Verified Document

Capital Budgeting Scenario Questions Essay

Finance This information will affect the opportunity cost of the decision, because the company will not have any access to the Chilean market. Well, more likely it will need to sue via the WTO over the policy, so it would eventually gain access to the Chilean market, but until that happens would be shut out. However, there are always opportunity costs associated with any decision. The decision as to whether or not the company should set up in Chile has to be made based on the merits of that decision alone. Making decisions based on speculation and worst-case hypotheticals, in particular when those are opportunity costs, is poor decision-making practice. Thus, this rumor about Matsubara should not have any influence on the decision with respect to setting up in Chile. The decision is still that setting up in Chile is expected to have a positive NPV, and should be undertaken.

Normally, it is advised that opportunity costs are included in an NPV calculation, but to do that the opportunity cost has to be legitimate, not hypothetical. Hypothetically, we could take the money not invested in Chile, go to Vegas, and win $100 million hypotheticals should only be included if they are...

In this situation, you are working with a rumor. But that rumor is tangential to the decision, because it has already been determined that we will not export to Chile. Thus, the choice remains either to set up operations in Chile, or not to set up operations in Chile. Exporting was never an option, so this hypothetical rumor (that runs counter to Chile's WTO commitments) does not affect the decision at hand.
2. This would have to be taken into consideration. Many countries have rules that govern cash outflows. It would be illegal, however, to mandate that capital retained in Chile must only be invested at 2%. You would reinvest it elsewhere in the Chilean economy. The entire point of such laws is to encourage retaining earnings in the host country.

But to take this absurd scenario at face value, 2% is a negative real return as Chilean inflation rates are in the 4.x range for 2015. This mandate would represent negative cash flow. That loss on investment must be included, because it is incremental to the decision, and is known. This cost would then have to be built into the analysis, and the recommendation might change.…

Sources used in this document:
But to take this absurd scenario at face value, 2% is a negative real return as Chilean inflation rates are in the 4.x range for 2015. This mandate would represent negative cash flow. That loss on investment must be included, because it is incremental to the decision, and is known. This cost would then have to be built into the analysis, and the recommendation might change. The recommendation is still a go, because the NPV is still positive, but it is just barely positive, given that the company is losing 2.5% or thereabouts as the difference between the inflation rate in Chile and the 2% return on those funds. If that pushes the discount rate up, it gets to 17.5%, versus an IRR of 17.75%, so the project is still profitable, but barely so.

3. This opportunity would not affect anything. I would not sell tin at a loss, so the offer to export tin means very little to me. Selling at 80% of purchase price is a loss of 20%, so basically I would be paying a 20% charge to get my money out of Chile.. That is more than the 2.5% hit I am taking to keep my money in Chile. While this may result in greater certainty with respect to the value of the profits, the cost is that the venture is no longer profitable. Moreover, the 15% discount rate is no longer sufficient, because the company is now exposed to commodity price risk, as it is impossible to hedge the price of tin five years out. The offer is just that, and I do not have to accept the offer. I would not accept an offer that wiped out my profits.

Thus, because this offer is worse than the one in #2, it would not affect anything. They are mutually exclusive offers, and I would take the best one, which is #2.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Capital Budgeting the Beta for
Words: 749 Length: 3 Document Type: Case Study

1 0.107 0.107 1.788005 4.37% 7.24% D 20 Lev 1.2925 0.120475 0.11038 1.653411 4.05% 7.22% D 50 Lev 1.87 0.1609 0.16045 -0.1731 -0.44% 7.05% 5. The only project that is unacceptable is Project D. At the 50% leverage level. This has a negative NPV. The other projects at each leverage level all have positive net present values. The following graph shows the NPVs for the different projects: 6. My objective in making this decision is to maximize firm value. The projects are mutually exclusive. I would use NPV as the main

Capital Budgeting Financial Analysis of a Mineral
Words: 758 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Capital Budgeting Financial Analysis of a Mineral Resources Opportunity on the North Ridge of Mt. Zircon Situation Overview Engineers working for Peru Resources have proposed a new mine on the North Ridge of Mt. Zircon. They have discovered a vein of transcendental zirconium ore that led them to believe that there was a sufficient amount to produce roughly 340 tons of this mineral per year for a seven-year period. Furthermore, it was believed

Capital Budgeting if the Project
Words: 558 Length: 2 Document Type: Research Proposal

Any discount rate lower will yield a positive net present value, up to $126,000. Part II. For capital budgeting decisions, NPV is a better metric. NPV and IRR are very similar in many respects, and they carry the same reliance on the same underlying assumptions about the underlying cash flows. Additionally, they both relate to the company's cost of capital. IRR is typically used as a go/no-go threshold, whereas NPV measures

Capital Budgeting Decision Leasing Vs.
Words: 1119 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Some people compare buying a car to renting an apartment: "you pay a monthly fee to use it but don't own it -- and aren't making payments toward ownership. The leased vehicle remains the property of the lessor -- the company that issued the lease" (Peters 2009). However, cars depreciate rather than appreciate in value, unlike real estate. Monthly lease payments are cheaper than payments on a new car,

Capital Budgeting Analysis Johnson &
Words: 4128 Length: 15 Document Type: Research Proposal

Approximately 19% of the short-term liabilities in the form of notes payable and other short-term debt. The long-term liabilities consist of long-term debt and other miscellaneous liabilities. The debt portion of this represents approximately 39% of the total long-term liabilities. Johnson & Johnson has issued notes onto the market that mature in 2017, comprising the bulk of the long-term debt. The calculate the market value capital structure of JNJ, we need

Capital Budgeting the Projected Free
Words: 2188 Length: 7 Document Type: Research Proposal

But even with no cost savings whatsoever, this project has a positive NPV. We can see, therefore, that the greatest area of sensitivity is with the terminal value. The terminal value at present is worth $143 million of the NPV. If we break down the variables that go into the terminal value, however, we notice that the cost savings are critical. If SGA expense is not reduced, then the terminal

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now