Verified Document

Biblical Law Other (not Listed Above)

¶ … Bible and criminal procedures It is gratifying to read the Bible's teachings on matters pertaining to the criminal justice system such as witnesses given the parallels they have with our own contemporary notions of fair and just actions. The Bible counsels that it is not enough to have a single witness to condemn an individual; in the United States, although there is not a formal requirement of a specific number of witnesses during a trial unlike the Bible, there is growing awareness that eyewitness testimony can be biased and in general the prosecutor must bring forth a variety of evidence to warrant a conviction before a jury. The Bible also mandates the need for cross-examination and the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution specifically gives all defendants the right to confront their accusers. The Bible also punishes false witnesses and in the U.S. perjury is a crime. Perjury is not specifically punished by the punishment of the accused being meted out against the accuser as it is in the Bible, but it is still a serious crime.

The laws about physical evidence in the Bible specifically pertain to matters that are of less concern to individuals...

However, they still suggest the principle of the need for physical evidence vs. hearsay to convict an individual of a crime. Hearsay is: "Broadly, an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of whatever it asserts. Hearsay evidence is often inadmissible at trial" ("Hearsay," 2014). The Bible and current U.S. law thus both reflect the idea that human beings are fallible and multiple sources and types of evidence should ideally be consulted to bring about a conviction. Only God is omniscient, human beings are not, and one cannot convict assuming that a single voice or perspective is all-knowing and unbiased like the divine.
It should also be noted that in regards to all of these matters the Bible stresses the need for good people, infused with the spirit, to enforce the law: simply adhering to the letter of the law is not enough. As the Apostle Paul wrote: "Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us, for it is written: 'Cursed is everyone who is hung on a pole.' He redeemed us in order that the blessing given to Abraham might come to the Gentiles through Christ…

Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Eyewitness Testimony the Supreme Court, in Neil
Words: 607 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Eyewitness Testimony The Supreme Court, in Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 93 S. Ct. 375 (1972), set out some guidelines as to what a court must consider when it is trying to determine how much credibility to give to eyewitness testimony. This case involved a woman who identified a man who she claimed had raped her. The case revolved around the credibility of her identification. The Court laid out the

Eyewitness Testimony, Etc. In a
Words: 3711 Length: 12 Document Type: Term Paper

41+). Loftus notes that science has found "post-event information" is integrated into what most people have actually experienced because, "when people experience some actual event -- say a crime or an accident -- they often later acquire new information about the event. This new information can contaminate the memory" (Loftus, 2002, March, p. 41+). In addition, many false memories are created, deliberately or by accident, in response to leading questioning

Eyewitness Testimony Current Event in Criminal Justice
Words: 667 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Eyewitness Testimony Current Event in Criminal Justice The Reliability of Eyewitness Testimony The execution of Troy Anthony Davis on September 27, 2011, in Georgia has stirred new debate over the reliability of eyewitness testimony. Davis was convicted of the August 19, 1989 murder of police officer Mark MacPhail in Savannah, Georgia. Working a security guard at a Burger King, MacPhail was shot when he attempted to defend a man being assaulted in a

Eyewitness Testimony Problems One of
Words: 1623 Length: 5 Document Type: Essay

Thus while an interviewer may simply be trying to pin down additional details of an incident (for example), the eyewitness may believe that she or he is being challenged about the accuracy of his or her memory and statement and begin (again, most likely unconsciously and not in any attempt to commit perjury) to shift answers to coincide with what the witness believes the interviewer want to hear (Poole

Eyewitness Testimony and Memory Issues When Investigating
Words: 1114 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

Eyewitness Testimony and Memory Issues When investigating and prosecuting crimes and other incidents, their can be a heavy level of reliance on eyewitness testimony to substantiate the facts that are suggested by other evidence and to fill in missing gaps in the story of the crime, accident, or other incident. This can be a problem, however, as two different eyewitness accounts of the same incident are likely to differ significantly

Wrongful Convictions and Eyewitness Testimony
Words: 674 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Law enforcement has a direct ethical responsibility to preventing wrongful convictions, no matter how heavy the pressure for a conviction may be from a political standpoint. Wrongful convictions represent a miscarriage of justice and draw attention to procedural problems in law enforcement. One of the problems that has been shown to lead to wrongful convictions is the method by which eyewitness testimony is secured. Recent criminal justice policy and procedure

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now