China
Under Communism, Confucian values, considered vestiges of the old feudal system, were supposed to have been completely swept away. Judging from what you have read from the readings, do you believe Confucianism completely disappeared after 1949?
Confucianism is the philosophical and ethical system of belief based upon the teachings of the Chinese philosopher Confucius. The core belief of Confucianism was humanism which is the belief that human beings can change, adapt, and grow. No one's identity or personality is concrete and anyone can learn from their mistakes and change. People are asked to make decisions using reason, logic, and critical thinking. When the Communists took control of China in the, Confucianism was abandoned officially because those in charge did not want people thinking for themselves. Instead, the people were to listen to the word of the government and to accept their demands without question. Although under Chairman Mao and the Communist regime, Confucianism was officially disbanded as the primary political and philosophical structure of the country, the people had never completely altered their individual beliefs. It is human nature to think and to question, hopefully. They may have thought and questioned in silence, but the people were never completely capable of becoming wholly indoctrinated in the views of the government.
Instead of Confucianism, the people were ordered to accept Communism and the Three Principles of the People. These three principles are: Minzu (nationalism, specifically a nation untied under the same purpose), Minquan (democracy but in actuality referred to the concept that the government was working for the people whether they thought so or not), and Minsheng (the People's welfare or socialized welfare). Supposedly the principles were ensuring that the new government provided for the people, but this was not really so. Each of the principles concentrated in turning a person with individual goals into one who would be focused on actions which would be for the good of all the people within the nation, in whatever capacity the government said. Those who did not follow the word of Chairman Mao and the Communist party would be punished. In Red Azalea, Anchee Min says, "To obey Mao's teaching is a crime" (14). Punishing those who dissent is an efficient way of getting cooperation, but can have consequences as well. This served to ensure obedience from the majority of the population, but also could not help but engender in some the understanding that this system was unfair and that the people were not really being represented. For the members of the population in this group, the old ways of Confucianism became more appealing.
People who were part of the intellectual community in China had an especially difficult time in adapting to the new Communist regime which did not allow for much individuality and strictly prohibited unique or critical thinking. In order to survive and indeed to thrive in this community, everyone had to give up their personal freedoms and become a part of the unquestioning masses so desired by Chairman Mao and his numerous cohorts in the Chinese Communist Party. There was a "struggle between the two schools in order to maintain the balance between state interests and the participation of elite scholars in the imperial enterprise" (Elliott 124). This is often the way of things in an unyielding and strict governmental structure. The tighter the vice grip on the minds and imaginations of the community, the more the likelihood that the people will struggle against the yoke of injustice until they are finally able to find relief.
To disobey the Communist party, even silently and within a person's own home was one of the most dangerous things a person could do. Whenever something becomes against the will of the government, there will be factions of people who determine that this is simply the best course of action. Communist China was no exception. There were many people who realized that the society in which they lived was inequitable and the people were not being treated fairly. Some of them spoke up and were punished, including capital punishment. Other people saw the inequality and stayed silent....
Asian History is largely a story of power and subjugation. Being unfree and disempowered as been unfortunately normative, which is why the last vestiges of what Dahl, Nexo and Prendergast call "unfreedom" stand out in the modern era. North Korea is perhaps the most potent and extreme example of unfreedom in the world. As Daniel Gordon shows in the documentary feature A State of Mind, the people of North Korea blame
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now