Brain Differences in Boys and Girls
The obvious biological differences between men and women have inspired a search for corresponding mental differences. Indeed, much of the oppression suffered by women in the traditionally patriarchal world of business and society has been blamed on the preconceived notion that women were somehow not as good as men in certain areas. The rise of feminism negated all such difference. However, recent research has brought to light new information regarding biological differences in the brains of girls and boys.
New research into brain differences has been ongoing since the 1960s (Gabriel 2001). The finding that the preoptic area within the hypothalamus was larger in males than in females resulted in more research and discoveries of this kind. These have also been made easier by means of advanced imaging technology (Gabriel 2001).
One such study has been conducted in 1999 by Dr. Gabrielle de Courten-Myers of the University of Cincinnati Medical Center (Gabriel 2001). The neurologist found a larger number of neurons in the cerebral cortex of men, while women have more neuropil, which facilitates cell-to-cell communication.
It thus appears a given that biological differences exist in the brains of girls and boys. However, the true effect of these differences on behavior appears to be the issue of current debate. Thus, while the data for physical differences in the brains of girls and boys appear to be substantiated by means of various tests, the effect of these on behavior is another matter altogether. While some still hold that there are no differences between the brains of boys and girls, the focus of debate is gradually shifting. The issue has become not whether there are differences at all - indeed, science appears to have substantiated this. Instead the problem is whether such differences should be given substantial weight in social structures such as education. Dr. De Courten-Myers for example holds that there must be differences in brain function for boys and girls, but she does admit that the precise nature of the connection between morphology and function is difficult to determine (Gabriel 2001).
Experimental observation also indicates the marked differences that exist between boys and girls (Palar 1996). Boys appear to naturally be more robust, energetic and noisy than girls. A study was thus conducted by the West Des Moines School District in order to determine the best course of action to meet the needs of each gender.
Palar cites a 1992 AAUW report, claiming that boys and girls enter schools with roughly the same abilities. However, the report takes the side of social influence with the claim that, because boys receive more positive attention than girls in the classroom, girls become less able to deal with technical subject matter and are placed at a disadvantage once they leave school. It therefore appears that boys and girls do not necessarily learn differently, but are handled differently in the classroom, thus influencing their eventual ability.
The same article however states that, while girl's lack of confidence is the reason for her poorer academic performance in Middle School, the prejudiced punishment of boys is the reason for the same phenomenon for males. Boys, claim studies cited by Palar, are more likely to be punished than girls, and thus attach a negative connotation to academic work. The result is frequent drop-outs and poor grades. These are cited as good reasons for separating boys and girls during education, so each can receive the attention they need. However, an alternative is suggested. Rather than separating boys and girls entirely, teachers are educated with regard to gender differences, and how these can be used to the advantage of all learners.
Thus, it should be acknowledged that in the interest of a well-balanced education, neither boys nor girls should be isolated from the…
Boys and Girls Learn Differently! -- Michael Gurian and Patricia Henley Michael Gurian's book has been a best seller and a much-discussed, respected handbook on the topic of boys vs. girls in a learning milieu since it was published in 2001. But more than its popularity and success in the market, Gurian's book has made a positive impact on parents, teachers, counselors and others interested in education and human development because
(p. 88) Boys and girls also respond differently to stress, threat and confrontation, as girls are more likely to shy away from confrontation while boys seem to at times be motivated by it. (p. 88-89) Lastly, one of the most important issues of gender differences that effect education is in relation to social interactive differences, boys feel less of a need to connect with others in a social way
statistics showing that English boys are performing worse than their oversees counterparts. Then I list some of the possible reasons boys are falling behind and some of the solutions. I end with what I feel is a viable solution to the problem of boys falling behind. Are boys in England falling behind there female counterparts? If the answer to this question is yes, then why, and what can be done
Behavior and Bias in Access Two-thirds of all students receiving special education in the United States are boys and gender-based behavioral differences and gender bias are behind it (Rousso, 2003). Girls need to show more significant levels of disability than boys to receive service. When they do, they are assigned to more restrictive educational environments than boys. All available data show that women and girls with disabilities do not do as
Gurian does not suggest that girls should not be allowed to engage in such activities, only that the learning environment be balanced to enhance the weaknesses of both sexes, as well as build upon what he sees as their innate strengths. Gurian further cautions educators that some behavior difficulties may be the product of the current social environment of expectations, rather than a reflection that such disorders have increased, as
When the authors reviewed brain imaging scans and related data from the realm of neurobiology, they determined that there are no characteristic differences in brain anatomy as between male and female infants and that any differences that are observable later in life are the product of external influence, such as encouragement to engage in certain types of play and social interactions. The authors, (one of whom is a neurologist) demonstrate
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now