Company audit occurs when there is need to examine the performance of a big company especially the financial and the accounting records over a given period of time. Professionals such as the certified public accountant always do the auditing. The audit of a company is significant in the verification of accuracy particularly in the accounting records. A company like coca cola will need an audit to help in verifying their financial records because of the large market they are serving. Coca Cola Company is undeniably the world's largest distributor when it comes to beverages, majorly used as refreshment by the consumers. The company enjoys a larger number of distribution countries and in the number of consumers using their products. This paper gives the audit about the coca cola company. In auditing the company, there is need to study some of the agreement that the company had engaged itself in.
The contract between the coca cola company and Dr. Pepper Snapple Group
This agreement was made in the year 2010 involving the company and the Dr. Pepper Snapple Group in which the former was to pay for the distribution of some of the latter's brands. The agreement was that the coca cola company was to pay $715 million in order to take over distribution of the brands (Press Kits 2010). This is just after the company had completed the establishment of The Coca Cola Company planned acquisition of coca cola enterprises (CCE) in the North American Business; consequently, the contract was a continuation of the distribution that was started by the CCE. The distribution was aimed at complementing the action of the CCE. This agreement also involved the latter joining the innovative Coca Cola Freestyle Fountain Dispenser (Press Kits 2010). The coca cola company entered the agreement to complement on the efforts to achieve the 2020 vision of increasing the system revenue twice the present value. This would have made the company to be one of the most powerful distribution company since it would have established a strong distribution network in the world.
The terms involved in the agreement
The coca cola company had to acquire a definite agreement with the CCE in order to continue distributing the DPS's brands. This is as the result of the CCE being the initial distributor of the brands. The definite agreement would have enabled the company to take over the North American bottling business that was at the time being controlled by the CCE. The CCE would in turn acquire the company's Norway and Sweden operation, which were under the control of the latter (Press Kits 2010). The agreement between the company and the CCE could have also affected the budgeting of the company.
The coca cola company was to pay the $715 million at once in order to take over the distribution of the DPS brands. The distribution was especially aimed in the states of America and in some of the territories in Canada. These regions were prior distribution countries for CCE. The distributed brands under the license agreement were Canada Dry, C'Plus and Schweppes in Canada (Press Kits 2010). Under the agreement, the license was to last for 20 years for the initial term (Press Kits 2010). The agreement would also be renewed for 20 years being one of the most renewal periods of a contract in the world. It is also worth noting that the agreement would act as a substitute of the initially existing agreement, which was made between the CCE and DPS in North American bottling business (Press Kits 2010). This would have affected either negatively or positively on the financial position of the company because they had to spend on the agreement.
Apart from the money offered to the DPS, the company was also to offer the latter a place in the fountain accounts of the local regions, which were under the CCE. This agreement also required the company to include the Dr. Pepper and Diet Dr. Pepper in their own Freestyle referred to as the coca cola Freestyle fountain dispenser. The FreestyleTM has a term of 20-year s from the period when the agreement came into existence. The investment of the DPS's in the license agreement is estimated to be at $115 to $135 million (Press Kits 2010). This meant a profit to the partners of the agreement.
Aftermath of the agreement
On the verge of the agreement, Coca Cola Company would have established their roots in the Dr. Pepper trademark bottlers in the states of America (Press Kits 2010). The rate distribution activity of the company will also have increased since there would be uninterrupted distribution of the brands to the current customers who had a direct relation to the CCE. Consequently, the customer the CCF owning the outlets will be having a greater choice of distributing the available brands. This will essentially increase the number...
In other words, if the financial difficulties they encounter are the fault of the auditing firm, they will have protection from any legal ramifications they may have encountered from faulty accounting or auditing measures. Preventive measures are also part of the internal controls of the auditing firm itself, so that each person who works with that firm knows the measures that are to be taken to make sure auditing
Audit Quality and Agency Cost Since the advent of industrialization, there has been the presence of a bond between the people who invest and the people who manage those investments, forming a vital relationship amongst the two groups. Although with the rise of such relationships, the soaring issues of trust and confidence have been a hindrance in economic growth. Viewing the high percentage of the capital of investors or shareholders in
The most notable include: The inability to account for risks from customers with poor credit. The way sales are recorded with the income booked once the transaction is closed (versus when the income is received). Preparing for sudden shifts in the economy or from competitors. Substantive Tests The substantive test is when we are determining if the current strategy will be effective in addressing the risks facing the firm. This is accomplished through examining
Audit planning is the first step in establishing the basis of the nature, timing, and extent of the overall audit strategy to determine the validity of the financial statements. An efficient and effective audit plan provides for a thoroughly and properly planned audit (The Importance of Audit Planning). It helps to reduce audit risk to a low level. Audit planning ensures appropriate attention to critical areas and that potential problems
The implementation of this standard will give auditors much more control over the audit process. This gives the auditors the tools they need to meet their responsibilities with respect to professional skepticism. Auditors are responsible for the quality of the financial statements, and this standard gives them the mandate to be sufficiently creative in the audit design so as to detect misstatement. The change benefits experienced auditors in particular, and
As they can use this mechanism to: protect themselves and not directly reveal this information to the general public. ("Mortgage Mess, n.d.) A good example of this can be seen with New Century Financial during: the 2004 and 2005 audits. In this situation, KPMG discovered seven different internal controls that were considered to be: a material breach in the law. However, they did not disclose this information to investors. Instead,
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now