Verified Document

Archibald, L. 2008 . "Working Memory Research Proposal

In order to determine both the learning and the memory differences that existed in the two groups of children with two different identified developmental disorders/impairments, a series of different standardized test was administered privately to each individual participant in the study, with no more than two tests (and usually just one) administered at a time (Alloway & Archibald 2008). The first round of tests measured working memory, and subsequent tests assessed attainment abilities of the individual children in various learning areas. The tests that the researchers used had all been previously vetted by the scientific community, and were accepted as valid and reliable measures of the component that the researchers were specifically testing for in each instance, and all recommendations concerning the individual tests used (such as subtest order and the test-taking environment)...

Specifically, children with a developmental coordination disorder showed impairment across both verbal and visuospatial learning, as well as in working memory tests related to these areas and in short-term memory. The children with specific language, impairments, showed no significant difference in visuospatial skills and memory or short-term memory from standard means of children their ages, but showed similar verbal impairments to the DCD group (Alloway & Archibald…

Sources used in this document:
To this end, the authors studied working memory profiles in the two groups of children with different developmental pathologies in an effort to better understand the way working memory function affects development (Alloway & Archibald 2008). Previous to this study, it had already been well established that memory differences can play an important part in explaining individual differences in learning, with poor memory skills most often associated with failing to in reading, mathematics, and language comprehension (Alloway & Archibald 2008). Other areas of concern to the authors with a noted relationship to memory were vocabulary acquisition and visuospatial skills, highlighting memory's importance in all learning (Alloway & Archibald 2008).

In order to determine both the learning and the memory differences that existed in the two groups of children with two different identified developmental disorders/impairments, a series of different standardized test was administered privately to each individual participant in the study, with no more than two tests (and usually just one) administered at a time (Alloway & Archibald 2008). The first round of tests measured working memory, and subsequent tests assessed attainment abilities of the individual children in various learning areas. The tests that the researchers used had all been previously vetted by the scientific community, and were accepted as valid and reliable measures of the component that the researchers were specifically testing for in each instance, and all recommendations concerning the individual tests used (such as subtest order and the test-taking environment) were followed (Alloway & Archibald 2008).

This study found that there were definite memory differences between the two groups with their disparate developmental difficulties that could very likely account for the observed differences in learning difficulties and attainment levels, though more research is necessary to firmly establish a causal relationship (Alloway & Archibald 2008). Specifically, children with a developmental coordination disorder showed impairment across both verbal and visuospatial learning, as well as in working memory tests related to these areas and in short-term memory. The children with specific language, impairments, showed no significant difference in visuospatial skills and memory or short-term memory from standard means of children their ages, but showed similar verbal impairments to the DCD group (Alloway & Archibald 2008). Further research could strengthen these findings.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Nanking Genocide 1937 Nanking's Genocide
Words: 4601 Length: 13 Document Type: Thesis

These include claims for Japanese revisionists that "… critics have stretched tales of Japanese brutality as means of putting political pressure on Japan and winning compensation." There has in fact been a revisionist interpretation of the events at Nanking since the 1900s, with the intention of either ignoring or invalidating the resurgence of interest in the horrific facts of rape, torture and wanton slaughter attributed to the Japanese forces. For

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now