AVON Product Case Study Analysis
Avon Products Case Study Analysis
Avon Products was founded in 1886 by David H. McConnell, a door-to-door book salesman who had a knack for making perfume. As the company grew, it took on a regional approach to business and was one of the first pyramid-styled businesses, allowing agents the ability to maximize their success within the company. Up until 2005, the company was growing and very healthy. It was an $8 billion dollar public company and had been globally active for some time. In fact, 70% of the company's profits were obtained outside of the United States.
As with any fast-growing company, a problem emerged for the company, in 2006. This problem prompted the attention of the directors when the revenues of the company began flattening and operating profits started declining. These declines prompted an investigation into what could possibly be the causes, and the discoveries revealed some painful, but necessary changes within the company's overall operating and talent sectors. The changes both resulted in management cutbacks and some painful changes and moves away from the company's traditional model of doing business. The results, however, drastically improved the company and ensured further growth in the marketplace.
In order to improve their company's revenues, the company underwent what they dubbed a fundamental restructuring of the organization. In business, a fundamental restructuring happens when the core components and structures of a company are changed to better meet the company's modern needs. Additionally, the changes seem to be those of a punctuated equilibrium, being decisive, quick and complete (Brown, 1997). The changes are always drastic and involve complete change, leaving absolutely nothing of the past...
While a physical restructuring can often lead to decreases in shares and harm a company, a fundamental restructuring is handled internally and need not even raise attention in the media (Langlois, 1995). This is the most common form of change done by modern companies, in fact management changes seem to drastically improve a company's overall success (Guha, 1997). It is for these reasons that the Avon Products company's change was a fundamental restructuring. The company took apart portions of the business and reshaped the business using more modern successful models. Additionally, the changes seemed to be done in a private manner within the company. None of the changes directly effected the business or their overall name in the market.
The fundamental restructuring of Avon Products took place in four areas of the company. First, the company changed from a regional to a matrix structure. The reason was that the company had grown very large and was not running at top efficiently in the international marketplace with regional setup. Next, the company reduced its management from fifteen down to eight layers. This allowed the company to also reduced compensation benefits by 25%. Third, the company entirely changed their approach to executive talent training and company talent growth. Previously, there was little clear guidance as to how an agent can work up to a management position within the company. Additionally, the company added extra benefits for top performing managers and "teeth" for those managers who failed to perform as expected. The final reorganization was to remove any unproductive portions of the company and reinvest in the productive portions.
The evaluation information centered around the company's overall premises and business practices…
