This fuel included the Federal Aviation Regulation requirement for fuel to destination plus 45 min and the company contingency fuel of about 20 min. During a post accident interview, the captain stated that he was very close to his predicted fuel for the entire flight to Portland."..or there would have been some discussion of it." The captain also explained that his flight from Denver to Portland was normal." (the Editors of AVweb, 1999) the captain was obviously responsible for this event because just like any captain at sea, he is, or at least should have been, the man
There was some thought after the fact that maybe fuel gauges were broken. But that has been disputed. "I, too, was surprised to read in the Oregonian article on the 20-year reunion of the crash of UA173 that faulty fuel gauges were attributed to the crash. That is the first time I had heard about that. I was one of the Portland International FAA Air Traffic Controllers on duty that fateful evening." (KingRey, 1999) According to one of the controllers on the scene, at some point the UA173 crew announced they had gear problems and the controller offered the flight's captain the option of holding or landing. "Captain McBroom declined and canceled IFR. He elected to proceed southeast of the airport 20 miles or so, and circled for a period of time." (KingRey, 1999)
Who else was supposed to help and did the first officer or flight engineer fail to maintain vigilance in regard to the fuel situation and thus missed the opportunity to recommend a quick landing? It looks as though that is exactly what happened. Apparently everyone on board and on the ground was properly...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now