Fiscal Federalism
INTRODUCTION
Fiscal federalism is the relationship between different levels of government in a federation with respect to their spending and revenue-raising powers. The three key dimensions of fiscal federalism are vertical fiscal imbalances, horizontal fiscal equalization, and spending assignment.
The first use of the term fiscal federalism was by German-bornAmerican economist Richard Musgrave in 1959 (Kapucu, 2022). It was used to describe the relationship between the central government and the states. The term became more widely used in the United States during the Great Depression as a way to describe the relationship between the federal government and the states. Fiscal federalism is important because it affects how much money is spent on public goods and services, how that money is raised, and who ultimately benefits from those expenditures. One strength of fiscal federalism is that it allows for different levels of government to specialize in the provision of certain public goods and services (Oates, 1999). This can lead to more efficient and effective delivery of those services. Another strength of fiscal federalism is that it allows for a sharing of risks and resources across different levels of government. This can help to mitigate regional disparities and provide a safety net for vulnerable populations (Driessen & Hughes, 2020). One weakness of fiscal federalism is that it can lead to duplication of effort and confusion about who is responsible for what. Another weakness is that it can create incentives for governments to free ride on each others efforts, rather than working together cooperatively. Finally, fiscal federalism can create incentives for corruption, as individuals or groups seek to influence government decision-making in order to secure a larger share of resources.
This paper will analyze the theory of fiscal federalism, discuss the advantages and disadvantages of fiscal federalism to states with examples, and describe the advantages and disadvantages of fiscal federalism to local governments with examples. It will also incorporate a Bible-based perspective into this analysis and discussion.
ANALYSIS OF THEORY OF FISCAL FEDERALISM
As Driessen and Hughes (2020) point out, the field of fiscal federalism studies how to divide responsibilities (including finances) among federal, state, and local governments to improve economic efficiency and achieve various public policy objectives (p. 1). However, there is no one size fits all when it comes to the theory of fiscal federalism. Each country has its own unique set of political, economic, and social institutions which impact the way that fiscal federalism is practiced. In order to better understand the theory of fiscal federalism, it is necessary to first analyze the specific context in which it is being applied.
There are three main approaches to fiscal federalism: the centralization approach, the decentralization approach, and the mixed approach (Oates, 1999). The centralization approach calls for most tax and spending powers to be concentrated at the national level. The decentralization approach, on the other hand, favors a devolution of power to lower levels of government. The mixed approach seeks to find a balance between these two extremes.
Each approach has its own strengths and weaknesses. The centralization approach can lead to more efficient resource allocation and a stronger national government (Nechyba, 2003). However, it can also result in less accountability and more bureaucracy. The decentralization approach can promote competition and innovation, but it can also lead to duplication of effort and a race to the bottom in terms of taxes and spending. The mixed approach seeks to strike a balance between these two extremes, but it can be difficult to find the right mix of powers and responsibilities.
The theory of fiscal federalism is constantly evolving as countries experiment with different approaches. There is no one perfect solution that will work for all countries. Instead, each country must tailor its own unique solution based on its own specific needs and circumstances (Oates, 2005).
From a Bible-based perspective, it is important to point out what is said in Philippians 4:19: And my God will supply every need of yours according to his riches in glory in Christ Jesus. In Philippians 4:19, the apostle Paul reassures his readers that God will meet their every need. He does not say that God will provide all of their desires, but that he will supply what they need. This promise is based on God's riches in glory, which are far greater than anything we could ask or imagine. When we trust in God, we can be confident that he will provide for us, even in the midst of difficult circumstances. Paul himself experienced firsthand how God can turn our needs into blessings. While imprisoned for preaching the gospel, he was able to write letters that encouraged and strengthened other believers. As we place our trust...
