Changing Threats/Historical Eras
Discussion response: Changing threats
The American public's perception of threats has clearly shifted since the tragic events of 9/11 from an emphasis on state-based actors in the wake of the Cold War era to non-state-based actors in the era of terrorism. Rather than threats to American security projected as something which occurs 'over there' in foreign lands, or the threat of destruction through nuclear war, the fear of home-grown attacks has grown and been further exacerbated by additional highly-publicized, more recent terror incidents, such as the Boston Marathon bombings. States such as New York that are deemed high-priority threats are working harder to coordinate anti-terror efforts with federal agencies and are seeking to consistently engage in coordinated anti-terror exercises and planning activities, to ensure a more seamless response in the face of a likely future onslaught. "The 9/11 Commission Report highlighted the need for improved operational...
According to Toronto Star reporter Stephan Handelman in an article printed in 2005, the U.S. senior intelligence analysts consider China to be the greatest long-term threat to U.S. stability. China's military force and computer intelligence has reached its peak. Both the Europeans and the U.S. agree that the expansion of the Chinese military is more than "worrisome." Another article posted on November 16, 2007 by the Washington Post claims that spying
The lack of action over Rwanda should be the defining scandal of the presidency Bill Clinton. Yet in the slew of articles on the Clinton years that followed Clinton's departure from power, there was barely a mention of the genocide." The UN, pressured by the British and the U.S., and others, refused to use the word "genocide" during the event, or afterward when it issued its official statement of condemnation
Peace was only temporary. Every generation had predictions echoing that humankind had acquired a lesson (Herting, 2011). In Thailand, the concept of globalization dates back from time immemorial. The country has engaged in cultural exchanges and international commerce for a long time. However, recent communication and transport advances have heightened the rate of change. This has made the world appear like a much smaller place for global populations. Different authors
conception and function of public space change as historical shifts influence the delineation between public and personal rights and property. Boyer states that there is an underlying tension in the application of reference to historical styles present in the creation of public spaces, representing nostalgic yearning for past times remembered as greater than the articulation of the present. Boyer also references Walter Benjamin's theory that "all history writer in
Question 1: Can all non-state actor threats be addressed unilaterally as a non-traditional threat to only one country? Do some of these non-traditional threats span borders and require international cooperation to counter the threat? If so, why? What problems might such cooperation bring? Of course, it is possible for state actors to unilaterally address non-state actor threats. Whether it is advisable for state actors to unilaterally address non-state actor threats is
Soviet Union and Stalin Era Understanding of Stalin and Soviet Union The Soviet economic system persisted for around 60 years and even after the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, the basic elements of the system still existed. The leaders exercising the most substantial influence on this system were -- Vladimir I. Lenin and Stalin, who started the prevailing patterns of collectivization and industrialization that became typical characteristic of the Soviet
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now