Organized Crime Control
Controlling Organized Crime
The purpose of this paper is to research "Organized Crime" historically and what effects it has on society in the present time as well as implications for the future and then to examine what suggestions have been offered for asserting effective control over that which is termed "organized crime."
Organized crime can be defined as structured business framework that with no regard to moral, ethic or societal concerns or standards prospers from that which promises to prosper the individual and group within that network the most. Some examples of organized crime are the drug trafficking trade, illegal weapons and nuclear arms trade, slave trade, gambling rings, pornography rings among many other variations of the major crime categories.
Many of the Organized Crime networks are based on familial relations although there are networks defined by religion, government, country, political persuasion among other groups which characteristic of some sort remains in common among the group that is within itself a separate culture.
I. Understanding Organized Crime:
A study performed by John Hagan relates that much research has been applied to attainment of success demonstrated by all the trappings of home, car and prestige. However, he declares, the analysis of illegal crime and the profits realized in that "black-market" business have not been thoroughly research to a great extent. Hagan states that:
"Indeed the notion of illegal prosperity challenges common held beliefs that success requires participation in conventional activities. Perhaps even more unsettling is the possibility that theories of legal prosperity also explain illegal success." Hagan (2001) Hagan also states that during the 1980's and the early 1990's that it appears as though:
"The economic restructuring . . . undoubtedly encouraged some entrepreneurial youth to take up drug dealing." (Hagan 2001)
North America suffered great decreases in employment specifically in inner-city areas as well as a lowering of wages of a sum up to 30% "which affected mostly young, under-educated, racial minorities." Hagan (2004) Reports demonstrate the transformation that occurred in the inner-city environment that crumbled the societal structure and has resulted in the ongoing increase in crime. Criminologists, Baron & Hartnagel 1997, Fagin, 1992 believe that the crime increase can be attributed to those in the inner-city crumbling economic structure in desperation turned to alternate means of generating income in order to survive. (Hagan 2001).
II. Organized Crime -- Smuggling & Drugs
A report published by the Washington Times in August 2001 and written by Karen DeYoung, which is entitled "Alarm on Spreading Ecstasy; Illegal Pills Fly in from Europe, Eluding Standard Remedies for Smuggling states that:
"Two years ago the amount of the illegal drug Ecstasy entering the United States was worrisome, but not a major concern for federal law enforcement . . .Today, Ecstasy is the fastest-growing abused drug in the United States." DeYoung (2001)
A group that is called "Israeli Organized Crime" by the DEA is reportedly bringing the drug into the U.S. The ISC is a group of "chieftains ... well traveled in their twenties, speak multiple languages and carry more than one passport according to the Washington Times report. Unfortunately, the report stated that "Israel's laws do not permit extradition of its citizens." DeYoung (2001).
According to a report entitled "America's Habit: Drug Trafficking & Organized Crime: Chapter VI Part 2: Interdiction written by Irving R. Kaufman:
"Our National Strategy consists of five "major elements," each of which in turn is comprised of numerous programs and strategies. Interdiction, just one of these sub-components, presently consumes one-third of the entire Federal drug abuse outlay for the fiscal year. Measured just in terms of outlays designated for law enforcement activities, interdiction's portion swells to almost one-half of the Federal funds being spent to combat drug abuse. By Commission calculation,...
Law and Society The Nature of Law and Justice - Sadomasochism Sadomasochism presents the complexities and nuances involved in the nature of law and justice. In its purest definition, socially and legally, sadomasochism is a consensual act. There may even be actual contracts involved. However, this presentation shows that just because there is consent to the act, doesn't mean that the dominant can get away with anything. In cases in which the
Oliver Wendell Holmes states that justice is subjective and changes according to the viewer's prejudice, viewpoint or social affiliation. But a set of rules is needed to make society function and these rules must be carried out. This philosophy of law applies to Ann Hopkins' case. The senior partner and admissions committee had the prerogative of setting out the rules with which partners should be selected. Their sense of justice
I just like accumulating knowledge and my professional career has shown that you never can really know where you will be needing parts of that knowledge: I worked as a machinist for some time, but then I was able to promote because of the additional knowledge I had gained in the meantime. I hope that the education I will receive in law school would help improve my knowledge portfolio to
Law and Philosophy Holmes' "bad man" theory offers insight into the difference between the law and morality. The bad man is not concerned with morality but he is as concerned about the law as any "good" man because in knowing the law, he can avoid getting into trouble. The bad man would lie, cheat, and/or steal if it weren't against the law because he cares not for the morals that underlie
However, Erin Brockovich the movie has a very different ending than the actual civil action under tort law brought against California's Pacific Gas and Electric Co. The Hollywood ending would have been preferable, however life is just not that simple and a tort law case against such a company is really a long, tiring legal battle. The 1993 legal dispute from Hinkley was resolved by arbitrage and at first
The fact that a guard was able to take information from a prisoner's cell, and give it to prosecutors is a clear violation of basic procedures. As a result, greater amounts of oversight are required to prevent these issues from becoming a problem in the future. ("Deon Christopher Carter v State of Maryland," 2003) Conclusion Clearly, the evidence that was collected from Jones' cell is a violation of the Sixth Amendment.
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now