However, that does not constitute an ethical orientation. Carr perceives that certain acts of deception may be rationalized by the business context, referring at multiple points to business as a game possessing its own unique set of rules. In order to function effectively within the context of this game, individuals that have a firmer grasp on such unspoken rules are likely to experience greater success. It is in this regard that the author compares business to the game of poker, in which players who succeed by balancing honesty with opportune acts of deception are not viewed as behaving immorally. Instead, it is understood that this is what is required in order to emerge as victorious. There is a set expectation amongst individuals with an understanding of the game that they will face such deception at points, and that the degree to which this can be detected will have a significant bearing on one's success. To Carr's view, this demonstrates that where contextual norms allow, ethicality can take on proportions distinct from...
Recent history denotes that the perception of entitlement toward deception amongst those who have achieved great heights of business success has promoted the type of rampant 'bluffing' that robs workers of their jobs, investors of the fortunes and everyday citizens of their pension plans. When the consequences of bluffing are thus, the comparison to the game of poker is particularly troubling. Where those who sit at the table recognize the stakes of that into which they have entered, the business world impacts far too many individuals who are involuntarily pulled into the game.
Employees are being rewarded for their honesty, and managers continue to encourage communication between supervisors and subordinates. Management is also looking for ways to encourage employees to tell the truth about other employees who may be involved in something dishonest or illegal (Jones, 1982). Not all employees will take advantage of this, of course, because some still believe that they will face punishment for being a 'whistle-blower', but there
Ethics The employee is faced with ethical requirements throughout their workday that must be met with knowledge and a trained attitude. Workplace ethics is one of the most crucial elements whether the person involved in an ethical dilemma is a high-level manager or an entry-level employee. An ethical stance is important because it is what guides the interactions that the employees will have with each other, their management, and the customers
Capitalism does force us sometimes to make decisions in a context narrower than we need in order to make them morally, socially, environmentally (Rolston, 1988, p. 324). Rolston points to several cases of corporate myopia that was changed as customers and potential customers made their views known and demonstrated that hurting customers would harm shareholders as well. He points to the DDT scare in the early 1960s which led to
, Alder, G., & Phelan, S. (2009). Competitive bluffing: An examination of a common practice and its relationship with performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(4), 535- 553. Retrieved October 20, 2009, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 1786751071). This article examines the strategic use of bluffing and concludes that its value is often overrated, given it quickly diminishes in utility. The authors used a simulated competitive market game to prove their thesis, however
The published codes of ethics for different professions try to make it clear that "professional" in that occupation will not misuse that power, and especially that the use will not be made for personal gain. Of course, in totality, the codes of ethics should provide guidance about the values to be upheld in the profession, specific ethical principles and specific standards. (Professional code of Ethics) Since there is a wide
Realm of Legal Negotiation DISTRIBUTIVE VS. INTEGRATIVE Negotiation involves a dialogue of two or more parties or people with the intention to reach a favorable outcome. This favorable result can be for just one party or both parties involved. The integrative approach to negotiation tries to expand the "pie" to make sure everyone gets something. However, the distributive approach ensures one side "wins" and the other, "loses." The legal landscape of
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now