California's Proposition 226 California's Proposition 226 California's Proposition 226

California's Proposition 226

California's Proposition 226

The California's Proposition 226 effectively addresses the workers' rights with respect to their autonomy and freedom in which they are empowered to decide for the utilization withholding taxes that are deducted from the employers and are provided to the unions which utilize the generated monetary funds based on their autocratic decisions and lack to provide transparency in their decisions.

Advantages of California Proposition 1

Disadvantages of California Proposition 1

The California Proposition 226 apprehends for the employers and labor organizations in which these entities are required to get the permit from their employees in order to charge any withholding amount, union dues and amount to be contributed in political activities. The proposition makes the employee permission in this respect with the utilization of a mandatory form which ensures the consent of employee and helps in the process of record keeping in database. In this way, the taxes and dues paid by employees are refrained to be used in political activities, government process and foreign affairs. The proposition is also known as the Political-Contributions by Employees, Union-Members and Foreign-Entities Statue and was constituted in June 1998. The proposition caused the formulization of payroll procedure in which the establishment of employees' consent for the utilization of their taxes took place (Ballotpedia, 1998).

The background of California Proposition encompasses that employers have been deducting a number of withholding taxes from the salaries and wages of their employees and these withholding taxes consists of dues to be paid for social security, the income taxes, medical insurance planning and donations in non-profit organizations. The amount that is collected from these taxes is utilized in several organizations, political parties, political activities, government, public developments and businesses. The large number of workers in California are associated with their respective labor unions. Even the workers who are not associated with any labor union with respect to their work also provide support to these unions in order to represent themselves as a large entity of employees and impact their employers with respect to their shared benefits of collective bargaining system (Wilson, 1998).

According to Ballotpedia (1998), the workers who are specified as the active members of the labor unions are obligated to pay a part of their wages or salaries to these unions. Usually this amount is charged by the organization or the employer entities from the payroll of employees and is paid directly to these unions and the amount consists of the cumulative collected amount from the employees. The amount received from unions in this respect is often utilized for the conduction of political activities. The members of the union may demand for the prohibition of the deducted amount to be used for the political activities but the union possess the right to neglect such demand. However, if the appeal is made from the non-union members then the union has to respond towards the appeal and discontinue the utilization of deducted money for the political purposes.

The contribution made by the employees is forbidden to be used for the foreign entities, foreign political parties and foreign businesses and in the same way, the workers who are not the U.S. nationals are refrained from making any kind of contributions in these labor union deductions which are utilized for the political activities. The Californian voters were asked to support the notion that if they want their paid dues that are eventually a condition in their employment, it should be used for the political activities. Thus the consent of employees is required because the support of unions for the activities conducted by the political parties often addresses the statements that employees do not even understand. Therefore, the acts of these employees are stonewalled and manipulated by the unions due to the influence of unions on their members and the members then tend to follow the decisions made by the union leaders rather than making their decisions based on their personal autonomy. It has been observed that unions in California collectively spend the 81 million dollars that are gathered from the deduction of wages from the employees and workers and the amount is considered to be used for the political purposes that specifically support the cycle of two-year elections (Smart Voter, 1998).

Advantages of California Proposition

According to Wilson (1998), the members of the unions were given the right for the effective utilization of the hard earned money with respect to their beliefs and the personal...

The members were given the right to refrain the utilization of their money from the purposes that they think are objectionable and support only those activities that effectively address the interest of the union members. The billions of dollars earned by these workers were used by the organized union leaders to promote the political objectives that are not considered to be connected with the labor related objectives and workplace concerns. Hence, the misuse of the amount earned by the employees was taking place and the proposition of California addressed this notion effectively. The workers usually tend to pay the union dues without questioning the utilization of their paid dues and even if they asked about the utilization of their money, they were not appreciated and answered justifiably by the union leaders.
The implementation of the proposition will eradicate the foreign influence in the political activities because the foreigners will be banned to make any contributions in the union and thus, the foreign money will not be able to buy the political influence in the state. As a result, the election of corrupted officers will be neglected and hence, better developmental policies will be implemented in the state with effective means of elections and the national candidates. According to the California Secretary of State (1998), the leaders of the unions tend to make decisions in order to support the political parties regardless of the members' opinion. It is strongly believed that leaders imply these decisions because they propagate that they know better and the direction that they are following leads to the better employee benefits and workplace environment and their decisions are able to address the concerns that are highly related to the well-being of members. However, the stated notion is not justified by these leaders and the collected amount is usually used for the political activities and purposes that either do not provide long-term benefits to the employees or do not address the employees' concerns at all.

The workers in organizations who are also the respected citizens of the state are usually deprived from their right of autonomy and tend to pay part of their wages for the benefit of their society and workplace but their consent is not considered to be adequate enough in order to give weightage to their consent. Moreover, the transparency between the traditional payroll deduction and contribution procedure is not maintained and thus, the employees do not understand and possess the knowledge about the contribution that they are making in the society. This eventually deprives the basic law of freedom and autonomy that every individual possesses regardless of his working level and social status. Therefore, the implementation of the proposition will make the employees independent with respect to their decisions and will provide them with the transparency about the utilization of their money in the developmental, social and political activities in the state (LWV, 1998).

The political organizations and non-profit organizations will have to prove their effectiveness and efficiency in their related fields in order to prove that they are worthy of the monetary supported that has provided them from the contribution of workers' earned wages and thus, these organizations will have to work on a competitive basis in order to gain the trust with respect to their beneficial objectives that they tend to provide to the individuals of the society. Therefore, the services and the developmental activities in the state will be increased resulting in the overall and long-term benefits for the well-being of individuals (Wilson, 1998).

Disadvantages of California Proposition

According to LAO (1998), the implementation of the proposition would increase the administration cost of the payroll departments in the organization due to the increased autonomy of employees for the effective utilization of their earned wages. In this way, the employers will have to facilitate the large number of employees with respect to their consent and thus, the administration cost of finance and payroll departments will increase abruptly. It was estimated by the Office of the State Controller that the administrative cost will rise by 2 million dollars per year and the implementation of the process will cost from 2 to 5 million dollars. Whereas, the current deduction and utilization of employees' wages are not comprehending any cost to the administrative departments and the implementation of the proposition will increase the administrative liability on the payroll departments.

The beneficial interests of the NGOs and non-profit organizations will be compromised due to the autonomy of employees. As well as the amount that is provided to these organizations that are contributing in…