…their spending to meet the needs of their citizens. Scripture teaches that the government is responsible for caring for the poor and oppressed (James 1:27; Isaiah 1:17). If the government only spends money on < style ='color:#000;text-decoration: underline!important;' id='custom' target='_blank' href='https://www.paperdue.com/topic/military-essays'>military and infrastructure, then it is not adequately meeting the needs of its citizens. Different levels of government need to be aware of the needs of their citizens and spend money accordingly. Otherwise, they are not fulfilling their biblical mandate.However, there are also disadvantages to fiscal federalism (Feld et al., 2004). One disadvantage is that it can lead to duplication of services. For example, if both the central government and state governments invest in healthcare, this can lead to duplicate hospitals and clinics in different parts of the country. From a biblical perspective, this duplication may be seen as a form of wastefulness. The Bible teaches that we are to be good stewards of the resources that God has given us, and wasting resources is contrary to His will. Therefore, it is important to consider the impact of duplication on both our economy and our relationship with God when evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of different levels of government having their own sources of revenue.
Another disadvantage is that it can create an imbalance in spending power between different levels of government. For example, if the central government has more money than the state governments, this can lead to the central government having more influence over how funds are spent.
CONCLUSION
Overall, the federal system also promotes competition between the states. The Constitution gives the states a great deal of autonomy, and they are free to experiment with different policies and approaches to governing. This competition can help to improve the overall quality of governance, as successful policies are adopted by other states and unsuccessful ones are abandoned. In addition, this competition encourages innovation and creativity, as states strive to find new ways to solve problems. Ultimately, the federal system creates an environment in which government officials are constantly seeking to improve their performance, making it one of the most effective forms of government in the world. There are advantages of course as well as disadvantages. Ultimately, any system is prone to corruption, which is why we must also choose to follow the wisdom and advice given in the Bible, for that is the source of true…
References
Athanasoulis, S. G., & Wincoop, E. V. (2001). Risk sharing within the United States:What do financial markets and fiscal federalism accomplish?. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(4), 688-698.
Driessen, G. A., & Hughes, J. S. (2020). Fiscal federalism: Theory and practice. Congressional Research Service.
Feld, L. P., Kirchgässner, G., & Schaltegger, C. A. (2004). Fiscal federalism andeconomic performance: evidence from Swiss cantons (No. 2004, 20). Marburger Volkswirtschaftliche Beiträge.
Kapucu, N. (2022). Fiscal federalism. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/fiscal-federalism
Nechyba, T. J. (2003). Centralization, fiscal federalism, and private school attendance. International Economic Review, 44(1), 179-204.
Oates, W. E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of economic literature, 37(3),1120-1149.
Oates, W. E. (2005). Toward a second-generation theory of fiscal federalism. International Tax and Public Finance, 12(4), 349-373.
Federalism is a political system where power is separated between one central and several different regional governments. The basic idea is to limit the size and influence of the government by dividing the roles / responsibilities of each entity. ("Federalism") Describe the importance of federalism to American public administration. In the case of the United States, federalism is a key in protecting the nation's civil liberties. This is because the power of
Between 1970 and 1997 contemporary federalism was developed characterized by a shift in intergovernmental system of grants. It also saw an increase in lack of funding of federal mandates and concern were raised on the federal regulations as well as the disputes that continued to occur over the federal system nature. United States adoption of federal system The United States was previously under a confederation. However, in the second constitution there
It is also essential for the emergency management program to be tested periodically to determine their capability of dealing with hazards. In order to warn other areas that are at risk and to obtain useful information for the future, damage assessment should take place as well (Turoff, 2004). Specifically, the jurisdiction should develop technology adequate enough for them to "collect, compile, report, receive, and transmit damage assessment information" (Turoff,
However, it is important to realize it only protected some individuals. White business owners had their property rights changed when they were forced to serve African-American patrons. Remembering that there is generally one group that loses some power when another group gains power is a good way to understand the arguments for and against federalism. In fact, the Civil Rights Movement marked a shift in how the U.S. Supreme Court
For example, we could consider a local agricultural project. The local and state expertise in determining what are the right decisions to be made on this project should be more useful and in a more timely manner than decisions that could be made at a federal level. In the current security and economic environment, the answer is probably somewhere mid-way between all the notions previously presented. From this perspective, a
However, post-Reconstruction, 'states rights' often became a code word for Jim Crow legislation. Southern states demanded the 'right' for the majority to engage in de facto segregation of schools and to institute limits upon how voting rights were exercised. Many Americans do not know that the Bill of Rights originally was only intended to govern the actions of the federal government, not the states. "The debate over whether the Fourteenth
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now