The discounted payback for each project is also in the fifth year, but further along in the fifth year for Project a compared to the simple payback.
The net present value of Project a is $18,269. The net present value for Project B. is $18,690. The IRR for Project a is 18%, and the IRR for Project B. is 15%. (see Appendix B)
The cause of the ranking conflict would be that the cash flows for Project B. are weighted towards the fifth year, whereas the flows for Project a are spread more evenly throughout the project's life. The ability to re-invest the earlier flows from Project a allows that project to have a higher IRR despite having a lower NPV.
The project that should be selected is Project B. This project has the higher net present value, and that should be the criteria for determining between two mutually exclusive projects. It is reasonable to assume that because this project's flows all come in the fifth year that it is a riskier project (the IRR supports this contention), but if that is the case, the discount rate should be higher for that project. Using the same discount rate implies that the risk for each project's cash flows is equivalent.
Appendix a: Net Present Value Calculation
Units Sold
70,000
120,000
140,000
80,000
60,000
Price
Year
0
1
2
3
4
5
Cost
-7900000
Installation
-100000
Revenue
21
36
42
24
15600000
VC
-12600000
-21600000
-25200000
-14400000
-10800000
Fixed Costs
-200000
-200000
-200000
-200000
WC
-100000
-2100000
-3600000
-4200000
-2400000
-1560000
WC End
13960000
Tax Benefit
537200
537200
537200
537200
537200
Cash Flows
-8100000
6637200
11137200
12937200
7537200
17537200
PV
-8100000
5771478
8421323
8506419
4309419
8719088
NPV
$27,627,727
Depreciation
1580000
1580000
1580000
1580000
1580000
Tax Benefit
537200
537200
537200
537200
537200
Discount
0.15
Appendix B
Project a
Year
0
1
2
3
4
5
Cash Flows
-100,000
32,000
32,000
32,000
32,000
32,000
PV
-100,000
28,829
25,972
23,398
21,079
18,990
NPV
18,269
IRR
18%
Project B
Cash Flows
-100,000
0
0
0
0
200000
PV
-100,000
0
0
0
0
118690.27
NPV
18,690
IRR
15%
d
Caledonia Products a) When making capital budgeting decisions, Caledonia should focus on cash flows rather than accounting profits. The argument in favor of cash flows is simple -- cash flows are what drive company value, more so than economic profit. Profit can be distorted by a number of considerations that do not impact on cash flows. For example, depreciation expense is not a cash flow, but a means of accounting for
Caledonia focus on project free cash flows as opposed to the accounting profits earned by the project when analyzing whether to undertake the project? After studying the Caledonia case I came to the conclusion that the reason that Caledonia should focus on free cash flows is because the cash flows are where the firm receives and is able to reinvest. Also the firm is only interested in the free cash
Piper Alpha Disaster An Environmental and Safety Management Analysis of the Disaster that Occurred on the Piper Alpha Oil Rig off the Coast of Scotland Piper Alpha (Seconds from Disaster, 2013) The Incident The Piper before the Explosion Timeline of Events Piper Alpha Mechanism Root Causes of the Analysis Human Factors Design and Process Factor Financial Consequences Permit to Work System Safety Training Fire Walls Temporary Refuge Evacuation and Escape The Incident Piper Alpha was a North Sea oil production platform operated by Occidental Petroleum (Caledonia) Ltd.
This will also show the degree to which the project is vulnerable to potential changes on the market that would influence its main figures, including the volume of sales. Another useful tool that can be used is a simulation. A simulation would allows us, in this particular analysis, to change some of the variables in a mathematical model that we would create and analyze the consequences of those changes. The
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now