Literature Review / How Organizational Theories Improve Operations
Organizational theories provide a framework for understanding how businesses operate. By understanding the different types of organizations and the way they function, managers can make more informed decisions about how to improve operations. For example, theories of bureaucracy can help managers to identify inefficiencies in their organization and to implement policies that will improve productivity. In addition, theories of organizational design can help managers to create a more effective structure for their business. By understanding and applying these theories, managers can make significant improvements to the way their businesses operate.
Operations management is the process of planning, organizing, and controlling the resources needed to produce goods and services. Classical theory is a branch of operations management that emphasizes efficiency and predictability. Its key insights can be used to improve operations in a number of ways. For example, classical theory can help managers to develop more efficient processes, to better utilize resources, and to minimize the risk of disruptions. In addition, classical theory can be used to improve communication and coordination among workers. By understanding and applying the insights of classical theory, operations managers can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of their organizations.
Symbolic organization theory is another perspective that can be used to improve operations within a company. This theory suggests that businesses are organized around culturally-defined symbols that give meaning to the work being done (Hassard, 2002). By understanding the role of symbols in organizational life, managers can make decisions that will improve employee satisfaction and motivation. In addition, this understanding can help managers to create a more efficient and effective workplace (Hatch, 2018). As businesses become increasingly complex, the need for strong leadership that understands the importance of symbolic organization theory will only grow. Those who can effectively use this theory to guide their decision-making will be well-positioned to succeed in the ever-changing business world.
Another theoretical perspective that can be helpful in improving operations is whether to make an organization open or closed. Organizational systems can be either open or closed, and each has its own advantages and disadvantages. Closed systems are highly centralized and...
…food and shelter, must be met before people can satisfy higher-level needs, such as the need for self-actualization. According to Maslow (1943), once a need is satisfied, it is no longer a motivator. Maslows (1943) theory can be used to improve operations by identifying which needs are most important to employees and making sure that these needs are met. For example, if employees are not being paid enough to meet their basic needs, they will not be motivated to work hard or be productive. By addressing this issue, employers can improve employee motivation and productivity.Yet, as Gerhart and Fang (2015) point out, in any organization, both intrinsic and extrinsic forms of motivation play an important role in driving employee productivity and engagement. Intrinsic motivation comes from within oneself, whereas extrinsic motivation is externally driven. While intrinsic motivation is more internal and often more difficult to foster, it can be more powerful in terms of its impact on employee behavior. A motivated workforce is essential for any organization that wants to improve its operations. Ultimately, by understanding the role that motivation plays…
References
Araral, E. (2020). Why do cities adopt smart technologies? Contingency theory and evidence from the United States. Cities, 106, 102873.
Boissier, O., Hübner, J. F., & Sichman, J. S. (2006, September). Organization oriented programming: From closed to open organizations. In International Workshop on Engineering Societies in the Agents World (pp. 86-105). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Gebert, D., & Boerner, S. (1999). The open and the closed corporation as conflicting forms of organization. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35(3), 341-359.
Contingency Theories Leadership • Situational Approach (chapter 5) • Contingency Theory (chapter 6) • Path-Goal Theory (chapter 7) Behavioral Learning Objectives: Students explore contingency theories leadership identify theory employ . Contingency Theories of Leadership Leadership is the process in which a person influences others towards achievement of a common goal. It is a social influence process and can only exist where there is a leader and some followers Waldman et al. 823 (
Contingency Theory and Global Leadership JUST HOW APT Contingency Theory Emphasizes Problems and Issues in Global Situations The contingency theory of leadership fits the leader to the situation (Northouse, 2012). It tests his effectiveness on the basis of his style, hence, the term "contingency." Three factors characterize the theory, namely leader-member relations, task structure, and position power (Northouse). This current environment of globalization endows leaders with a host of benefits (Cantoria, 2012). Among these
Contingency Theory of Leadership Fiedler's Contingency Theory of Leadership Applied in the Non-Profit Organizational Context In evaluating leader-member relations and leadership styles implemented in a non-profit organization, Fred Fiedler's Contingency Theory of Leadership is useful for this specific purpose. Fiedler's theory posits that "the style of the leader and the leader's acceptance by subordinates had a strong effect on the performance of the group." Further, Fiedler categorizes leadership into three (3) "styles,"
Fiedler's Contingency Theory The overarching claim of Fiedler's contingency theory is that leadership is defined more directly by the situation or context into which a leader is thrust than by the nature of the leader himself. The basic premise is that leaders will define themselves in low-stress and high-stress situations. Ideally, according to Fiedler, a leader will be selected whose traits are compatible with the organization and its personnel or failing
Path-Goal Contingency Theory organization. Explain theory works include examples. 2. Explain effect power influence leaders followers organization. Leadership is one of the key concepts in the military, as leaders need to command their subordinates by taking on attitudes that provide purpose, guidance, and incentive. A military leader has to concentrate on completing missions and on guaranteeing the welfare of his or her subordinates in the process. When considering leadership strategies,
Contingency management might in fact afford managers more flexibility in the short-term. Perhaps the best approach to management in the electronics industry or any industry is one that is combined, that allows certain elements of various theories to be incorporated into practice (Selden & Sowa, 2004). Any theory can be measured by whether or not it achieves its ultimate goals, which include the overall success and profitability of an organization
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now