For example, student who cheats on a first aid exam and then performs a life-saving technique jeopardizes the other person's life. A law student who cheats his or her way through school does not provide adequate representation for clients. Any time a student gets away with cheating in class, a bad precedence has been set. That student learns that cheating leads to success, and may cheat in their business transactions and even in their romantic relationships. Cheating can essentially become a way of life.
If the student is caught cheating in school, the practical effects are more direct. First, the student violates the teacher's trust. That teacher is unlikely to spend time with that student and offer personalized support. The student might stop showing up for class at all. Some students cheat defiantly, pointing out that a heavy work load "made them do it." Second, the student might fail that particular course. Teachers have every right to flunk students who cheat. That means not only did the student waste time but also tuition money. Third, the student might get kicked out of school. This most serious consequence could even prevent that individual from being accepted to another university. Being expelled can spell disaster for academic and professional success. The consequences of cheating are therefore, long-term.
Cheating in school also creates a climate in which education is devalued. The objective of education is viewed as grades rather than knowledge. Students who cheat do not care if they learn; they only care that they achieve good grades or a diploma. However, the consequences of cheating outweigh any potential benefits in this regard. The effects of cheating can therefore be classified into personal psychological effects; practical effects; moral effects; and social effects. To get good grades, the student sacrifices the very bedrock of education. The student loses moral character instead of building it. The student fails to acquire the skills needed to perform in a professional environment. The student who cheats degrades the educational system and makes it more difficult for honest students to receive the quality of education they deserve.
This presented the troubling consideration that many of the current standard-bearers for physical excellence were the product of performance enhancing drug use. Moreover, this cast a dark shadow on what have been regarded as some of the game's greatest recent accomplishments, which had been achieved through cheating. In that vein, Canseco's claim was succeeded by an admission that seemed to justify this reproach. Mark McGwire, Canseco's former Oakland Athletic teammate,
Cheating is a relative term and most likely has numerous different definitions that depend on the point-of-view of the event and persons involved. Human beings are not perfect and are expected to fall short of expectations on a daily basis. Due to the inherent flaws in man, cheating will definitely occur. My personal definition of cheating is as follows: cheating is an intentional act that intends to deceive or gain
There are three types of goals to focus one: short-term, medium-term, and long-term goals. In a study environment, short-term goals would refer to attending classes, handing in assignments and studying for tests and other assessments. The study schedule plays the most important role in this type of goal. Furthermore helping to achieve this goal is the sections relating to academic honesty, as well as research and studying skills. Each goal
Materialism flourished as a core ideal of American culture throughout the 20th century and most likely fueled the tendency to cheat in school. Moreover, the secularization of American society made it so that students were not inundated with the fear of spiritual retribution for cheating. It is highly likely that in a secular society cheating becomes easier, and more acceptable. However, religion may have nothing to do with the
Now we have examined two extremes in educational thought that have developed over the past century. Teacher centered and student centered philosophies differ significantly in their approach to the student-teacher relationship. Teacher centered philosophy does not depend on the student's wants and needs at all. Teacher centered philosophy uses antiquated methods, such as rote learning. However, these methods are quickly being replaced by a more student-centered approach. Student centered approaches
Student Plagiarism Online World" Julie J.C.H. Ryan, book "The Conscious Reader, 12th edition" Do Not Cheat There are several valid points in Julie J.C.H. Ryan's article in The Conscious Reader, the 12th Edition -- "Student Plagiarism in an Online World." The author's central premise, of course, is that the internet has made it increasingly easier for students to plagiarize and offer someone else's written material as their own. Another fundamental part
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now