Verified Document

Civil War Of Northern Aggression Is The Term Paper

Civil War of Northern Aggression Is the Term Accurate?

The Civil war has been one of the most controversial topics in the history of United States. Where it has been given many names like War Between the States, the War of the Rebellion and the War for Southern Independence, one of its most controversial names is the War of Northern Aggression. There is an enormous amount of literature written on the subject matter in the form of books, articles, research papers etc. however, James McPherson has managed to present a rather accurate and unbiased account of civil war. According to McPherson, despite the violence showed by Northern States, it was the secession of the southern states and initiation in firing the first shot which started the war in the first place[footnoteRef:1]. Therefore, considering that Southern states were just operating in their defensive mode would present a rather inaccurate account of the history. [1: James M. McPherson, Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era (Oxford University Press, 2003).]

The American Civil War is presented as the war of ideologies between two wings of states i.e. Northern and Southern states. Where the intention of Northern states was to abolish the slavery and conform to a common federal government, Southern states initiated the secession of the Confederate states which lead to the formation of Confederacy. The warfare continued for more than four years which resulted in enormous bloodshed and then ended up in the surrender of Confederacy. Following this surrender, the slavery was abolished everywhere in United States and the efforts of Abraham Lincoln to restore the Union became fruitful.

If the course of events from 1860 onwards is observed, it will be noticed that Northern and Southern states were fighting a war of confused philosophies which transformed several times during the war. Where Northern States believed in formation of a singular federal government...

Parts of this document are hidden

View Full Document
svg-one

But in-depth analysis would reveal that the intent of Southern states was rather unclear. Ignoring the loss that Southern states had to go through, one would identify that if the initiation of war by Southern states is called struggle for independence, one can raise a question that from whom they wanted the independence. Was it a war of cause or bloodshed over ego of few states?
The work of James McPherson presents a rather neutral account of the civil war. According to him, the Northern states were provoked by Southern states' aggression. In the presidential elections of 1860, Lincoln presented an idea of abolishing slavery and abandoning its further extension beyond the states in which it was already present. At this point, the Southern states did share their concerns making the Republicans aware of the threats of disunion. After the elections of 1860 which resulted in Republican victory, it was evident that the measures presented by Lincoln would be accepted nationwide. As a result of this probability, the Southern states formed their confederacy and declared their secession. However, this confederacy failed to gain the advocacy of and recognition from the former government of President James Buchanan and the incoming government of Lincoln. Furthermore, no foreign government showed their support for the Confederacy.

Considering the course of events, it is evident that prior to the bloodshed, many chances were given to the Southern states to opt for a peaceful course of actions and show their alliance to the Union. McPherson presents an argument that more than the role of ideology; it was the result of battles fought during these four years which decided the fate of the Civil War. Also, McPherson believes that Lincoln was an ideal leader for those times with a single and clear motive: to save the Union. Where many historians have presented Lincoln as the leader who abolished slavery, McPherson has managed to prove that the idea behind Lincoln's effort was to keep all the states under one flag…

Sources used in this document:
Work Cited

McPherson, James M. Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era, Oxford University Press, 2003.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

History in the Making: Fight for Rights
Words: 898 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

History In the Making: Fight for Rights There are numerous definition of history that are adapted by different groups. Of interest though is the fact that they share a period that is in the past. Among the many definitions fronted by Word Net (2011) is "the continuum of events occurring in succession leading from the past to the present and even into the future." This definition arouses interest in our case

History in the 19th Century:
Words: 997 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

It was an important event in the nation's history because it was the first time that America was dominated by internal conflicts that challenged its democracy (Fortuna, n.d.). However, once the fighting came to an end, its significance became clear because of its effects on the American society. Despite of taking more than 60,000 lives, the American Civil War contributed to the establishment of the Democratic South and Republican North.

History of Free Blacks As
Words: 1740 Length: 6 Document Type: Essay

Therefore, the triple threats of physical violence, sexual violence, and disruption of the family were probably the most serious daily complaint of 19th century slaves. Many of the complaints that slaves had were based on the limitations that they faced in their daily lives. In the early days of slavery, slaves had much more practical freedom than they had after the growth of plantations and the related dependence on slave

History of John Adams and
Words: 1686 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

As many historians admit, his skills in argument and rhetoric were instrumental in getting the Declaration accepted by the American people. As mentioned, this was not an easy task, as there were many who were opposed and some leaders even threatened that "...their states would secede from the fragile union if independence were declared. Leaders of the Congress, such as Adams, risked being executed as traitors to the Crown"

History of Zionism Is the Political Movement
Words: 1662 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

History Of Zionism Zionism is the political movement that arose in Europe in the late 19th century with the aim of creating a Jewish state in Palestine. It asserted that the Jewish people were a separate nation and were entitled to have a country of their own and succeeded in its objective with the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948. Since then, the Zionist movement has concentrated on strengthening Israel

History As Myth This-Based Myth Atreus Thyestes
Words: 1157 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

History As Myth This-based Myth Atreus Thyestes In paper I conversational I supposed a myth teacher a continuing education program geared library patrons aged 50+, a conversation actual essay. Below directions assignment: Briefly describe a historical event, a controversy, a world event, a current event, a military group action, a political event group, a religious group action, a similar phenomenon. Thyestes and Atreus: The great Civil War of Mycenae Once upon a time,

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now