One of the fundamental taboos that has characterized the human condition since time immemorial is eating human flesh. Although some primitive societies have engaged in the practice – and some purportedly still do – the proscription against cannibalism is so ubiquitous and powerful that national governments have not felt compelled to enact legislation outlawing the practice because existing laws concerning murder and the longstanding natural prohibitions against eating other people are regarded as being sufficient. Indeed, even in extreme cases such as the stranded Donner party where survival was at stake, cannibalism is universally regarded as morally and legally wrong. It was against this backdrop that the gruesome circumstances that involved Armin Meiwes, a middle-aged German man was convicted by German courts of recruiting a consensual volunteer on a fetish Web site strictly for the purposes of butchering and eating him. To gain some insights into this event, this paper examines the facts about this case to determine why and what happened as well as how it happened and what occurred afterwards. Finally, a summary of the research and key findings about the Meiwes cannibalism case are presented in the conclusion.
Review and Discussion
The facts of this case are not in dispute. The legal record shows that Armin Meiwes was a quiet, otherwise-pleasant 42-year-old German man from Rotenburg described by local residents who knew him casually as “the perfect neighbor” who, in 2001, located an individual, a 43-year-old engineer...
References
Cannibalism overview. (2018). Cornell Legal Information Institute. Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/cannibalism.
Harding, L. (2003, December 3). Victim of cannibal agreed to be eaten. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/dec/04/germany.lukeharding.
Sheinman, H. (2011). Promises and agreements: Philosophical essays. New York: Oxford University Press.
Question 5: Since the events of September 11th, terrorism has been a crucial concern for Americans specifically, and the global society in general. As Wilkins (2005) notes, although it is generally agreed to be justifiable to commit violence in the act of self-defense against aggressors, many of the victims of terrorism are innocent of any crime, and that the question of "collective guilt" must come into play when determining the justification for
Although the circularity of the logic of insanity as demonstrated by the very fact that a man desires to be eaten (because he is insane, because he wants to be eaten, because he is insane…) loses credibility due to the redundancy of such thinking, the implicit conclusion that the author comes to regarding this matter, "if every person with emotional problems were denied the right to determine what is
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now