Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka In Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) the United States Supreme Court upheld racial segregation of passengers in railroad coaches as required by Louisiana law. Three years later the Supreme Court was asked to review its first school case dealing with equal treatment of school children. In Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education (1899) the court found that the temporary cessation of services for minority high-school children did not violate equal protection even though services continued at the high-school for Caucasian children. The Court reasoned that the closing of the school was based on economic considerations, and was not found to represent bad faith or an abuse of discretion. The court concluded that although all must share the burdens and receive the benefits of taxation, school finance was a matter belonging to the states and federal interference without a clear and unmistakable disregard for constitutional rights would be inappropriate (Cambron-McCabe, McCarthy, and Thomas).

Brown v. Board of Education began in 1951 when Linda Brown's father, Oliver, and thirteen other parents tried to enroll their children in the local white schools in the summer of 1950 but were turned down because they were African-Americans and told they must attend one of the four schools in the city for African-American children. At the time of the lawsuit there was a disparity in the resources allotted to the schools in the city; for every $150 dollars spent on students in white school only $50 dollars were spent on black pupils. Furthermore, there was a disparity in access to the most current textbooks, not enough school supplies and overcrowding in the schools provided for African-Americans.

Subsequent to the children being refused admittance to the white schools the parents went to the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) for help. The NAACP hired lawyers to represent the families in court, however, the state court upheld the District's right to...

Ferguson. After losing this case the lawyers for the NAACP decided to appeal to the United States Supreme Court which began hearing arguments on December 9, 1952 ("Brown v. Board of Education").
Brown v. Board of Education

In 1954 the Supreme Court combined cases from four states, Kansas, South Carolina, Virginia, and Delaware, to consider the separate but equal standard once again. These cases were Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Briggs v. Elliot, Davis v. Board of Education of Prince Edward County (VA.), Boiling v. Sharpe, and Gebhart v. Ethel. Though these cases differed regarding conditions and facts, each case involved minority children seeking assistance from the court under the Fourteenth Amendment to obtain entrance into public schools on a non-segregated basis (Cambron-McCabe, McCarthy, and Thomas).

Thurgood Marshall and the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund handled these cases. Marshall personally argued the case before the Court. Although he raised a variety of legal issues on appeal, the most common one was that separate school systems for blacks and whites were inherently unequal, and thus, violate the "equal protection clause" of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Furthermore, relying on sociological tests, such as the one performed by social scientist Kenneth Clark, and other data, he also argued that segregated school systems had a tendency to make black children feel inferior to white children, and thus, such a system should not be legally permissible ("Brown v. Board of Education - 1954,1955").

When the Justices met to decide the case they realized that they were deeply divided over the issues raised. While most wanted to reverse Plessy v. Ferguson, and declare segregation in public schools to be unconstitutional, they differed as to their reasons for doing so. Unable to come to a solution by the end of the Court's 1952-1953 term in June, the Court decided to rehear the case in December 1953. During the intervening months Chief Justice Fred Vinson died and was replaced by Gov. Earl Warren of California. After the case was reheard in 1953, Chief Justice Warren was able to do something that his predecessor had not; bring all of the…