¶ … Leaders Born or Made? Proposed Outline
The question as to whether leaders are born or made has been actively debated for years. The debate continues. However, careful evaluation of leadership behaviors and an informed analysis of literature on management and leadership demonstrate that actually, leaders are both born and made. It is important to note that although individuals could be trained to be effective leaders, some people tend to have what could be referred to as natural aptitude for leadership.
Counter Argument
Leaders are Born
The claim that leaders are born, not made, has been around for a long time. Those advancing this argument are convinced that leadership is in the genes, that great leaders possess some genetic characteristics that underwrite their success as leaders.
B.
During the early periods of the 20th century, most were of the view that to be an effective leader, an individual had to be born with inherent traits of leadership. Many psychologists of the era, like Jung, claimed that leadership traits were inherited, and not acquired. Today, there are some who, like Jung, are still convinced that leaders are born, not made. To put this argument into perspective, it would be prudent to, amongst other things, highlight the findings of a recent research undertaking that sought to "test the nature of leaders and followers using pairs of fish" (Nakayama, 2013). As the author further points out, leaders and followers are not unique to humans - they are found in many other animals that live a group setting, such as fish. Titled, "Experience Overrides Personality Differences in the Tendency to Follow but not in the Tendency...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now