Introduction
Major wars have almost always resulted in nations and enemies trying to come up with new strategies and weapons to perform even better next time. This phenomenon has made it interesting to try and predict how future wars will be fought. Many military and conflict scholars have written theories that have attempted to predict how future wars will be fought. Perhaps the most renowned among them is Carl von Clausewitz. Carl wrote a theory that has for quite some time now been used to predict how the elements of war interact in conflicts[footnoteRef:1]. Carl also wrote a theory that attempted to explain how various elements of war are frequently changing. In the theory, Carl focused more on the changing the social elements of war and downplayed the technological ones. In this paper, my argument is that the technological advances and innovations in the airpower, cyberspace, and space industries will alter the future of war and lead to social changes, political changes, new war concepts, new war doctrines, and new rules in the utilization of airpower. [1: Mark Clodfelter, "Back from the future: The impact of change on airpower in the decades ahead." Strategic Studies Quarterly 3, no. 3 (2009): 105-6.]
The nature of war is its essence. It is what differentiates it from other human activities or undertakings. The true nature of war is that it is usually political, interactive, and violent. If an activity or undertaking is not political, interactive, and violent, then it cannot be classed as war. It is some other activity[footnoteRef:2]. The character of war is its physical and cognitive manifestation[footnoteRef:3]. War manifests itself in both the physical and the cognitive domains. According to Carl von Clausewitz, the character of war is shaped by the groups or nations in war and their political goals and objectives[footnoteRef:4]. While the conduct of war is determined by military organization, type of government, societal norms, morality, culture, ethics, laws, technology, and several other factors which change and evolve with time. [2: JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF-JCS. "Joint Operating Environment JOE 2035: The Joint Force in a Contested and Disordered World. US Joint Chiefs of Staff, J7, Joint Force Development [cit. 2016-07-01]." (2016).] [3: JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF-JCS. Joint Operating Environment, 1-5] [4: Clodfelter, Back from the future, 105]
The role of airpower in historic wars
Historically, airpower was initially used in a major war during the First World War. Militaries used planes particularly for surveillance and observation activities during the First World War and this helped them to quickly deal with potential threats and negate enemy activities. This made it difficult for militaries to conduct flanking maneuvers leading to...…112]
When looking at how air power will be applied in the future, two important areas must be considered. First, for the USAF to carry out its core missions effectively, it must continue to improve its capabilities. Only a completely capable USAF will be able to carry out all its core missions. Second, for the USAF to continue playing a key role in the defense of the United States, it also needs to improve its more nuanced airpower capabilities[footnoteRef:8]. This is especially important because such capabilities are needed in non-conventional wars such as those being fought in areas like Afghanistan. [8: Grissom, The future of military innovation studies, 905-934]
Conclusion
As it is evident above, airpower has already changed and will further change the future of war. The core missions of the USAF include air control, ISR, air mobility, and strike. These missions and the critical systems that enable them are continuing to be enhanced through the use of technology and cyberspace. The changes are impacting the tactical and operational use of airpower. They are also changing how wars are being fought and how they will be fought in the future. For instance, new technologies in aircraft manufacture have enabled the manufacture of faster and more stealth aircraft that have changed and will continue to change the character of war.…
Air, Space, And Cyber Space Security Air, Space, and Cyberspace Power Studies "Since the birth of military aviation, airmen have claimed that airpower offered a new approach to warfare. Even in the earliest days of aviation, airpower's range of action, its ability to react and refocus quick across a wide area without having to consider the terrain or access, and its inherent above -- the surface perspective all pointed to a new
Developments in Air Doctrine from 1903 to the End of World War IIAir doctrine is essentially an innovation of the 20th Century whose origin can be traced back to 1903 when the Wright brothers flew the first airplane (Bakshi, 1999). However, the first fledging use of air power occurred during World War I between 1914 and 1918 where airplanes were initially employed for scouting, artillery detection, and reconnaissance. This was
Their job is: to ensure that all regions are receiving the proper amount of support, to prevent opposition forces from taking advantage of the situation and to communicate with local government / military officials / NGOs / nonprofit organizations. This will streamline decision making and ensure that there is effective collaboration among personnel. Moreover, this individual has experience in working with disasters and other security operations. (Warning Order) ("Navy
The author makes his most poignant statement when he concludes, "…Nothing has such a depressing influence on the soldier, as the sound of the enemy's cannon afresh as the moment when, after a forced march he seeks some rest…" and falls into the "…law of the enemy" (158). Author John Nagl points out that the strategies promoted by Antoine-Henri Jomini -- another well-known and respected military theorist -- and Clausewitz
The weakness here is that, given the specificity of the situation analyzed in the article, the conclusions are not nearly as broadly applicable as the author seems to imply. Doubtless the conclusions can be related to other events to some degree, but the author himself acknowledges that a lack of experts on Somalia was instrumental in the ultimate failure of the intervention, and other countries would require other experts
World War I is fundamentally similar to warfare as it is practiced today. This paper reviews the relevant literature to provide evidence in support of the argument that World War I is fundamentally similar to warfare as it is practiced today. Major and Supporting Points of Evidence There were numerous innovations in military ordnance and munitions that took place during and following the U.S. Civil War, but the purpose of the warfare
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now