A Day That Will Live in Infamy: The Attack on Pearl Harbor
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt famously called the attack on Pearl Harbor a day that would live in infamy. The Japanese bombing of the American naval base of Pearl Harbor was the event that ultimately precipitated US entry into World War II. Of course, for many years, the US had shown sympathy to the Allied powers. But the bombing of Pearl Harbor ultimately drove America to choose sides and formally end its neutrality. Supporting the Allied powers was not as popular a stance as might have been believed with hindsight, and isolationist sentiment was still a factor Roosevelt had to overcome.
The Where of Pearl Harbor
The attack on Pearl Harbor was a surprise attack, and an attack on a nation which was still officially neutral despite growing Japanese resentment of perceived and real American bias against the Axis powers. The attack on December, 7, 1941 killed over 2,400 Americans and resulted in significant damage to the American Naval fleet (Robinson, 2011). The US declared war upon Japan shortly thereafter. As promised, Britain declared war on Japan, commensurate with its promise that it would make such a declaration if the US entered the war on its side (“What was the Significance of Pearl Harbor,” 2019). The US had already been aiding the British with supplies, and the British were desperate for American aid. Soon after, Germany and Italy declared war on the US, as it was now at war with their ally Japan (“What was the Significance of Pearl Harbor,” 2019).
The Why of Pearl Harbor
The question arises as to why Japan was so willing to attack the United States in the first place, given US military power and strength. Japan, in contrast to Germany, had fought on the side of the United States during World War I. What transpired to cause a fissure between the US and its former ally? But the failure of Japan’s economy had given rise to militarism in the wake of the worldwide Great Depression. Just as Germany, Italy, and even the US saw a rise of radical political ideologies due to economic frustrations, so did Japan. According to Robinson (2011): “Hit hard by the Great Depression of the early 1930s, however, Japanese disillusion with party government grew and moderates gave way to militants” who promised a return to Japanese Imperial glory (par. 2). Japan was a small, resource-poor nation with a growing population. This drove its thirst for empire. Until Pearl Harbor, Japan had largely confined its attacks to its neighbors, including China and the infamous Chinese invasion of the...…Roosevelt deliberately permitted the US to be attacked to precipitate a quick entrance into the war, the evidence is that the US was in fact quite ill-prepared for any war at the time, and Roosevelt himself was attempting to buy time by extending the period of ostensible American neutrality. Furthermore, the US viewed Nazi Germany as America’s main foe, not Japan, and most of the emerging American military operations were focused upon preparing for a war in Europe, not on the Pacific front (Robinson, 2011).
Even when Japanese aircraft were detected by American radar on the day of the attack, the American military failed to act. There was also a great deal of miscommunication between America’s chief military operatives that Japan was able to capitalize upon, ensuring that the attack on Pearl Harbor would be successful. “Japanese messages were decoded by the army and navy on alternate days and all too often one service failed to properly communicate their new intelligence to the other” (Robinson, 2011, par.13).
Conclusion
The attacks on Pearl Harbor revealed crucial American military and intelligence weaknesses. But ultimately Japan was hurt more than helped by these precipitating attacks. Now the brunt of American public opinion was in favor of the war, and Japan remained as resource-poor as ever in the fight against the Allies.
…
References
Chang, I. (2012). The rape of Nanking. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Prange, G. (1982). At dawn we slept: The untold story of Pearl Harbor. New York, NY: Penguin.
“President Roosevelt’s ‘Day of Infamy’ speech.” (1941). US Capital. Retrieved from: https://www.visitthecapitol.gov/exhibitions/artifact/president-roosevelts-day-infamy- speech-december-8-1941
Pruitt, P. (2018). Why did Japan attack Pearl Harbor? History.com. Retrieved from: https://www.history.com/news/why-did-japan-attack-pearl-harbor
Robinson, B. (2011). Pearl Harbor: A rude awakening. BBC. Retrieved from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/worldwars/wwtwo/pearl_harbour_01.shtml
The significance of Pearl Harbour to America and the Second World War. (2009). The Guardian. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/sep/07/pearl- harbour-america-at-war
What was the significance of Pearl Harbor? (2019). Churchill for Schools. Retrieved from: http://www.churchillarchiveforschools.com/themes/the-themes/key-events-and- developments-in-world-history/what-was-the-significance-of-pearl-harbor/background- information
Attacks on Pearl Harbor and the World Trade Center had similar historical events surrounding each attack. Franklin Delano Roosevelt and George W. Bush used similar policies to combat further attacks and unite the nation The paper highlights the entwined American reactions to the September 11 attacks and the Pearl Harbor attacks. The paper illustrates the similarities in which the over-prevailing backgrounds of each event created reactions to the devastating measures that
CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS The Cuban Missile Crisis (CMC) presented a different type of military intelligence than Pearl Harbor did. In the case of CMC, military intelligence provided tremendous amounts of valuable and incontrovertible evidence. However, that information has to be viewed in the larger context of the times to understand why the United States government viewed the situation as seriously as they did. The United States had been actively but covertly working
Pearl Harbor & 911 Similarities and Differences: Pearl Harbor and 9/11 Sixty years separate two of the most infamous events in American history. Both the terrorist attacks on 9/11 and the Japanese raid on Pearl Harbor were defining moments that altered the course of history. Both caught the country by surprise, rallied its people against their attackers and engendered a long and difficult war against tyranny. The surprise attack on Pearl Harbor on
Though Kimmel himself states that there had been submarine activity around the Islands, there were no actions taken against them as he was waiting for approval from Department of Navy, in the ten days preceding the attack to act decisively. "For some time there had been reports of submarines in the operating areas around Hawaii.... The files of the Commander in Chief, Pacific Fleet, contain records of at least three
S. was that non-interference of the U.S. In the war, leaving it to the Europeans was the best thing to do. Thus there was no urgency felt in creating armaments. Thus in 1940 the armed strength was "only 150,000 men" (Gailey, 1995) and the generals believed that any future war could be fought and won with artillery and infantry and providing air support and they argued that "tanks and airplanes
Pearl Harbor as an Intelligence Failure Several writers and intellectuals express that the shock the Japanese got in their attack on Pearl Harbor was a result from a failure of the United States intelligence community that were unsuccessful to give sufficient, correct information to government as well as to the military decision-makers. As presumed by these historians the intelligence community contained very important information that was misconstrue or in other words
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now