However, the fact that the OSHA continued to overlook what was taking place, meant that they would allow an unsafe work environment to exist. (Blumenthal, 2007) This is important, because it shows how the lack of follow up and the ability to enforce existing environmental / work safety laws, would help to make the situation worse at the Texas City refinery.
After the accident occurred, the CAB would investigate all of the various reports that were received from employees and their families about conditions at the facility. This was in contradiction with the investigation undertaken by BP, which found that employee error was the cause of the accident (not a lack of safety procedures). The results of the investigation by the CAB; would identify significant lapses in the lack of: oversight from OSHA and the cost cutting strategy that BP was utilizing. (Blumenthal, 2007) This is important, because the findings from the investigation would force the industry to reexamine various safety procedures. At the same time, it would push BP to pay $1 billion in making the necessary upgrades to the Texas City facility.
The Barriers that Prevented the Strategic Plan from being Implemented
The barriers that prevented the Strategic Plan from being implemented were: the culture of BP itself. The cost cutting atmosphere of the company would cause the infrastructure at many of their facilities to fall into a state of disrepair. This is problematic, because the lack of investment into new technology and safety equipment; meant that various refineries would become more difficult to operate. As the continued maintenance of key systems will become more expensive (which reduces the amount capital used to maintain them)? At which point, the chances increase that various fail safe measures will not work and different safety procedures will be overlooked. In the case of the Texas City refinery, this would make the situation more dangerous as the lack of investment from the previous owner, would leave the facility in need major infrastructure repairs. Once BP began cutting costs, is when key staff members and various procedures would be eliminated in an effort...
BP and how it can impact on the performanve of the firm In the recent times, a number of people have opposed the strategies that have been developed by BP. The major strategies that have been opposed by individuals is that of stoping the case regarding oil spill in the gulf of mexico.Operational strategy and effectiveness are vital for superior performance which is usually the main aim of all enterprises
Evidence of this can be seen with the company being slow to provide information, on the total amounts of oil that are leaking into the ocean and the various restrictions that they have placed on media coverage. (Lack of Transparency Afflicts Oil Spill Response 2010) This problematic, because when there are restrictions and the company is slow to release information, it appears as if they have something to hide.
Nowadays, the idea that offshore drilling is safe seems ridiculous. The Gulf spill nowhere compares to drilling disasters that have occurred before including one off the coast of Santa Barbara, Calif. In 1969 that discarded three million gallons into coastal waters and led to the present moratorium. The Deepwater Horizon calamity is a standard low probability, high impact event. It is the kind that has been seen more and more
Engineering Ethics This post-mortem report is directed to the British Petroleum (BP) board of directors concerning the BP Texas City refinery explosion incident that took place on March 23, 2005. A series of explosions occurred during the restarting of the hydrocarbon isomerization unit in the Texas City refinery. The main technical reason behind the initial explosion was the flooding of the over-pressurized distillation column, which ended up in a geyser of
British Petroleum Workshop Agenda ATOM Process Analysis and Procedure Recommendation New Procedures to Stanch Risks Brainstorming will follow the ATOM Process to formulate solutions to increase safety and better manage risks. Justification for Agenda -- the three risk factors were identified in all of the reports. Therefore, they will drive the Brainstorming session. The session will center around these issues, their resolution and then how to introduce a safety conscious regime. The Likert scale scores
The main hazards related to LNG include: Rupture due to Corrosion Rupture while excavation Rupture while excavation Rupture during an earthquake Rupture due to mechanical failure Rupture at compressor Rupture at inspection stations Uncontrolled detonation of explosives Blow-out of gas at head and subsequent fire Gas leak from infrastructure Fire involving combustible Construction damage LPG or Diesel Diesel pump fire involving equipment brittle fracture valve Leaks Welding failure welding casting failure Mechanical overstressing of equipment Vibration pump Corrosion joint Erosion Failure due to external loading or impact Internal Explosion Underground pipe
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now