Verified Document

Civil War Both Sides Fought Term Paper

A stronger Navy allowed the North to enforce the blockade more effectively than the Confederacy could overcome it. The second significant part of the Anaconda Plan was similar in scope and strategic significance: to take control of the Mississippi. When the Union Army eventually did gain control of the mighty Mississippi, the South was effectively split in two. The Anaconda Plan was fulfilled. Not only did the Union have the means by which to enforce their strategies: the Confederacy also lacked as clear a military plan. While the blockade was nearly automatic and put into place toward the beginning of the war, control over the Mississippi was harder-fought. It meant encroachment deep into Southern territory, where most of the war was fought. Not until 1863 and the Union victory at the Battle of Vicksburg did the Union manage to infiltrate the River and successfully set up its second major and decisive blockade of the South.

Unlike the North, the South did not have an advanced transportation infrastructure that would have enabled it to overcome the blockades. Cut off from supplies, the South would have benefited more from a shorter, more intense war. Most battles were fought on Southern soil, which provided both advantages and disadvantages for the Confederacy. While intimate geographical knowledge aided the Confederate generals in key military victories, the population decimation and the lack of transportation infrastructure depleted Southern resources by the end of the war. The South also lacked the naval power necessary to properly defend its coastline against the much more powerful Northern Navy.

Still, the South proved remarkably resilient. Outnumbered significantly, and outdone in terms of military resources, the South secured enough success to cripple the north and cause the war to drag on. The Civil War could have been won by the South, based on its remarkable ability to stun the Union...

Confederate strength can be symbolized by the infamous battle between the two iron-clad ships the Monitor and the Merrimack, which ended in a draw in spite of the North's seafaring advantage. In order to win, the South would have had to bolster its military via international aide. Moreover, the South could not rely on slaves to fight in the war. They might have needed to promise freedom for the slaves in exchange for their service in battle: an unlikely plan in light of the overwhelming racism that pervaded Southern culture.
The North eventually won the Civil War for several reasons. First, it had the advantage of population size: an estimated 2.5 to 1 differential; or 22 million persons versus 9 million in the South ("Why the Union Won"). Second, the North trumped the South in terms of its industrial prowess. Factories, manufacturing, and transportation infrastructure aided the Union victory. Similarly, a more effective ship-building industry promoted the Union navy. One of the South's weaknesses was its lack of naval power even though the Civil War was mainly a ground war. Third, the South failed to convert its economic relationship with Europe to political or military support. Fourth, the longer the war lasted, the more likely it was for a Union victory because of the successful blockade. Finally, the turning point of the war at the Battle of Gettysburg proved that in spite of its initially tenuous leadership personnel, Union army generals like Ulysses S. Grant had what it took to capitalize on the North's many advantages to ensure victory.

References

Debating Who Actually Won the Civil War." Dummies.com. Retrieved Nov 19, 2006 at http://www.dummies.com/WileyCDA/DummiesArticle/id-1229.html

Feldmeth, Greg D. "Secession and Civil War." U.S. History Resources. 31 March 1998. Retrieved Nov 19, 2006 at http://home.earthlink.net/~gfeldmeth/USHistory.html

The History Place. "The U.S. Civil War 1861-1865." Retrieved Nov 19, 2006 at http://www.historyplace.com/civilwar/

Why did the North Win the Civil War?" Retrieved Nov 19, 2006 at http://www.socialstudieshelp.com/Lesson_35_Notes.htm

Sources used in this document:
References

Debating Who Actually Won the Civil War." Dummies.com. Retrieved Nov 19, 2006 at http://www.dummies.com/WileyCDA/DummiesArticle/id-1229.html

Feldmeth, Greg D. "Secession and Civil War." U.S. History Resources. 31 March 1998. Retrieved Nov 19, 2006 at http://home.earthlink.net/~gfeldmeth/USHistory.html

The History Place. "The U.S. Civil War 1861-1865." Retrieved Nov 19, 2006 at http://www.historyplace.com/civilwar/

Why did the North Win the Civil War?" Retrieved Nov 19, 2006 at http://www.socialstudieshelp.com/Lesson_35_Notes.htm
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Civil War 1861-1865
Words: 1023 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

Civil War represents a decisive period in American history, but also one of violence, during which more than 620,000 Americans died. (Gary B. Nash, Carter Smith, page 144) The American Civil War was fought between North and the South, and started as a result of their differences regarding slavery, state's rights and federal authority. The decisive moment was when Republican candidate Abraham Lincoln won the election, and become the president

Civil War How Did It Happen That
Words: 939 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Civil War How did it happen that the North won the Civil War, notwithstanding the fact that the South had its own powerful advantages? This paper explores that question using chapters 11, 12, 13 and 14 for reference sources. Background on the Southern economy and politics The South greatly expanded its agricultural industry (the plantation system) between 1800 and 1860, and in doing so became "increasingly unlike the North," the author explains in

Civil War Would the Union Still Have
Words: 1383 Length: 4 Document Type: Thesis

Civil War Would the union still have won the civil war if the Border States separated? The union would have still won if the Border States separated. During the Civil War the Border States, Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky, and Missouri, were not critical to the unions victory over the confederates. Unfortunately, our modern society has been marred with war and strife over its eventful lifespan. A civil disagreement, when accompanied by mass offenses, often

Civil War in a Long War, All
Words: 1329 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

Civil War In a long war, all of the economic, financial and population advantages would favor the North since the South was a mostly agrarian region that imported its manufactured goods. Initially, both sides had expected that the war would be short and decisive, although by 1862 it was clear that it might drag on indefinitely. Jefferson Davis, Robert E. Lee and the other Southern leaders realized that their best chance

Civil War Understanding the American Civil War
Words: 2034 Length: 7 Document Type: Essay

CIVIL WAR UNDERSTANDING THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR The American Civil War represented the largest loss of life in the West during the 100-year period between the Napoleonic Wars in 1815 and World War I in 1914 (McPherson, 2013). The number of Americans who lost their lives in this war is equivalent to the total American lives lost in all other conflicts in this nation's history. Any conflict of that magnitude is bound

Civil War How the Civil
Words: 2408 Length: 7 Document Type: Research Proposal

The war and the years that preceded it led to the creation of social classes in our country. These classes consisted of the rich upper-class down to the poor immigrants; and each class had its own rules and regulations by which it lived. To this day, a large part of our society is based on classes. Socially, the war divided races and started what would lead to racism, bigotry, and

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now