In other words, these employees are considered units that provide certain levels of profits, at certain quality standards, while requiring certain levels of resources.
In other words, it is important that employees focus on providing high levels of profits, while not reducing the quality standards, and reducing the level of resources that are required in order to provide these profits. In such cases, companies establish the level of profits that is considered satisfactory, and the level of resources that the company can invest in reaching these objectives.
However, there are situations where these activities require higher levels of resources in comparison with those established by the company. Therefore, the employees that are affected by such situations, can reduce the quality of their activity in order to stay within the resources levels established by the company, or use larger resources in order to reach the established quality standards (Frost, 2010). It is difficult to determine which alternative should be addressed. This differs in each situation.
The increased competitiveness between companies' employees usually determines improved performance of these employees (Cummings, 1994). But this is not a successful solution on longer periods of time. This is because employees should collaborate with each other, and not compete. By competing within the company, employees become adversaries, they stand on opposite positions, instead of being on the same side. They do not focus on improving their situation, but on creating problems that reveal other employees' flaws. This is not a productive situation for these companies.
In addition to this, communication within competitive workplace environments is defective. This is because employees that work in such competitive companies consider that they should not communicate useful information that can help their colleagues do their job. They prefer to not communicate certain information, because it would create problems for their colleagues, while making them look good. This is not a useful situation for these companies.
But workplace environments with reduced competitiveness between employees do not determine them to improve their performance. In such companies, employees are not interested in developing their career, their skills, and their performance, because there is no threat, and they do not feel the need of getting out of their comfort zone and increasing their work efforts.
Conclusions
Business Processes The administration and the information system at Google rely heavily on the use of business process management. Business process management proves an effective tool in the organization owing to the variation of the knowledge, skills, and expertise of the employees. Significant evidence reveals that process management improves the performance of the company by enhancing its management of operations, customer satisfaction, reduction in costs of operating organizational activities, and ensuring
Business Organization Theory: Sony This is a paper that analyzes an article from the business organization theory perspective. It has 2 sources. Organizations in the international business setting nowadays face tremendous competition as they are not only competing with local competitors but also with those abroad as well (Hill 1999). This had been the case with Sony whose arch rival Samsung and LG Electronics of South Korea have in the recent years
2003, pg. 3191). While the human analysis component of this definition is important, very little research has looked at it in any level of detail. Combining the various BI definitions we will use the following definition for BI in this research: Business Intelligence consists of the use of analytical technologies and data stores by people in an organization to analyze business problems and produce related business recommendations to improve
Business Plan for a Financial Divorce Software Business Plan Divorce Software Business Plan relating to the Sales of a new Financial Divorce Software. Business Plan relating to the Sales of a new Financial Divorce Software F F1 F2 F3 G1 G1(a) G1(b) G1(c) Business Identification Keys to Success Company Summary Industry History Legal Form of Ownership Location and Facilities Management Structure Products and Service Market Analysis Target Market Industry Analysis Competitive Analysis Market Strategy Ps of Marketing Price List Selling Strategy Sales Forecast Implementation Strategy Overall Strategy Implementation Control Plan Financial Statements and Projections Revenue and Cost Estimate Forecasted Profit and Loss Statement Forecasted Balance Sheet Financial
We can use this opportunity to establish loyalty among our existing customers, develop referrals among our customers to their colleagues, and establish our brand and credibility as local suppliers of organic fertilizer of high quality and at a good price to our market. With this in place, it will be difficult for any new market entrants to displace us in our local area as the main suppliers of organic
Business Level Corporate Level Strategies Business-Level Corporate-Level Strategies Analyze the business-level strategies Analyze the corporate-level strategies Analyze the competitive environment Difference in slow-cycle and fast-cycle markets The corporate strategy of a business is based on the vision and mission of the entity. It also lays a foundation stone for business and functional strategies. The industry sector specific to the business is also influential factor in developing strategies for a specific corporation. Diversification in related and unrelated
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now