After that great war, the black soldiers of the very nation that liberated Europe and Asia from murderous dictatorships returned home to social rules that prohibited their sharing water fountains and food services next to the white majority (Nevins & Commager).
Civil Rights as a Fundamental Social Value:
Before respectfully issuing my recommendations to the Elders as requested, I would like to outline the most important principles that I believe the history of human societies on earth have made clear in the realm of social rules as pertains to diverse populations. First, the true measure of human society is not how well its most privileged and powerful members live; rather, the true measure of any society is the homogeneity with which all members of society are incorporated into it and the minimization of differences between opportunities available to all persons. Second, government authorities have a legitimate justification and motive for regulating conduct and behavior that directly affects other human beings. Conversely, government authorities have no justification for regulating purely personal matters such as religious choice, sexual preference, or lifestyle, provided only that none of those choices affect others adversely.
Third, if human societies are to benefit from the last millennia of recorded history, and in particular, the unfortunate record of unnecessary human atrocity, they must recognize and establish an affirmative duty to preserve the rights and privileges of all members of society equally.
Respectful Recommendations for the Island of Tagg:
In light of the foregoing, I would first like to express my gratitude for having been solicited by the Elders to assist with perhaps the most important decision in the future history of the Island of Tagg. I am humbled by the opportunity. It is hereby recommended that the Elders draft an constitutional document that outlines the most important elements of moral principles, ethical rules, and formal guidelines to guide future generations in the same manner that modern America is served by its...
However, where a state statute exerts control over matters capable of being regulated by Congress under the Commerce Clause, those statutes are invalid because they conflict with a concept that is generally referred to as the "dormant Commerce Clause" (Dershowitz, 2002; Friedman, 2005). In modern application, federal courts apply a three-pronged test to determine whether or not a given state statute is invalid by virtue of a conflict with Congressional
Constitutional Law Debate: The Legislative Branch The Legislative Branch of government is the most powerful for many reasons. Of course, there would be people who would argue against that and state that other branches are more powerful because of specific powers that those branches possess. Despite that argument, the Legislative Branch of the U.S. Government clearly has more power because of the types of decisions that have been entrusted to them.
Kennedy referred to international as well as domestic standards in defense of the court's majority opinion. He wrote: "Our determination that the death penalty is disproportionate punishment for offenders under eighteen finds confirmation in the stark reality that the United States is the only country in the world that continues to give official sanction to the juvenile death penalty. This reality does not become controlling, for the task of
Constitutional Legitimacy: Reflecting on the Place of the US Constitution According to Chau (2012), the concept of constitutional legitimacy refers to “the acceptance that an exercise in power is justified and therefore authorized, either implicitly or explicitly, by society at large” by a constitution (par.1). This is different from the concept of legality. Rather, constitutional legitimacy refers to how the legitimacy of laws are derived. In stark contrast to many European
Northern states hoped that slavery would eventually prove unprofitable and wanted the Constitution to ban the (external) slave trade. This would not have banned slavery outright, merely banned the import of new slaves. The Constitution gave congress the power to ban the slave trade only 1808, presumably to give the southern economy time to 'adjust' or to determine how necessary the trade was to the economy in the future. Also,
Business Law The 1988 and later 1992 Supreme Court decision in Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. illustrates the functions and role of law in business and public health. This case relates to the tobacco industry's culpability in promoting smoking through marketing campaigns after knowledge of the detrimental effects of smoking, and in spite of the mandatory Surgeon General Warning labels that had been federally mandated since the 1960s and the Federal
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now