The dark side of solidarity-based cultures is that they can become overly impersonal, neglecting the needs of the individual in favor of the collective.
A culture with high levels of sociability and high levels of solidarity becomes Communal. A culture with low levels of both sociability and solidarity is described as Fragmented. Organizational cultures with High levels of sociability but low levels of solidarity is Networked, and an organization with high levels of solidarity but low levels of sociability is Mercenary. In The Character of a Corporation, the authors offer readers a checklist and questionnaire to help them determine the nature of their organization's culture. Issues including the organization's physical space and work environment; communications infrastructure and style; concept of time and scheduling; and level of personal identities all contribute to the determination of an organization's culture.
The authors' four main points regarding the Double S. Cube include the following. First, organizations can be comprised of more than one culture, especially large organizations with multiple divisions. Second, organizations often demonstrate an evolutionary life-cycle, shifting from culture to culture in a predictable order. Third, none of the organizational cultures described in the book are superior or inferior independently of the specific business environment or of the organization's immediate goals. Fourth, the Double S. Cube graphically illustrates the dark side of each culture: its dysfunctional counterpart.
A large portion of The Character of a Corporation is dedicated to explaining in detail the nature of each culture: Networked, Communal, Fragmented, and Mercenary. Goffee and Jones discuss the positive and negative consequences of the culture in terms of the organizational goals and also point out how individual
The Character of a Corporation reads like a self-help book for organizations. From the accessible diction, first and second-person point-of-view, and inclusion of quizzes and questionnaires, the authors are reaching out toward a mainstream audience. The theoretical underpinnings of the book are academically sound, so in spite of its casual tone, the book remains a credible source of information to organizational consultants, business leaders, or anyone interested in the implications of organizational culture.
Goffee and Jones' book is best suited for individuals who have the power to change their company's culture. Executives and other business leaders would benefit from understanding how culture can affect the bottom line or increase the company's attractiveness to shareholders. The Character of a Corporation is also tailored for the cultures of large organizations, although the basic concepts of the book can be easily applied toward smaller ones. Goffee and Jones' work is broad in scope but can inspire readers to investigate organizational culture in more detail. The Character of a Corporation therefore makes a valuable adjunct to any business or sociology library.
Works Cited
Goffee, Rob and Jones, Gareth. The Character of a Corporation: How Your Company's Culture and Make or Break Your Business. New York: Harper, 1998.
Ethics-Based Culture The author of this report has been asked to define and encapsulate the things that must be done, the actions that must be taken and the people that must be in place for there to be an ethics-based culture at a place of business. As the prior sentence implies, it takes more than one thing for a business to become, remain and stand tall as an ethics-based business. It
UNIFYING COMPANY CULTURE Unifying Company Culture: The Acquisition of Coca-Cola and Sunrise Beverages Corp.OverviewFrom the onset, it would be prudent to note that Coca-Cola happens to be a global beverages enterprise headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia. At present, the company is deemed one of the world�s largest beverage enterprises. Some of its key competitors are inclusive of, but they are not limited to, PepsiCo and Anheuser-Busch InBev. On the other hand,
The exponential growth of the Internet has also served as the catalyst for the growth of highly collaborative, interactive forums and platforms on which Delphi-like brainstorming can be accomplished (Decker, Wagner, Scholz, 2005). Conversely many of the external relationships companies have and that are essential to understanding how the strategic planning process will impact an organization lend themselves to quantification. An example of this level of quantification of external
Culture Analysis Paper Company Overview I’m studying a software company that shall be known as K. K is not based in Silicon Valley, but elsewhere in the US, with offices around the world. K sells SaaS products in the B2B market and has sales in the hundreds of millions, and over 1000 employees. This company has also acquired several small firms in recent years. Integrating all of those individual cultures into a
Short-term wins creation In this case, the insistence is on the enhancement of credibility for change through demonstrating gains made. In the case of News Corp, those who excel in change related initiatives could be rewarded and recognized going forward. Building on Change/Consolidation of Gains Here, quick wins should be taken as a beginning and not as an end. Hence in a way, victory must not be declared before the whole change process
Culture pervasiveness and the difficulty of defining it is one of the reasons why it is attributed for many merger failures. The problem considered in this study was the unstable operating environment that existed following the acquisition of INTEC Engineering by Worley Parsons which was likely caused by differences in organizational cultures. WorleyParsons acquired SEA Engineering in 2007 and INTEC Engineering April 2008 and combined these organizations to form INTECSEA.
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now