Capital Investment and Budget Planning
Capital and Investment Budget Planning
For all governments, long-term expenses are something they must deal with. This is to ensure that the continuing needs of an area are met through facilitating economic growth and addressing the demands of the general public. To fully understand this process requires examining the capital and investment budget planning process. This will be accomplished by comparing the city of Toronto's budget presentation with the 8 step method and carefully analyzing this model. Together, these elements will highlight how administrators are able to account for spending on large projects and ensure that there is enough funding to meet these needs every single year.
Part
Compare Toronto's capital budget presentation with the eight step model
For the most part, the city of Toronto is following the eight step model to highlight the long-term needs of the area between 2009 and 2018. Some of the different elements that are included in the proposal which are following the guidelines include: identifying current service characteristics, determining environmental trends, developing service objectives, creating a list of capital project / estimated costs, determining the available financial resources and selecting a subset of projects that will help with five years of planning. These different factors are ensuring that the city is able to improve its infrastructure, enhance its quality of life and create an environment. That is taking into account the needs of stakeholders. ("2009 to 2013 Recommended Capital Budget and Plan," 2008) ("Capital Assets," n.d.)
For example, inside the city's projected capital expenditures there is a focus on several different areas. The most notable include: public safety / emergency services, transit, public spacing, enhancing the quality of life inside the community / protecting the ecology and improving public services. Each of these areas is concentrating on how the city can fund these projects over the long-term in order to address the continuing needs of Toronto. ("2009 to 2013 Recommended...
Evidence of this can be seen in the 2009 to 2013 and 2009 to 2018 categories. In 2009 to 2013, these expenses are expected to be $10.87 million. The total funding for these projects is projected to come in at $10.86 million. The total expenditures for 2009 to 2018 are estimated to account for $17.34 million. While the revenues to support these initiatives, is expected to be $17.34 million. In these examples, the city is showing where the funding for the various projects will come from two different periods of time. This helps in their planning by demonstrating how needs of stakeholders is addressed over the long-term and the impact it is having on everyone. ("2009 to 2013 Recommended Capital Budget and Plan," 2008) ("Capital Assets," n.d.)
The obvious strengths of the capital budget for Toronto are through providing stakeholders with additional information. This is highlighting the long-term effects they will have on revenues and expenses that are received. However, there are two apparent weaknesses in the process. These include: the ability to determine the way these recurring costs will impact the city's budget and the fact that these figures were not provided in the first year. ("2009 to 2013 Recommended Capital Budget and Plan," 2008)
This is problematic, as the lack of numbers in these areas is not taking into account the needs of stakeholders. The way that this is occurring is to show transparency and where the funding will come from. Yet, actuaries are not providing any kind of insights as to how this could impact the city's budget from 2009 going forward. If the local economy were to go through a series of challenges, this could create a situation where there will be a budget shortfall from failing to take this into account these variables. ("2009 to 2013 Recommended Capital Budget and Plan," 2008) ("Capital Assets," n.d.)
Furthermore, the inability to include these figures makes it seem…
