Verified Document

China Housing Reforms Research Paper

China's Urban Housing Development -- a Shift from Welfare Housing to Home Ownership The challenge of housing in China has been on the national agenda for more that four decades now. A lot of efforts have been directed by the government to help solve the challenge and it has substantially achieved a significant mileage. This paper will delve into the policies informing the urban housing reforms, the evolution that the housing reforms has undergone over the years, the challenges it faced, the current situation of China in terms of housing and also discuss the trend that are prevalent in China and what the government is currently doing to ensure the dream of housing for every China citizen is achieved.

Overview of housing reform agenda

The landscape of China as a whole has been undergoing several changes and shifts in the political, social and the economic aspect of it. This prompted massive changes in infrastructure and the housing sector was one of the areas that were significantly affected, with massive shifts in the way the general population was housed and the policies that guided housing of the growing population. The crisis in housing of the urban population in China was predominantly responsible for the shift from the welfare housing system geared towards providing low-cost housing in urban areas established with the coming into place of the People's Republic of China in 1949. In this system, the government built houses and them allowed the citizens to occupy them at a nominal rent charged per month. In the mid 1950s there was a socialist transformation and the housing sector was no longer able to support itself, the fees was reduced and henceforth the after construction expenditure could not be met (Yang Z. & Chen J., 2014:Pp15).

The Housing Reform: Stages and policies

Chine experienced a fresh beginning in the housing sector which saw the significant change of the urban housing system moving from the welfare housing to the trend of home ownership. This began in December 1978 when the Third Plenum of the Eleventh Central Committee was convened in Beijing. It was ta this point that China began to move away from the centrally planned economy and that included the housing sector which was highly centralized in the stringent socialist regime. The housing sector was a very important sector to the government and even in the process of decentralizing the economy and allowing most of the economic aspect to be dictated by the market demand, it was extremely difficult for the government of China to expressly let go of the housing sector. Hence, they carried out several experimental projects towards commercializing the housing sector and the urban public housing in specific. In 1980, China's paramount leader, Deng Xiaoping indicated that there was need for liberalizing the housing sector to compete in the market driven economy. He indicated that the individual China citizens were to be allowed to own homes through purchasing, building their own or even purchase the old homes from the government projects and be allowed to pay for them over a ten to fifteen years grace period. He also indicated that there would be an upward adjustment of the rent fee in the public sector houses, a factor that was geared towards encouraging people to buy or even build houses of their own rather than renting one since the financial implications would be the same. However, in line with this increment, he suggested that the low income bracket citizens will have to be subsidized (Liu Z. & Mei C., 2013:Pp9-10). The new housing policies were aimed at encouraging a closer relationship between the private and the public sector as the private sector was effectively being introduced into active participation in the housing construction.

The declaration by Deng Xiaoping was a landmark turning point for the public housing system that had been in place for more that 30 years and it gave room for more policies thereafter that would see the actual implementation of the changes that were desired in the housing sector. It gave way for the subsequent experiments and policies in the bid to shift the public housing system from the welfare structure to the market driven ownership of houses. Several cities were subject to experiments with the aim of using them as the pilot projects for sale of the public sector houses and also reorganizing housing production to ensure there is enough returns in the housing investment. These measures to transition from the previous system to the home ownership ran on experimental basis between 1980 and 1988, and since this time the public sector...

This was not a very significant shift since in 1982 it was pegged at 17%, however, the significant change was that the work-units started to have more control over the public housing than the local authorities.
The ideology of privatization of the housing sector was a noble initiative, however, the government still felt that the socialist regime was the best in providing social equity and allowing the complete privatization of the housing sector and absolute lack of control would drift the system to a capitalist one which would be detrimental to their people. This made the central government weary of instituting and implementing fundamental structural changes in line with property rights. This made the government to focus more on improving on the efficiency in the public sector through allowing the people and their organized groups to take control of leasing rights over the public property. This indicated that the central government in pursuit of the economic reforms, was more geared towards marketization of the housing sector over the privatization. The government was making efforts to introduce competition in the market among private players but without necessarily privatization of the public property. To achieve this, the central government encouraged the state agencies and the locally owned enterprises to get into competition with each other, albeit still retaining the ownership of those enterprises or owned by the local government.

Some of the significant shift in policies experienced in this period included the mass selling of the public houses hitherto belonging to government at the building cost alone without adding any other additional costs on the building cost. The public housing sales were also highly subsidized to those who wanted to buy them, and for those that remained to be rented had their rents increased steadily each passing year with an aim of encouraging the citizens to buy them instead of remaining in them as tenants. In 1984 the concept of real estate was officially and legally recognized to encourage more people to build houses and sell and even of their own, however, since the socialist approach to property ownership was still predominant, even these houses were built and purchased in groups in most instances (Hui X., 2009).

This first attempt to urbanization of housing did not work very well for the government due to the conservative approach that it was given. The ten years of experiment changed little in China housing landscape. There was housing shortage in the urban regions, the allocations of the public property was skewed towards the influential families and the rich people, the investment into this sector was minimal and the management of the public houses and property rented out was still very poor. The ever increasing rents were resisted by tenants due to the high inflation that was experienced during that time, the favoritism given to the rich families was met with criticism and instead of increasing the public ownership of houses it ended up increasing the housing expenditure in the family budgets. The experimental housing redistribution had essentially failed to take place as was envisioned.

