They always expect the court decisions to be consistent with the objectives on social and economic policies. However, in any given case, the Supreme Court is persistent as to the inherent uncertainty of any result. Although the public's opinion is correct, the Supreme Court has the right and duty to uphold its unbiased decision.
Another question that may arise is - "Is the Charter applicable only to Canadian citizens?" In reference to Quebec's Charter of Human Rights and Freedom, the Supreme Court implied that Section 7 is not limited to the citizens of Canada but is applicable to all persons who are physically present in the country. A person who is not a citizen of Canada may enjoy such protection of the law in a way that a Canadian citizen may benefit the same while on another country. This is because of the many treaties between countries regarding the governance of their citizens while in a foreign land. Of course, these rights are not intended to mean the same rights being enjoyed by citizens such as the right to vote and the right to run in government office. The right we are talking here is the right to due process of law. Again, although "due process" is not expressly stated in the Charter, it is meant to be the same as the fundamental justice.
As in the case of Mr. Manickavasagam Suresh, a number of petitions were received that he was deprived of his right of due process during the deportation review and he claimed that he was a victim of arbitrary detention. Because Suresh was not able to exercise his right to habeas corpus, the petitioner maintained that the Canadian government has failed to ensure the equal protection before the law. Despite these petitions, Suresh was deported back to Sri Lanka. Since Suresh was an alleged member a terrorist organization, Canada took into consideration the overall security as a precautionary measure.
As regards the rights to life, abortion takes an impediment position on cases where the
According to Justice Sopinca, in determining the principles of fundamental justice, the consideration is not just focused on the individual but on the state's interest. It is true that there must be a consensus in the society. In case there is a breach in the rights of life, liberty, and security of a person, a balance test is taken, weighing the importance of the individual as against the welfare of the majority. Therefore, if the breach of the said rights does not enhance the state's interest, then there is a breach of the fundamental justice.
Just like in any other countries, Canada's fundamental justice is confined with upholding the value of every person - his or her life, liberty and security. There may be conflicts that may arise in the exercise of particular rights as against the application of other existing laws, but, let us always keep in mind that the government has the obligation to ensure the overall security of Canadians. As reported by the Special Senate Committee on the Anti-terrorism Act, the government will protect the civil liberties as a basis of a democratic society -- be it an international or domestic law, all rights are of equal value.
When the human rights related to HIV / AIDS are not respected, the vulnerability of the infection and spread of HIV increases and effective response to the epidemic is impeded. It is important to integrate a human rights approach when dealing with HIV / AIDS because once there rights are protected and promoted, vulnerability reduces, response to the epidemic is enhanced, and discrimination against infected individuals is discouraged. References Boesten, J.
Cultural relativism contends that no one culture possesses a more correct value system than any other. "There is no one standard set of morals," Sullivan (2006) argues, which one can use as a base to: "objectively judge all cultures, so comparing morality between cultures -- which retain independent and distinct histories and influences -- is basically futile" (¶ 9). As the movement is rooted in the world community's response to
SWOT Analysis: Human Rights Campaign Human Rights Campaign (HRC) In brief, HRC "is the largest civil rights organization working to achieve equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Americans…" (HRC, 2014). As the organization further points out on its website, it currently has a global membership of more that 1.5 million people. In this text, I conduct SWOT analysis for HRC. In so doing, I will be taking into consideration the HRC's
Also, the death penalty still in use in a great deal of countries might provide another subject for debate from the point-of-view of human rights. A minimalist set of human rights, meant only to keep people safe from humiliation and pain cannot be effective. This is mainly because while certain human rights seem to be of little necessity, they are actually indispensable. Economic, civil, and political rights are of great
Right to Privacy Being a citizen of the United States comes with many benefits in comparison to citizenship in other countries. Through the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights we are granted certain rights -- the right to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, and freedom of assembly -- just to name a few. However, despite the 27 amendments the Bill of Rights that guarantee American protections
Some writers have also reverberated the dread that human security could become a philosophical tool. Does Respectable Conception it work? Altering Facets OF Human Safety. Founded on this apparently un fluctuating contrast of opinions produced by procedural insufficiencies and possible incoherency, there is other approaches that can be proposed. In an appreciation, to some it seems to have come full circle: there are important resemblances concerning the impression of human security
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now