U.S. Policy and the War on Terror: An Ineffective Strategy
Since 9/11 the U.S. government has pursued a policy of combating terrorism with all of its resources (intelligence, technology, military, economic sanctions, etc.). However, the question remains, nearly a decade and a half later, with terror attacks occurring more and more frequently around the world, whether the U.S. has been effective in its countering of terrorism. According to various studies, it can be shown how far from actually eradicating terrorism, the policies of the U.S. government have actually helped to foster the spread of terrorism. Now, as Russia steps into the Middle East to fight ISIS at the request of Syria, a disinformation campaign in the West has been put into practice by the mainstream media to show how Russia and Syria are hurting the war against terrorism, when the reality is that Russia has been far more effective in hurting ISIS and affiliated terrorists in mere months than the U.S. has been over the course of years. This paper will show how and why the U.S. government policy since 9/11 has not been very effective in countering terrorism.
To understand the U.S. government's policy and how and why it has been ineffective so far in the fight against terrorism, it is necessary to understand the history of the actors involved. The policy writers within the U.S. government have had their own motivations for waging an ineffectual war on terrorism (or for waging an unending war, which is good for the business of the military-industrial complex as well as for the destabilization of Middle Eastern regimes that oppose Western corporate interests, such as the laying of oil and gas pipelines).[footnoteRef:1] In other words, "terrorism" provides a pretext for the policy writers even as that terrorism actually exists and is fostered by aspects of the policy (such as random bombings of Middle Eastern hospitals and weddings, drone strikes, disappearances, the arrest of diplomats, etc.).[footnoteRef:2] That ISIS has grown out of al-Qaeda, which grew out of the mujahedeen, which was supported by the U.S. to fight the Soviets is a mere matter of record.[footnoteRef:3] Understanding how it has been the policy of the U.S. to use the war on terror as an excuse to expand its own hegemonic interests in the Middle East is needed to see why the policy of "countering terrorism" has been so ineffective: it was never intended to be effective -- not in the way that the public has been lead to believe. [1: Pepe Escobar, "Syria: Ultimate Pipelineistan War." Information Clearing House, 9 Dec 2015. Web. 12 Dec 2015.] [2: Tyler Durden, "U.S. Bombs Afghanistan Hospital, Kills At Least 9 Doctors and 3 Children, Calls it 'Collateral Damage'." Zero Hedge, 3 Dec 2015. Web. 12 Dec 2015.] [3: William Engdahl, "What Stinks in Saudi Ain't the Camel Dung." Information Clearing House, 11 Dec 2015. Web. 12 Dec 2015.]
As Kayhan Barzegar notes, the "concept of terrorism" has been manipulated and used by policy writers to serve as a cover motive for real geopolitical aims.[footnoteRef:4] The War on Terrorism was given full-fledged support and encouragement on 20 September 2001 by leading members of The Project for the New American Century (PNAC), William Kristol and Richard Perle among many others of the so-called "neo-conservative" alliance, when they signed a letter to G. W. Bush which called for a "war on international terrorism."[footnoteRef:5] Pat Buchanan, one of the few political voices to warn against such an aim, criticized PNAC as a "cabal of intellectuals" out to revolutionize America.[footnoteRef:6] Kristol would later set his sights on eliminating oppositional voices, such as Buchanan and Ron Paul, admitting in 2012 at B'nai Jeshurun synagogue that he had been "encouraged" when Buchanan had been marginalized in the Presidential Elections and would be "happy" if Ron Paul were to "go." "[footnoteRef:7] So while on the face of it, the War on Terrorism is a necessary battle against al-Qaeda and affiliates (ISIS, etc.); underneath, it is a political ruse -- a gambit formulated by a highly-motivated group of Washington insiders and foisted on the American people through the strong arm of mainstream media. This paper will describe what the War on Terrorism is and what it is not. [4: Kayhan Barzegar, "The Terror Plot, An Ideological War for Geopolitical Interests," Iran Review, 24 Oct 2011. Web. 12 Dec 2015. ] [5: John Davis. Presidential Policies and the Road to the Second Iraq War. (VT: Ashgate, 2006), 51. ] [6: Ibid, 52.] [7: Pat Buchanan, "How Bill Kristol Purged the Arabists." Anti-War.com,...
Table of Contents I. Opening II. Titles III. Related Topics IV. Outline V. Introduction VI. Essay Hook VII. Thesis Statement VIII. Body A. Background B. Jihad C. Sunni/Shia Split D. Relationship between AL Qaeda and Isis E. ISIS attacks on the United States IX. Conclusion X. Works Cited XI. Closing Opening In this essay about ISIS attacks in America, we examine attacks by the terrorist organization ISIS, which have occurred on U.S. soil. Because of the structure of ISIS/ISIL, which operate in cells, it can be extremely difficult
Terrorism: ISIS Imminent Threat to America The ISIS ("Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham") is an Islamic State of Iraq, simply known as Islamic state. Since 2010, the Islamic group has seized Mosul and is controlling a territory larger than the United Kingdom. The Islamic state is an extremist's militant group proclaimed calipahate led by the Sunni Arabs in Iraq. By March 2015, the ISIS has occupied a territory of more
ISISThe Islamic State in Iraq & Syria (ISIS) is a Sunni jihadist group that emerged from the other Sunni insurgency groups that were operating in Iraq after the US invasion in 2003. The leader of ISIS, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, was a member of one of these groups, which was funded by al-Qaeda. After the group was kicked out of al-Qaeda, they decided to form their own group and slowly began
Friedman arguing in this piece? Friedman discusses the Putin decision to set up an air base in Syria's center to fight against the Islamic State, bolstering President Bashar al-Assad and how it completely backfired costing the lives of hundreds of Russians. While force may be what people outside of ISIS controlled areas desire in order to defeat ISIS, using force does more harm than good. This is because the violence
ISIS Destroying Syria and Syrians Suffering at Their Hands The Islamic State of Syria (ISIS) is a militia group that has its roots in Iraq and later on expanded its reach out to Syria and is now active much further in different expanses of the Middle East too. The ongoing war between the two Muslim communities, Sunnis and Shiites has largely destroyed the nation of Syria with Syrians being the most
Abu Bakr al-BaghdadiIntroductionAbu Bakr al-Baghdadi, born as Ibrahim Awwad Ibrahim Ali Muhammad al-Badri al-Samarrai, was the leader of the extremist group, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), also known as Daesh, from 2010 until his death in 2019. His leadership over this terrorist group led to the declaration of a caliphate in 2014, which lasted until 2017 when the caliphate\\\'s territory had been mostly recaptured.Background and TrainingAl-Baghdadi was
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now