Verified Document

Bail Out Homeowners Instead Of Banks  Term Paper

Wall Street Bailout -- Part II Wall Street Bailout

The government-orchestrated bailout of the banks has been hailed and yet also condemned due to its perceived efficacy or lack thereof. Jeffrey Fuhrer suggested a path that was a lot cheaper and perhaps a lot less encouraging and propagating of the bad habits of banks and government entities that led to the crisis. This alternative, of course, was the individual homeowner bailout. Indeed, bailing out homeowners directly would have cost a mere fraction of what it did indeed cost to bail out Citibank, Wells Fargo and the other banks. However, neither solution alone has a clear advantage over the other when looking at all relevant circumstances. While doing a homeowner bailout would have had its merits, doing just the bank or homeowner bailouts individually probably would not have been as effective as doing them both in concert.

Analysis

This report will start with a compare and contrast of what the two plans called for. The Fuhrer bailout plan to bail out the homeowners was fairly basic. Rather than give the $700 billion in loans to the banks, it was suggested by Fuhrer that money be given directly to homeowners but on a much smaller overall scale. Instead of spending the majority of a trillion dollars, it was suggested that only twenty-five to fifty billion was necessary to get the job done with a lot of that keeping people in their homes and a lot of the rest being distributed in the form of short-term loans that could then be paid back at some future date. Barack Obama championed a similar although much smaller program that helped some families but left others in a crisis. Further, many of those that got assistance did not receive...

Many others still owned more on their mortgage loans than their house was worth. If the assistance was not enough to make their overall home equity positive or at least catch the homeowners up on late payments, then the bailout was perceived to be not enough. Known as Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), the Obama-championed program was deemed to ineffectual and incomplete in entirely too many instances (Baker).
In comparison, what was actually done was a bailout of mostly the banks through cash infusions in the form of loans that had to be paid back. Also prevalent were guided bankruptcies and absorption of failed institutions into larger and more stable institutions. Rather than give more assistance to homeowners, the idea primarily used was to shore up the financial institutions. The common rationale was to avoid runs on funds and other negative events that could have made the situation worse through paranoia. Keeping the system stable with the ostensible full faith and credit of the federal government was seen as the more important factor and that decision was probably the right one if only one of the two bailout types was used. However, the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) program alone did not have to be the only solution used. However, it was indeed the primary solution chosen.

To suggest that a HAMP-style program using more of Fuhrer's style being used in addition to, rather than instead of, the TARP program is worthy of note and review. However, using the homeowner bailout instead of the bank bailout would have been a bad idea on a number of levels. During the Great Recession, there were a number of banks that did fail or that were on the verge of…

Sources used in this document:
While some may view the bank bailouts as encouraging bad behavior, the money had to be and was paid back. Further, letting the banks fail would have imperiled a lot more bank deposits and assets that belonged to homeowners than would have been savable for a scant fifty billion. Indeed, the same bad consumer behavior that helped feed the mortgage monster would similarly feed runs on banks based on perceptions and hysteria. While the economic conditions of 2007 and 2008 were quite bad, they never approach Great Depression levels. On the same note, while unemployment reached roughly ten percent during the Great Recession, it was 2.5 times that during the Great Depression in the 1930's and the United States economy was quite dismal until the ramp-up during World War II (Perry, and Vernengo). However, when one inserts widespread panic into the equation, the Great Recession could have been a lot, lot worse. If the banking system had not been shored up at all in favor of bailing out only the consumers, it could have been quite cataclysmic because just bailing out the homeowners when the banks are failing due to their own or created problems would have negated much of what a homeowner bailout would have accomplished (Peicuti).

With that said, the housing bubble was not just the fault of the banks and the homeowners who procured the foolish loans had their part as well. A similarity regarding all of the bailouts is that everyone in the chain misbehaved and that includes the federal government, the homeowners and the banks. Indeed, part of the problem that created the housing bubble was improper oversight by the federal government. This oftentimes manifested with near-direct or entirely direct participation and complicity of the federal government. For example, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were not technically part of the government prior to the Great Recession but only in the sense that the United States Postal Service is not part of the federal government either. Referred to as government-serviced enterprises (or GSE's for short), those two entities had to be bailed out to the tune $66 billion had to be paid back to the federal government as those two groups had to be bailed out as well. Just as with AIG and the broader TARP program, all of that money was paid back and with a tidy profit on top of it to boot. The government really has no excuses about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac going forward as the two groups became part of the federal government via conservatorship in 2008 and they are now federalized agency. There is some talk of those groups being wound down and done away with but that has not happened as of yet (Phillips).

While it may be more attractive to some to help homeowners directly and leave the larger banks hanging, proof of why that is an exceedingly bad idea was easy to spot during the Great Recession when banks were folding left and
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Banks Improper Foreclosure and Mortgage Practices in
Words: 2595 Length: 8 Document Type: Research Paper

Banks Improper Foreclosure and Mortgage Practices in the Banking Industry Efficient Market Hypothesis Real Estate Bubble Sub-Prime Mortgages Overview on the Value of Banks Arguments against Financial Intermediaries Ethical Violations This research paper aims to shed light into what led to the global financial collapse that, for the most part, began in the U.S. housing market and the ethical implications that followed. Many researchers agree that the primary drivers that led to the real estate crisis was the

Social Justice -- Kantian Paradigm
Words: 3891 Length: 11 Document Type: Term Paper

Further, the physical well-being of everyone should be respected and there should be a guarantee that a "minimum level of material well-being, including basic [human needs], must be met by society, Peffer posits, explaining his view of Rawlsianism. The functions of a human being are important to respect, and basic liberties including: freedom of speech, assembly, thought, movement and other rights should be respected, Peffer continues. Moreover, freedom from arbitrary

Economic Stimulus, Banking Firms, and
Words: 2615 Length: 9 Document Type: Research Proposal

These can include the stimulus package, though, because the Obama Administration is still offering stimulus dollars to banks and other companies that need help and cannot take care of their customers in the way that they used to and preferred to. Figure 1: How Severe is the Subprime Mess? Obviously, the subprime mess is a serious concern for everyone. The stimulus package was designed to help the banks and the people

Monetary Policy & Interest Rates
Words: 1522 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

Future Ahead In the face of global credit crisis, it is expected that Fed has to make further changes such as cut in the more important federal funds rate to maintain stability. The pattern of growth is likely to change showing a slow down. "Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Economy.com, has trimmed his forecast to show economic growth of about 2.5% in the current quarter, down sharply from 4% in

Real Estate Funding Chapter How
Words: 11371 Length: 40 Document Type: Term Paper

A secondary mortgage market permits mortgage originators to be more responsive to dynamic mortgage demand and to lower mortgage rates for some homeowners when mortgage demand is higher. According to Koppell (2001): Government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) are hybrids -- part public, part private -- that affect the lives of most Americans. Anyone who has borrowed money to purchase a home, farm, or pay for college, or invested in a mutual fund

U.S. Legislation: Foreclosure Relief Economy
Words: 645 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

But Morgenson suggests even more troublingly, that the fundamental assumption of affordability behind the new program is flawed: "in devising what it considers an affordable mortgage payment, the program doesn't account for all of a borrower's debts -- the first mortgage, second lien, credit card debt and automobile payments. Instead, it calculates affordability using only the borrower's first mortgage payment, insurance and property taxes" (Morgenson 2009). The program may even

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now