Business Leadership in Relation to Rhetoric Leadership and Rhetoric

Leadership is a trait that is neither completely naturally inherited, nor completely learned. But it is actually a blend of inherited characteristics/traits and the skills cultured from individuals throughout their lifetimes. This is exactly what Pericles had. He possessed an inherent set of leadership traits as well as a voice that persuaded and converted an entire empire to great heights of success and prosperity.

Leadership is a trait that is somewhat naturally inherited within individuals while strategically polished afterwards. Leaders rise not merely through the blessings of natural inheritance but require equal attention towards flourish and sequential development. While searching for a definition, one's mind comes up with a usual set of traits that constitute to leadership, but in cases when one experiences leadership the definition becomes compliant to the characteristics observed in the meantime. Leadership is often confused with management although both are different to some extent. The phenomenal role of leadership is obvious since the beginning of time. Immaculate leaderships have emerged out of the great historic happenings. Leadership may relate to an individual, a company, an organization or a nation as a whole and the attributes differ likewise (David I. Bertocc, 2009). Thus, there is no certain point or the extent to which a universal definition could be assigned to leadership. Microsoft represents leadership in the computer technology while Gandhi represents political leadership. What the scenario reflects is that the concept of leadership has varied from the beginning and has been consistent in doing so till the present times. Therefore, it would not be wrong to anticipate a similar behavior of leadership in the years to come.

Confusions in understanding the true meaning of leadership arise when the term is mixed with authority, power and related terms. People tend to define the concept of leadership according to their personal thoughts. Leadership, in other words, depends upon the person who is defining the term (Yukl, 2006). A careful analysis of the various definitions of leadership derives the assumptions that it is the behavior of an individual directed towards making people related to the organization pursues a common cause.

Leadership is an inspirational set of traits that possesses the capability to bring a change in the organization and its members (Alan Bryman, 2013).

The Process of Leadership

Based on the aforementioned discussion a leadership process comprises of a sequence of four stages (David I. Bertocc, 2009). These stages include

Devising a strategic vision

Communicating the vision to the members of the organization

Construct a relationship of trust between the organizational members and stakeholders through effective utilization of technical and personal expertise

Becoming a role through empowerment and inspiration

Leadership vs. Management

Leadership depends upon the situation and grounds to which the concept is being implied. Leadership in terms of organizations is a diverse field. It is a completely different paradigm from management, although it is being mostly confused. Leaders are not the managers of an organization but the individuals who are capable of identifying the bigger picture of things and who make sense out of events. An organization might have placed a leader to a specified department who performs outstandingly well, but that individual does not have the ability to handle situations other than his/her designated position. Therefore it is more apposite to refer to such individuals as managers and not the leaders. A leader is the one who possesses the skill of know the gravity of the situation and making logical interpretations. he/she puts these interpretations to use by making decisions keeping in view the bigger picture of things irrespective of the petty issues. Leadership is when the members of the organization do not concentrate on a specified target rather made to believe they are working for the same cause (David I. Bertocc, 2009). Difference between a leader and a manager is the fact that managers are usually reactive to certain situations while leaders are active (John Storey,2004). Leaders create new situations and ideas rather than waiting for events to occur and respond accordingly. Despite being one of the four principles of management, leadership is actually an entirely different area. It is clear that one can be a successful manager without being a leader and vice versa (Yukl, 2006). Managers usually lack the basic skills that are necessary to become good leaders (Montgomery Van Wart, 2012)

Leadership and its Effectiveness

The effectiveness of leadership cannot be measured numerically however; there are particular indicators recognized by various researchers that could help in identifying the extent to which leadership is effective. A common denominator is the consequence or the outcome of a leader's action or decision. This could help in determining if the organization has a good or bad...

Secondly, individual attitudes and behaviors towards the leader also facilitates to a set limit in knowing the effectiveness of leadership that follows. Moreover, the success of the group lying under the leader's guidance and supervision also gives an insight of the leadership effectiveness and usefulness. Achievement of organizational goals accompanied with high quality is what indicates a good leadership.
The aforementioned indicators can lend a hand in recognizing the effectiveness and fruitfulness of an organization when carefully combined on the basis of relevance.

The leadership effectiveness can be segmented into three determinants including groups, individuals and organization (Robert N. Lussier, Christopher F. Achua, 2009).

The Trait Theory of Leadership

The standards for leadership are improved on a frequent basis however; studies suggest that there are particular identifiable traits that are shared by leaders. Some of these traits as identified by the retrospect are as follow

1. Originality

2. Personal Integrity

3. Alertness

4. Energy Level

5. Tolerance for Stress

6. Emotional Maturity

7. Self-confidence

Social scientists like Gibson and Donnelly have made considerable contributions towards the trait theory of leadership through their respective studies. Their studies have uncovered influential knowledge about leadership and tested the conformity of the aforementioned traits by comparing and contrasting various organizational leaders and their respective characteristics (David I. Bertocc, 2009).

Furthermore, studies have also brought into attention a valid point that the extent to which these respective leadership traits can work depends upon the levels of authority that the leaders have.

The Behavioral Leadership Theory

This theory concentrates more towards the actions and tasks carried out by the leaders within an organization. Studies have been conducted in order to compare the different behaviors of successful leaders and with ineffective leaders. According to this theory the different roles played by a leader depends upon the nature and level of authority that rests under their umbrella. The different leadership styles vary from person to person and organization to organization, but it is impossible to determine a standard style for leadership behaviors (Robert N. Lussier, Christopher F. Achua, 2009).

Behavioral Factors Influencing Leadership

To be a leader one must possess the ability to make sense out of the big picture. This means that a leader must be able to evaluate and interpret the "SWOT" strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats that lie in the way of achieving organizational goals. The leader must have a clear vision and the ability to devise an appropriate organizational mission. For leadership, it is important to be capable of bringing change within the organization as required by the circumstances. Organizational culture once developed is very hard to be altered. Hence to be able to formulate a change in such cultures is a significant attribute of leadership. The ability to deliver change can be attained by a synergy in support, communication, inspiration and energizing of the people (Jaap J. Boonstra, 2012).

Above all, a leader must always be ready to face and overcome any challenges that come in the way. he/she must have the capability to make people realize their own potential (Ann A. Cooper, 2001)

The Contingency Theory of Leadership

This theory was formulated when the search for the perfect leadership style concluded as an unfinished project. Theorists suggest that formulating a specified leadership style is not suitable as different situations demand for different leadership attributes. Hence they devised the contingency theory of leadership according to which the situations and the people involved are the determinants of leadership. More precisely stating, the choice of correct leadership style depends upon certain situations, leaders involved and scenarios that are being encountered by the organization (Robert N. Lussier, Christopher F. Achua, 2009). One leadership cannot fit in all types of organizations at all times (Nitin Nohria, Rakesh Khurana, 2010). The contingency theory serves the cause to determine the variables involved in organizational effectiveness from the two major perspectives of Leadership and Organization (Patti L. Chance, Edward W. Chance, 2002)

Power-Influence Approach in Leadership

This approach in leadership refers to the relationship between the power and its influence upon the people (Yuki, 2006) and (David William Prafka, 2009). According to this approach the influence of power is elaborated by the actions taken by the leader and the reactions demonstrated by the followers. It tends to describe the extent of power and measure the intensity of influence that the power is capable of creating (S. Alexander Haslam, Stephen D. Reicher, Michael J. Platow, 2011). This approach is significantly a difference between power and authority and the influence…