 grams of crack. Just as important as this 2010 amendment to this law was the amendment made in 2011 in which the law was enacted and effected retroactively. Therefore, convicts who had been sentenced prior to the Fair Sentencing Act are now eligible to get reductions in their sentences.

There are several facets of Utilitarianism...

Parts of this document are hidden

View Full Document
svg-one

First and foremost, utilitarianism is a form of consequentialist philosophy, which posits that the moral worth of an action can largely be measured by the effects that it produces. Additionally, utilitarian thought propounds that the course of action that presents the most good is the one that is most ethical and moral in nature. Such good is frequently measured in terms of happiness, which may be stratified in certain contexts to help determine between degree, duration, and intensity of pleasure derived from an action -- all of which needs to be taken into consideration in order to properly gauge its moral value.
Therefore, utilitarianism practitioners believe that a moral practice or action can largely be determined by the amount of use (which is measured in terms of felicity) that is engendered by that practice or action. What is interesting about this notion is that prior to utilitarianism thought, there were many philosophers who largely contrasted utility with pleasure, which can be observed in the response to Epicurean thought (Mill). However, in adherence to the perspective that the greatest principle of happiness is that which can be judged the most moral, the converse of this conception maintains that actions which produce the greatest unhappiness are to be adjudged as immoral and largely unethical in scope and in perception. This aspect of utilitarianism thought will be most influential in its application to the many imprisoned for lengthy sentences (and for relatively modest amounts of possession of narcotics) via the crack law, especially in its manifestation which predated the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010.

When it comes to viewing the crack law through a lens of utilitarianism, a number of fairly salient features of this piece of legislation and its effects upon criminal offenders become readily apparent. The principle facet of this law that is highly indicative of what little good it produced can be found in the fact that the law was greatly reduced in severity in 2010. The attempts to get the austerity of the sentencing mitigated dates back several years, although in many respects it was begun in earnest in 2007 when the United States Sentencing Commission made fledgling attempts at amending it (Kosman). A number of contemporary policy makers who are directly involved in the determining of criminal justice policy (including the current United States President) were fairly vocal about the disparity in the disproportionate sentences that were routinely incurred by minority offenders for non-violent criminal activity.

In terms of utilitarianism, then, the question largely becomes whether the reduction in the sentences of such offenders, which has enabled and should continue to enable a number of offenders wrenched away from their families and what livelihoods they were trying to form for themselves, to come home. The implications of this fact, and its consequences and the good it produces, should not be underestimated. Again, it should be considered that there are numerous offenders who have received lengthy sentences for reasons such as they were simply addicted to or becoming addicted to an illegal substance that happened to be crack. Others were merely trying to earn a living while peddling the narcotic -- and not attempting to harm anyone and happened to be caught with the substance (in some instances on their first few attempts in possession of it), and were required to engage in more prison time than rapists, violent offenders, and other criminals -- simply due to the partisan nature of the crack law's sentencing regulations.

The utilitarianism perspective on this issue would seek to determine whether the greatest good would be produced by uniting such people with their families (who may have incurred their own share of punishment and suffering at having lost a financial and emotional provider) and by allowing them to pursue life-altering changes that created good with their lives and the lives of those around them, or by allowing them to sit in jail, earning mere pennies for an hour's worth of labor, while their families and loved ones suffered in neglect. The answer appears fairly obvious, and seems to imply that the greatest good is produced by allowing such people to make some sort of useful existence for themselves out of the…

Sources used in this document:
Works Cited

Bentham, Jeremy. "Offenses Against One's Self: Paederasty Part 1." Journal of Homosexuality. Volume 3 (4). 389-406. 1978. Print.

Benthan, Jeremy. An Introduction To The Principles Of Morals And Legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Kosman, Maxwell Alie Halpern. "Falling Through The Crack: How Courts Have Struggled to Apply The Crack Amendment To "Nominal Career" And "Plea Bargain" Defendants." Michigan Law Review. Volume 109. 785-812. 2011. Web. http://www.michiganlawreview.org/assets/pdfs/109/5/kosman.pdf

Hartley, Richard., Maddan, Sean., Spahn, Cassia. "Prosecutorial Discretion: An Examination of Substantial Assistance Departures in Federal Crack-Cocaine and Powder-Cocaine Cases." Volume 23. Issue 3 382-407. 2007. Web. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07418820701485379
Mill, John Stuart. Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism.com No date. Web. http://www.utilitarianism.com/index.htm
Mustard, David. "Racial, Ethnic and Gender Disparities in Sentencing: Evidence From the U.S. Federal Courts." The Journal of Law and Economics. Volume 14. 285-314. 2001.Web. Retrieved from http://time.dufe.edu.cn/jingjiwencong/waiwenziliao1/004109.web.pdf
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Crack Cocaine As One of
Words: 1127 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

In some ways, the prevalence of crime related to selling and using crack cocaine may be due to the effects which the user experiences. For instance, heavy users become alienated from their friends and families and tend to be isolated and suspicious of everything and everyone, a form of drug-induced paranoia. Most of their time is spent thinking about ways to obtain more and more of the drug which may

Crack Cocaine Vs. Powder Cocaine
Words: 896 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Henderson notes that "minimal violence is involved with crack cocaine cases -- far less than half of the crack cocaine cases involved a weapon, while most actual violence is associated with the drug trade and not the drug itself." With this knowledge that there is no scientific difference in the dangerousness of the two drugs and that violence is not necessarily associated more with crack cocaine, it becomes clear

Crack Cocaine and Its Impact on Miami Gardens
Words: 715 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Drug Related Issues in Miami Gardens Miami Gardens is a location where there are large numbers of minorities and immigrants. This is the location just north of Miami and it composes of a number of different neighborhoods. The most notable include: Andover, Bunche Park, Carol City, Lake Lucerne, Norwood, Opa Locka North and Scott Lake. In general, the community is facing drug related challenges from its close proximity to Central and

Sentencing Disparities Between Crack Cocaine
Words: 8900 Length: 32 Document Type: Term Paper

The judge must choose a sentence from within the guideline range unless the court identifies an aggravating or mitigating circumstance that was not adequately considered by the Sentencing Commission. In mandatory minimum drug cases, judges can depart only upon motion from the government stating that a defendant has provided substantial assistance in the investigation or prosecution of another person. All guideline drug sentences are indirectly affected by the mandatory minimums.

Crack Capturing the Audience's Attention
Words: 673 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

A. Supporting details (Give citation) Crack is a powerful central nervous system stimulant that can increase risk for cardiovascular incidents, strokes, and other deadly effects (National Institute on Drug Abuse 2009). B. Supporting details (Give citation) Addicts may even use crack cocaine while pregnant, severely harming their children. "Fetal cocaine effects include premature separation of the placenta, spontaneous abortion, premature labor, low birthweight and head circumference at birth, greater chance of visual impairment,

Cocaine and Crack: Proletariat Hunger
Words: 1433 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

There is no valuable sustenance in crack or cocaine, and is used mainly as a recreational drug by many. This, in some ways, leaves the inner cities and crime and moves to the wealthier middle and upper middle classes who use the cocaine and not the crack version for recreation. This is the society of Jay McInerney's seminal 1980s fictional tale of New York 20-something lives, "Bright Lights, Big

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now