The failures experienced in the initial ten years prompted a response that was initiated in early 1990s with the onset of the shift in ideological, social and economic approaches. The top-down approach to urbanization of housing continued and this time confirmed that marketization was the approach that would be used henceforth. The 'Socialistic Market Economy' was adopted in the 14th National Congress of the Communist party and this marked a significant change in tact in housing reforms and a departure from the planned economy. In this new marketization of the economy and housing reforms in particular, land is an inalienable part of the change hence in 1990 the law was amended to treat the previously state owned land in China and now land was viewed as a commodity. In the now market economy, the release of land use transfer saw the growth of real estate development and on the other side land and housing speculations grew. This speculation caused the economy to overheat hence the government had to come in and increase the levels of "macro control" to oversee and moderate the real estate economy.

In 1994, yet another significant decision was made that saw the housing reform escalated to urban housing system. In this approach, there were two sets of policies that were envisioned would ensure people…

Sources used in this document:
References

Hui X., (2009). The Chinese Hoiusing reform and the Following New Urban Question. Retrieved April 2,2015 from http://newurbanquestion.ifou.org/proceedings/3%20The%20Urbanized%20Society/full%20papers/B008_Xiaoxi_The%20Chinese%20Housing%20Reform%20and%20the%20following%20New%20Urban%20Questions-fullpaper_revised.pdf

Liu Z. & Mei C., (2013). Experiment-based Policy Making or Conscious Policy Design? The Case of Urban Housing Reform in China. Retrieved April 2,2015 from http://www.icpublicpolicy.org/IMG/pdf/panel_11_s1_mei_liu.pdf

Yang Z. & Chen J., (2014). Housing Affordability and Housing Policy in Urban China. SpringerBriefs in Economics. Retrieved April 2,2015 from http://www.google.co.ke/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CDYQFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springer.com%2Fcda%2Fcontent%2Fdocument%2Fcda_downloaddocument%2F9783642540431-c2.pdf%3FSGWID%3D0-0-45-1440212-p176464947&ei=R80fVZDVG4XVaoCXgdgE&usg=AFQjCNEhb1RhJuJyvxM0gC1oOaTU9ocbJA&sig2=vA52GOb75JR6iaesZq0cRQ&bvm=bv.89947451,d.bGg

Youqin H., (2013). Lack of Affordable Housing Threatens China's Urban Dream. Retrieved April 2,2015 from https://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/6365-Lack-of-affordable-housing-threatens-China-s-urban-dream
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Housing Market in China
Words: 3029 Length: 12 Document Type: Essay

Housing Market in China: A Critical Survey of the Literature This is a critical survey of the literature on the state of housing market in China. It highlights the high and rising cost of housing in major markets, which have attracted worldwide attention, as well as the interest of the Chinese government. It is difficult to understand the Chinese housing market without delving into the background. In this regard, the

China and Urbanization What Are
Words: 759 Length: 2 Document Type: Discussion Chapter

Moreover, the "Great Leap Forward" was a negative response to "urban-centered planning strategies; and the "Cultural Revolution" involved the "excision of tens of millions of urban educated from the cities" in an effort to "dissipate the new and threatening forces of urban-based elitism" (Kirkby, p. 5). As to what tasks the government has taken regarding urbanization since 1949, Article 10 of the 1958 law ordered each residence to have a

China the Political System of
Words: 3103 Length: 10 Document Type: Research Proposal

The new reform policies set up industries producing appliances, textiles, garments, computers, mobile phones and other inexpensive manufactured goods (Shekarabi & Rabii 2007). While China opened up to foreign investments and the outside world, its leaders assured that the transition to a market-oriented economy would be complemented with policies to promote social stability. As foreign money pours into the Chinese markets, research and development in various fields advance the status

China & India: Rapid Economic Growth --
Words: 1435 Length: 5 Document Type: Essay

China & India: Rapid Economic Growth -- Additional pages Additional Introduction / Conclusion Copy How did China and India emerge so rapidly as enormous economic powers? This paper reviews the circumstances of the economic advancement that both countries have made, and establishes that these nations became economic powerhouses due to the sheer size of their economies -- along with the strategies they employed. The Indian economy has been among the "fastest growing economies"

History of China's Importance to the U.S.,
Words: 6315 Length: 20 Document Type: Research Paper

history of China's importance to the U.S., from Nixon's visit to China in 1972 to the present, which contributed to the implementation of Obama's 'U.S. Pivot to Asia Strategy'? The Cold War represented one of the most important periods in the history of the world. It did not only changed the way in which the political world was configured following the end of the Second World War, but, at the

China's Cultures and Politics Affect
Words: 2248 Length: 8 Document Type: Term Paper

The fact that communism still dominates affairs in the country can limit or discourage foreign investors. This is probably one of the main reasons for which large corporations are hesitant about investing large amounts of money in China (Weatherbee & Emmers 42). The masses no longer express interest in U.S. cultural values because it appears that the U.S. has experienced significant problems consequent to the 9/11 events. This enabled China

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now