Verified Document

Chain Command Links Uniformed Service Senior Junior, Essay

chain command links uniformed service senior junior, junior ranks President United States. There great levels In some ways, the individual soldiers in the field have the greatest amount of responsibility in terms of understanding and actually actuating the rules of engagement (ROE) within the limited war ideology of Vietnam. The others in the chain of command are responsible for determining their actions, as well as the overall military action of the United States in a martial encounter such as Vietnam. The individual soldiers are responsible for actually carrying them out. For instance, when it was decided that the president of one of the Vietnamese factions was to be assassinated, it was the individual soldiers in the U.S. military that were actually accountable for doing this deed. However, there are others in the chain of command that have a utilitarian role on the battlefield that can, at times, greatly resemble that of individual soldiers. For instance, battalion commanders and division commanders may see combat -- the likelihood that the former does so is extremely high, in fact. Still, these two positions in the chain of command and that of General Westmoreland are responsible for contriving and carrying out tactics.

For the most part, it is the job of battalion commanders to lead individual soldiers in the field. They do so quite literally and are charged with taking orders from their superiors and implementing them in the theater of war. Battalion commanders can be supported...

100). From a tactical perspective, the battalion leaders must report the progress of their battalions (which, of course, consist of individual soldiers) to their superiors who will adjust their tactics or adhere to them accordingly. Similarly, the battalion leaders are tasked with following the orders of their superiors and making sure that their individual soldiers do so accordingly. It is because of the presence of battalion leaders and the formation of their regiment that the actions of individual soldiers are cohesive and that, once on the battlefield, the U.S. military is able to move in unity.
The division commanders during the Vietnam War were tasked with overseeing the efforts of the individual battalions that comprised specific divisions. Division commanders were key to the war efforts and to the chain of command in general because they could influence both tactical and overall strategic decision-making within this particular framework. From a tactical perspective, they were able to monitor the progress of the various battalions that were involved in their divisions. Examples of strategies include the strategic hamlets, which largely failed due to tactical implementation and cultural failures (Friedman). In this manner they were able to gauge the tactics of the opposition, as well as to see which tactical maneuvering on the part of the U.S. proved most efficacious. However, these…

Sources used in this document:
References

Arendt, H. (1972). Crises of the Republic. New York: Harcourt Brace.

Friedman, H.A. (No date). "Psyop of the strategic hamlet in Vietnam." Retrieved from http://www.psywarrior.com/VNHamletPSYOP.html

Moore, H., Galloway, J. (2004). We were soldiers once, and we were young. San Francisco: Presidio Press.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

U.S. Military Chain of Command the Traditional
Words: 1012 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

U.S. Military Chain of Command The traditional wars that have followed the Europeans models developed by Napoleon basically incorporate the leadership in writing and training troops for rules of engagement. Rules of Engagement (ROE) is described as a management tool that help in keeping soldiers within control and aligned with the specific mission. This management tool has contributed to benefits and costs in which training ROE in each leadership level down

Chain of Command
Words: 927 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Vietnam War has gone down in history as one of the worst war efforts made by the United States for its sheer cost in human capital and the collective sanity of the nation. While many social and psychological issues can be cited as bearing the blame for the atrocity that was this war, one major challenge was the basic lack of communication and consistency among the levels of command. Individual

Levels of the Chain of Command
Words: 853 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Chain of Command and ROE Levels of the Chain of Command The objective of this study is to discuss the views of the six levels in the chain of command from the perspective of each during the Vietnam War. The six levels of the chain of command includes: (1) the individual soldiers in the field; (2) battalion commanders; (3) division commanders; (4) General William Westmoreland; Secretary Of Defense Robert McNamara; and

Conventional Wars the Rules of Engagement Roe
Words: 1198 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Conventional Wars The rules of Engagement (ROE) used during war remains were established as recognition to the general or international law in the conduct of war, specifically the protection of civilian (International Institute of Humanitarian Law, 2007). Rules of Engagement are composed of procedures, power of decision and limitations which the military forces may employ to achieve goals and objectives during the conduct of war. It is issued by authorities in

American Rules of Engagement in the Vietnam War
Words: 752 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

rules of engagement established in the war against the Vietnamese by the United States of America. It highlights the way those who engaged in the war on the U.S. side perceived those restrictions starting from the top political leadership to the soldiers in the battlefield. The United States of America's war against Vietnam came at the height of divisive world politics. This was the reason that led to the institution

Vietnam and the Rules of Engagement
Words: 1306 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Paper

Vietnam -- Rules of Engagement There are many reasons given for the fact that the United States lost the war in Vietnam, and that America was basically pushed out of the country by the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese Army even though the U.S. had far more firepower. Among the more credible reasons America lost the war was the failure on the part of the political leaders back in Washington

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now